Showing posts with label Shigeo Shingo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shigeo Shingo. Show all posts

Friday, March 6, 2026

The Toyota Production System - Features, Principles and Mechanics - Shigeo Shingo - Industrial Engineering

 


The success of Toyota in cost reduction, productivity improvement, and international competitiveness and its celebrated Toyota Production System, fulfilled the dream of Yoichi Ueno (that Japan can guide US in improved practices of efficiency improvement). The success of #Toyota and the World Class #TPS was  built on the sustained efforts many Japanese persons who understood Taylor and Gilbreth's writings and improvised them in implementing them in Japanese companies.

Shigeo Shingo said 80% of the TPS is waste elimination that is industrial engineering, 15% production management and 5% kanban communications. In other words, we can say,  "Toyota production system (TPS) is 80% process improvement (Jidoka) and 20% production planning improvement (JIT)." 

Based on the above statement of Shigeo Shingo and the description of Jidoka and JIT provided in many books, I interpret Jidoka as process improvementJIT is production quantity planning and information sharing.

Toyota production system was developed by managers of Toyota with major contribution from Taiichi Ohno by implementing waste elimination methods advocated by industrial engineering. Taiichi Ohno specially applauds industrial engineering as profit making engineering for Toyota. 

Shingo builds up on the Ohno's explanation of TPS by clearly bringing out the role of industrial engineering in the development of TPS in his book. The following content is from Shingo's Book

A Study of the Toyota Production System from Industrial Engineering Point of View


Industrial engineering point of view is IE Strategic View, Facilities Industrial Engineering, Process Industrial Engineering, Operations Industrial Engineering and Engineering Element Industrial Engineering.

Chapter 4  Conclusions of Developing Non-Stock Production 


The principal feature of the TPS is eliminating the total cost associated with inventory - the total of inventory carrying cost, setup or order cost and shortage cost. Hence, TPS is described as stockless or non-stock system.

Stock occur due to two reasons:

Naturally Occurrence:

Stock accumulates because of
* Incorrect market demand forecasts
* Overproduction just to be on the safe side due to likely defects
* Lot production (Batch production)
* Due technological and capacity constraints in certain processes. Heat treatment in three shifts but doing further operations in one shift.

Stock that get accumulated due to inefficiencies in the production system
* Production cycle being longer than order-to-delivery cycle.
* Stock produced in advance to take care of extra demand in the future
*Stock produced to compensate for delays in inspection and transport
* Stock produced to compensate for machine breakdowns
*Stock maintained as buffer between machines to take care of defectives
*Stock generated as per calculation of economic batch quantity to take care of high setup or order cost.

Stock reduction was carried out rationally in Toyota production system.

Three strategies can be pursued to approach the idea of non-stock production.

* Reduce the production cycle
* Eliminate the breakdowns - do preventive maintenance to make the machine available all the time for production (Total productive maintenance)
*Eliminate defect - zero defects through process improvement - detect the reasons for defects and remove
them from the process. 
* Reduce setup times and reduce batch quantity to single piece.
Stock

Chapter 5 The Principles of the Toyota Production System


The Toyota Production System is 80 percent waste elimination (Industrial Engineering), 15 percent production system and only 5 percent kanban communication.

Some Commonly Used Terms in TPS

Waste of Overproduction

There are two types of overproduction:
* Making more than required quantity for a delivery period.
* Making a product before it is needed.

Many systems are happy to produce an item before its delivery date and feel comfortable. But Toyota system does not want both types of overproduction.

Just-in-time

JIT also means just-on-time. An item should be made available when it is required not before or after the required time.

Separation of Worker from the Machine

The whole productivity movement of Toyota was based on the fact that per worker production of cars in America was 10 times that of Toyota company. Toyota wanted to improve their productivity and therefore concentrated on reducing the time spent by a worker on the machine. Machines must work without the assistance of the worker as much as possible. Jidoka or autonomation is the name given to this activity. Along with JIT or stockless production, separation of worker from the machine forms the two pillars of Toyota Production System.

Low Utilization Rates

Toyota's machine-output ratio is two to three times  that of similar companies. This could be due to flow production systems or due to planned extra machine capacity to take care of extra demand. But one must always remember that Toyota's main goal is cost reduction and every decision in Toyota is subjected to engineering economic evaluation.

