Tuesday, June 3, 2014

IE Profession - Is it focusing on improving the productivity of human resources at every level?



IE profession earns a bad name when it focuses on eliminating the need of people in production systems. It creates unemployment and underemployment and social tensions.

It can focus on improving productivity of human resource at every level and thereby increase the earnings of people across the society and do a service to the society. It means at every level, it adjusts the input combination around a person to improve his productivity.

In Germany such an approach is taken in the society in contrast to USA where elimination of manpower has become an obsession.


http://blogs.hbr.org/2014/05/why-germany-dominates-the-u-s-in-innovation/

Saturday, April 19, 2014

Standard Operation and Standard Operation Sheets in Toyota Production System

Industrial Engineers, F.W. Taylor, Frank Gilbreth, Harrington Emerson and subsequently H.B. Maynard emphasized the need to employ standard operating procedures in Production and Distribution systems. In Toyota Motors, Taiichi Ohno implemented standard operations with the additional responsibility given to supervisors to ensure that there is improvement in standard operations periodically. The idea that operators and supervisors have to be involved more in operation improvement activities was advocated by Alan Mogensen, an industrial engineer and he named it work simplification. During second world war, American agencies created a training within industry system that emphasized improvement activities to be undertaken by supervisors. Japanese managers and engineers have absorbed all these ideas and Taiichi Ohno and other managers in Toyota Motors came out with world class implementation of IE principles and techniques.

We understand about IE in Japan through the books of Shigeo Shingo and Taiichi Ohno.

Standard Operation and Standard Operation Sheets

Taiichi Ohno wrote:

Standard work sheets and the information contained in them are important elements of the Toyota production system. Standard worksheet must be written in a manner that workers understand it.

In Toyota, standard work sheet is the basis for examining the resources used by an operation and eliminating waste (excess usage of resources), for improving machining processes and tools, installing autonomous systems, analyzing the need for transportation and methods of transportation, and for optimizing the work-in-progress at various steps in the process or operation. Standard work sheet will be updated by steps taken to prevent the recurrence of defects, operational mistakes, accidents and all ideas suggested by operators. Standard work sheet provides the basis for current execution and also for process and operation improvement.

The standard work sheet provides for effective and efficient combination of materials, workers and machines. This combination is termed as work combination in Toyota.

Standard worksheet contains three elements.
1. Work sequence
2. Cycle time
3. Standard inventory

The term work sequence in an operation refers to the various tasks carried out in an operation. It includes the worker picking the item, transporting it to the machine if required, mounting it on the machine, doing the operation, removing it from the machine etc. The job of supervisor, section chief or group foreman is to train workers. When the standard work sheet or work sequence is very clear, it should take only three days to train a new worker (say trained in general machining work) and workers quickly learn to avoid rework involved in producing defective parts.

Cycle time is the time allowed to make one piece or unit. It is actually standard time in the usual terminology. When there is difference between the actual time taken and the standard time, in most cases, it is due to  differences in operation motion and sequence. So a standard work sheet helps the supervisor to first check whether the operator is following the sequence and motions specified.

The concept of tact time is different and number of worker allotted to a group depends on the tact time. If the tact time is less more workers are allotted to a work cell and if tact time is more less number of workers are allotted to a work cell. But standard time for various operations performed by a work cell remain the same.

Standard inventory refers to the inventory kept before and after an operation. This inventory is kept to absorb fluctuations in output by the earlier operations or it could be the lot size inventory. Toyota production system is based on low inventory every where and therefore, the standard inventory has to be adhered to more rigorously.

Three Temporal Aspects of Standard Operations.

Shigeo Shingo describes the past, present and future aspects of standard operations.

Standard operation implies optimization of work conditions by analyzing

What is produced
Who - persons, machines, tools,and jigs
How - Method - machine speeds and feeds, man's movements
Where - Layout of the equipment and man - Work Station Design
When - Standard time, and Schedule

The Toyota production system insists that standard operation sheets are written by production people only. This refers to the past. This gives the engineer, supervisor, and workers of the shop an occasion to see what they are doing and facilitates operations improvement. So, from the idea that industrial engineer prepares the standard operation sheet, the responsibility is shifted to the production people. Industrial engineer may still make his contribution, but the final operation sheet is prepared and implemented by the production people only. It gets periodically improved even without the involvement of industrial engineers.