Multi-machine Handling

In 1955, 700 workers were handling 3500 machines. Hence sometimes machines are idle because worker is busy with other machines and cannot load the machines. Toyota permits machine idle times but it does not permit man idle time. The reason is that a machine costs $500 per month but a man costs twice or thrice more.

Equipment Planning and Low Operating Rates

As low operating rate is expected, Toyota buys less expensive machines. But it improves the machines to suit its requirements continuously.  Because in normal times machines have excess capacity or low operating rates,  peak demand can be handled by hiring temporary workers.

Perform Operation and Remove the Defective Part

Whenever a problem appears, Toyota insists on proper diagnosis of the root cause and demands that an operation is done to remove the replace the defective part of the process. It is not content  with the temporary cure of rework on the defective workpiece.

Fundamentals of Toyota Production System


Adopting a Non-Cost Principle

Elimination of Waste

Eliminating waste through fundamental process improvements
               Processing purpose evaluation and rationalization
               Inspection purpose evaluation and rationalization
               Transport purpose evaluation and rationalization
               Delay reason evaluation and rationalization
               Storage purpose evaluation and rationalization

Eliminating waste through fundamental operation improvement
               Setup improvement
               Auxiliary improvement
               Job allowance improvement
               Workshop allowance improvement
               Improving processing and essential operations

Ask the "five W's and one H" and "Why?" Five Times

              What -  What is being produced  - Is it required - Value engineering
               Who - Men, machines, tools and jigs used for the production
               When - Time  - Production planning also comes here.
                Where - Space (Layout)
              Why - rational for the use of everything used in production. Because it provides opportunities for improvement.
              How - The methods - motion used by man, speed and feeds used by machines

At Toyota specially, 5 Whys are used to identify root causes for defects and appearance of problems.

Mass Production and Large Lot Production are not same

Mass production is beneficial. Large lot production has extra cost. It can be reduced with SMED.

Order-based Production

Characteristics of Order-based Production

To take care of fluctuations in the orders, Toyota sets basic productions capacity at minimum demand level and handles increases through overtime and the use of excess machine capacity and temporary workers.

Overtime: There are four hour breaks between the two shifts and overtime can be given in either shift as needed.

Excess capacity: During the minimum load, many workers manage ten machines but up to 50% capacity only. As demand increases, temporary workers are hired and machines can work at 100% capacity. But machine work has to be simplified and standardized so that temporary workers can be trained in three days and they operate the machines.

Strong Market Research

Toyota does spend on market research to know market requirements. Twice in a year 60,000 people are surveyed. Five or six additional surveys are done in a year.

Production Planning

Long term planning is done.
Annual planning is done.
Monthly planning is done.
Daily planning is done. Daily planning based on actual orders. The actual orders are informed to the first stage of assembly section and they draw the components as required from component supply stages.

Toyota's Supermarket System

In the supermarket system of Toyota, stocking is triggered by actual demand for the components for a daily requirement.

Differences between Ford and Toyota Systems

Large lot versus small lot production

Mixed model assembly in Toyota system

More consistent one piece flow in Toyota system

Chapter 6  Mechanics of the Toyota Production System

Improving the Process - Schedule control and Just-in-Time


Toyota makes efforts and reduces production cycle.

Seven Principles for Shortening the Production Cycle

Reduce process delays
Reduce lot delays
Reducing production time
Employ layout, line forming, and the full work control system
Synchronize operations and absorb deviations
Establishing tact time
Ensure product flow between processes

Adopting SMED


Elimination of Defects

Inspection to prevent defects must be practiced.

100% inspection must be adopted.

Poka-Yoke has to be used as a means for zero defects.

Eliminating Machine Breakdowns
It is also process improvement in TPS. Workers are asked to stop  a machine if there is some trouble. Supervisors are given training and are urged to try to keep machines running. When a trouble appears, a visual indication is given and all try to take care of the problem. Preventing recurrence is the motto of TPS.

Chapter 7 Mechanics of the TPS

Improving Process - Leveling and the Nagara System




What is Leveling?