Present
New workers are trained by using standard operation sheets. The workers keep referring to the sheet until they are familiar with the technique. So, there has to be a standard operation sheet by the side of the machine using which new workers are trained.

Future:
The Toyota system demands that all work is done within standard time and supervisor is charged with the responsibility. He has to train the worker. He has to determine the nonstandard motions responsible for the extra time. Thus the standard operation sheet helps in correcting deviations.

Also supervisor is responsible for improvements. A supervisor who has not improved the standard procedures in his area of work would feel embarassed in the Toyota culture.

The above is the explanation for the past, present and future of standard operation sheets by Shigeo Shingo.

Types of Standard Operating Charts

The standard operations system is more elaborate in TPS than normally described in traditional IE texts.

Capacity charts by part
For a part, the order of operations, operation names, machine numbers on which it can be processed, basic operation time, tool changing time, etc. are given.

Standard task combination
This sheet will describe the order in which individual worker's operations takes place.

Task manual
Task manuals described procedures for each element of the operation. For example, for machine operation, tool changing, set changes, etc.

Task instruction manual
It provides instructions for trainers who provide training to operators

Standard operating sheet
These sheets indicate order of tasks in an operation, cycle time, operation inventory, safety and quality instructions.

Source: Shigeo Shingo - A Study of the Toyota Production System from Industrial Engineering Point of View.

Lean Manufacturing - Research Papes and Articles - Bibliography



Articles on Lean - IIE Website Page
https://www.iienet2.org/Details.aspx?id=15882

Emerald Insights Database


A strategic and operational approach to assess the lean performance in radial tyre manufacturing in India: A case based study
Type: Research paper
Author(s): Vipul Gupta, Padmanav Acharya, Manoj Patwardhan
Source: International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management Volume: 62 Issue: 6 2013


Application of lean manufacturing using value stream mapping in an auto-parts manufacturing unit
Type: Case study
Author(s): Harwinder Singh, Amandeep Singh
Source: Journal of Advances in Management Research Volume: 10 Issue: 1 2013


Improvement of manufacturing operations at a pharmaceutical company: A lean manufacturing approach
Type: Case study
Author(s): Boppana V. Chowdary, Damian George
Source: Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management Volume: 23 Issue: 1 2012



Four decades of lean: a systematic literature review
Type: Literature review
Author(s): Kyle B. Stone
Source: International Journal of Lean Six Sigma Volume: 3 Issue: 2 2012

Applying lean principles for high product variety and low volumes: some issues and propositions
Type: Case study
Author(s): Jay Jina, Arindam K. Bhattacharya, Andrew D. Walton






Application of value stream mapping in an Indian camshaft manufacturing organisation
Type: Case study
Author(s): S. Vinodh, K.R. Arvind, M. Somanaathan
Source: Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management Volume: 21 Issue: 7 2010

A continuing lean journey: an electronic manufacturer's adopting of Kanban
Type: Case study
Author(s): Andrew Lee-Mortimer
Source: Assembly Automation Volume: 28 Issue: 2 2008


Materials flow improvement in a lean assembly line: a case study
Type: Case study
Author(s): Rosario Domingo, Roberto Alvarez, Marta Melodía Peña, Roque Calvo
Source: Assembly Automation Volume: 27 Issue: 2 2007


Work organization in lean production and traditional plants: What are the differences?
Type: Research paper
Author(s): Cipriano Forza
Source: International Journal of Operations & Production Management Volume: 16 Issue: 2 1996

Lean production in a changing competitive world: a Japanese perspective
Type: Case study
Author(s): Hiroshi Katayama, David Bennett
Source: International Journal of Operations & Production Management Volume: 16 Issue: 2 1996


The Design of Lean Manufacturing Systems Using Time-based Analysis
Type: Conceptual Paper
Author(s): R.C. Barker
Source: International Journal of Operations & Production Management Volume: 14 Issue: 11 1994


Ebsco Database


How VIBCO Achieved Lean.   Full Text Available
Production Machining. Apr2013, Vol. 13 Issue 4, p16-20. 2p.


ANALYSIS OF LEAN MANUFACTURING FRAMEWORKS.   Full Text Available
By: ANAND, G.; KODALI, RAMBABU. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems. Jun2010, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p1-30. 30p. 1 Diagram, 2 Charts.

Key Issues for the implementation of Lean Manufacturing System.   Full Text Available
By: Upadhye, Nitin; Deshmukh, S. G.; Garg, Suresh. Global Business & Management Research. 2009, Vol. 1 Issue 3/4, p57-68. 12p. 1 Diagram, 5 Charts, 4 Graphs.


Classification scheme for lean manufacturing tools.   Full Text Available
By: Pavnaskar, S. J.; Gershenson, J. K.; Jambekar, A. B. International Journal of Production Research. 9/10/2003, Vol. 41 Issue 13, p3075. 16p. 6 Diagrams, 3 Charts.






TPM

TPM Slogans - India Contributed by Large Number of Companies
http://www.tpmclubindia.org/pdf/TPM_Slogans.pdf

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Business Processes Improvement - Bibliography - 2014




5 Early Warning Signals for a BPI Project

5 Early Warning Signals for a BPI Project - Part 1

Assembly of Rim and Tyre of Tractors - Problem of Batch Manufacturing



Problems in the Current System at Mahindra and Mahindra Plant, Nagpur

.
1. More handling during shifting is involved in existing process.
2. Haphazard inwarding of tyres & rims without considering arrival of vehicles, available space & requirement for assembly.
3. Distance travelled by the worker & vehicle is more from storage to assembly & from assembly to production line.
4. Inventory of Tyres & Rims is the major concerns as it is “A” class material.
5. Limited space availability for storage & mixing of tyres & rims.
6. Vehicle turnaround time is very high up to 18 hours from inwarding in plant to outward.
7. Waiting time of direct vehicles is extended up to 8 days due to nonavailability of space for unloading.
8. Paying high vehicle detentation charges due to vehicle detentation
9. Non availability of space for unloading of Tyres & Rims which are urgent for production due to limited space for unloading.
10. Damages of Tyres & Tubes due to wrong storage & internal handling.
11. Damage of Tyres & Rims during assembly.
12. Production loss due to wrong tyre- rim assembly fitment.
13. Location specific Tyre fitment controlling is also major concern.
14. Obselence of Tyres due to end of shelf life.
15. Lack of SOPs


OBSERVED DATA

Total shift 3
Total hour per shift 8
Lunch and tea break per shift 40 min
Maintenance time per shift 10 min

A. Throughput time
1. Process time=214 sec
2. Inspection time=22 min, 5 sec
3. Move time=19 min, 16 sec
4. Queue time=40days, 8 hrs, 3 min,48 sec
Throughput time= (process time +inspection time+ move time +queue time)
= 40 days, 8 hrs, 3 min, 48 sec

B.Overall Equipment Efficiency

Planned production time = (1440-120)
 = 1320

Operating production time = (1320-30)
 = 1290

Availability = (Operating time/ planned Production time)
=1290/1320
=0.9772

Performance = (Ideal Cycle Time * Pieces  Produced) / Operating Time
 = (2.5*500)/1290

Performance = (Ideal Cycle Time * Pieces
 Produced) / Operating Time
 = (2.5*500)/1290
 = 0.9689

Quality = (Good Pieces / Pieces
 Produced)
 = 0.95

0EE = (Availability* Performance
*Quality)
 = 0.899


C.Takt time
Takt time = (operating time/customer
demand)
= 1290/500
= 2.58min/piece

D.From Current state VSM

Value Added Time =84 Min.
Production Lead Time =40 day,54 hrs,20 min.

Critical: Against as value added time of 84 minutes, the lead time is 40 days, 54 hrs, 20 min

The system can be redesigned using the lean tools such as layout modification, visual factory, multiskilled labour, kaizen, kanban and 5S as appropriate.

Source for the Observations

International Conference on Emerging Frontiers in Technology for Rural Area (EFITRA) 2012
Proceedings published in International Journal of Computer Applications® (IJCA)
26
Value Stream Mapping Tool for Waste Identification in
Tyre-Rim Assembly of Tractor Manufacturing
http://research.ijcaonline.org/efitra/number2/efitra1013.pdf

Monday, March 24, 2014

BECOMING LEAN ENTERPRISE: THEORY AND CASE STUDIES - Training Program by Narayana Rao at NITIE, Mumbai, India


BECOMING LEAN ENTERPRISE: THEORY AND CASE STUDIES


About the Programme

In lean enterprises new product and process innovations are accompanied by product and process efficiency innovations. Lean enterprises are committed to the economic principle that states market decides price of a new product or existing product. Profit is earned by cost reductions due to efficiency improvement. Lean enterprise model was demonstrated to the world by Toyota which excelled in both technology innovation and technology efficiency engineering. The excellence was visible in all functional areas. Toyota system was explained to others by Taiichi Ohno, a production manager and Shigeo Shingo, an industrial engineer. It was explained to the western audience by MIT research team. Today many companies of the world have embraced lean enterprise principles.  It is confrontational global competition now and firms who do not make efforts to implement world class management practices will find it difficult to sustain their market shares. The programme provides an understanding of the theory of lean enterprise supported by various case studies from the literature.

Objectives of the Programme:

The participants will:

appreciate the importance of lean enterprise concept
get conversant with principles of lean enterprise
become aware of implementation in various companies through case studies.

Coverage:



  • Toyota lean enterprise system (Descriptions by Taiichi Ohno, Yasuhuri Monden, and Jim Womack and Dan Jones
  • Lean system design - Principles and Action Plan Proposed by Shigeo Shingo (Celebrated Japanese Industrial Engineer) and  Jim Womack and Dan Jones (Lean Thinking Specialists) 
  • Toyota style industrial engineering (Taiichi Ohno and Shigeo Shingo)
  • Total productivity management (Japan Management Association)
  • Lean manufacturing
  • Lean product design
  • Lean supply chain design
  • Lean marketing and retailing
  • Total industrial engineering ( Prof. Yamashina - World Class Manufacturing Consultant)


For Whom Meant

Operating executives in manufacturing, product design, supply chain, marketing and industrial engineering departments/functions.


Venue: NITIE
Duration: 5 days
Starts on 19.May 2014
Ends on  23 May 2014
Faculty: Dr. K.V.S.S. Narayana Rao, Professor, NITIE
Programme Brochure:  https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_wsqO0CACaiVHRrdFlIOW5oWWc/edit


The Programme is listed at number 40 in the NITIE MDP  Brochure:  http://www.nitie.edu/MDP%20Calendar%20Final_2014-15.pdf


The Programme can be Customized for the Company


The programme can be offered as a company based programme or unit based programme in the premises of a company with 25 persons as participants in the batch. If you are interested, please send an email to kvssnrao55  at the rate  gmail.com.

In the case of company programmes, every day plant visits will be part of the programme to identify areas of improvement, which participants can take up subsequent to the programme.

About the Faculty


Prof K.V.S.S. Narayana Rao is a graduate in mechanical engineering, post graduate in industrial engineering and doctorate in capital markets, with professional experience in manufacturing industry and stock broking industry. His academic involvement includes areas: basics of industrial engineering, strategic aspects of industrial engineering, lean management and thinking, logistics management, inventory control, cost management, management accounting, engineering economics, production planning and control, operations research, financial accounting, cost accounting, security analysis and portfolio management, financial management and mergers acquisitions.  He has addressed recently Tata Steel executives on the topic Lean Management for Productivity Enhancement.

Prof Rao brings a multidisciplinary approach in his training programmes combining engineering, management, economics, accounting and finance. He is also involved in teaching research methodology and review of research in management at the PhD level.

The details of fee etc. for unit based programmes are also given in the NITIE MDP Brochure:
http://www.nitie.edu/MDP%20Calendar%20Final_2014-15.pdf

Saturday, March 8, 2014

Productivity Inc. - Consultant




Productivity Inc.
375 Bridgeport Ave, 3rd Floor, Shelton, CT 06484 | T: (203) 225-0451 | F: (203) 225-0771

LEAN ENTERPRISES

Removing obstacles from the value stream so that value flows to customers.

In a lean enterprise, people work together to solve problems, perfect processes, and search continually for the best ways to deliver value to customers.

"Lean" is a way of managing your organization to deliver maximum value to customers with minimal resources and zero waste. Companies that put "lean thinking" into action become highly competitive, resilient, and adaptive.

Becoming lean means understanding your company as a complete system rather than a series of departmental silos. Lean companies continually improve cost, quality, delivery, and capabilities by:

Simplifying processes across the entire enterprise and supply chain.
Shortening lead times.
Aligning production and service delivery to match customer demand and cash flow.
Learning continuously and dynamically, with a culture rooted in daily problem-solving and mutual respect.


Productivity knows lean. We brought lean principles to the West, and we understand its technical and human sides. For more than 30 years we have advanced the capabilities of organizations and individuals through consulting, training, certification, research, and more.

We are proven experts who can help your organization become and stay lean.

http://www.productivityinc.com/operational-excellence/lean/