Leveling is a method of balancing load and capacity in a way different from the traditional way.
For example if load on car assembly plant is 300,000 sets of model A, 600,000 sets of model B and 900,000 units of model C and capacity is 1,800,000 units, the traditional solution is  to make 300,000 sets of model A and 300,000 sets of model B in the first 10 days, 300,000 sets of model B and 300,000 sets of model c and in the next 10 days, and 600,000 units of model C in the last 10 days. The load is balanced at the month level, but it gives rise to inventories of various models and even shortages of some models.

 But Toyota followed a different way because it has as its aim prevention and reduction of over production. In the first 10 days, production of 100,000 units of model A, 200,000 units of model B and 300,000 units of model C are produced. We can see now that inventory will come down. It the 10 day planning/production period can be further reduced, all models are produced in much smaller periods the over production can further be reduced. Toyota uses this approaches and reduces the planning period in which all models are made further and further. This is called "mixed production" and on assembly line it is called "mixed model assembly."


Segmented Production

Making production plans for half a month(H), ten days (T), week (W) and Day (D) are segmented production plans.

Mixed Production and Tact Time

Toyota combines product A with 30 Seconds and product B with 25 seconds and specifies 55 seconds as tact time for A+B.


Nagara System

The nagara system facilitates one piece flow by laying out machines in the sequence of operations by transcending the earlier shop divisions and training and facilitating operators to operate multiple unrelated machines in sequence.

Smooth production flow, ideally one piece at a time, characterized by synchronization (balancing) of production processes and maximum use of available time; includes overlapping of operations where practical. A nagara production system is one in which seemingly unrelated tasks can be produced simultaneously by the same operator.

Nagara is multi-machine handling in a process or flow system. The operator works with two or more different machines.

The example given in the body refers to a spot welding operation, followed by a press operation and then a welding operation that attached the pressed part to a body.

Chapter 8 Mechanics of the TPS

Improving Operations


Operations concern the flow of equipment and operators in time and space. Improvements in operations have long been emphasized in the Toyota Production system.

Components of Operations

1. Preparation and after-adjustment
2. Principal operations
3. Marginal allowances

Preparation and After-Adjustment

Reduce them through SMED

Margin Allowances

Personal allowances - For fatigue and personal needs
Non-personal allowances -
Operational allowances: Oiling, clearing away chips etc.
Workplace related: parts arriving late and machine breakdowns

Standard Operation and Standard Operation Sheets

Standard operation implies optimization of work conditions by analyzing

What is produced
Who - persons, machines, tools,and jigs
How - Method - machine speeds and feeds, man's movements
Where - Layout of the equipment and man - Work Station Design
When - Standard time, and Schedule

Present
There has to be a standard operation sheet by the side of the machine using which new workers are trained.

Future:
The Toyota system demands that all work is done within standard time and supervisor is charged with the responsibility. He has to train the worker. Also supervisor is responsible for improvements.

Types of Standard Operating Charts

Capacity charts by part
Standard task combination
Task manual
Task instruction manual
Standard operating sheet

The topic of standard operations is discussed in more detail in
Standard Operation and Standard Operation Sheets in Toyota Production System

Improving Methods of Operation

The operation, which is a man-machine combination can be improved through:

1. Improvements in human motions
2. Improvement in machine movements - increasing machine cutting speeds, reducing time through simultaneous cutting on multiaxis machines, and using multiple turret heads to shorten tool replacements.
3. Mechanizing human motions.

Improving human motions

Motion study can be used to reduce the operation time or the operator time. Motion study improves the movements or motions made by the operator and also improves the arrangement of materials and tools. 5S movement of Japanese industry is basically the offshoot of principles of motion economy.

Items must be arranged neatly, they must be easily accessible and they must be uniformly aligned.

Improvements in Machine Movements

Examples include raising output by increasing machine cutting speeds, reducing time through simultaneous cutting on multi-axis machines, and using multiple turret heads to shorten tool replacement time. This could involve using faster cutting processes like milling in the place of slower process like shaping.

Mechanizing Human Motions

In Toyota, first the human motions are optimized and then mechanization is attempted. Whenever mechanization is thought of its economics are thoroughly investigated. Toyota insists on kaizen - good change.


Machine Layout and Worker Efficiency


Workers are stationed with in a U layout so that they can easily help one another in case of need. Toyota encourages workers to assist each other in case of need or necessity. It discourages island mentality.  The system requires each worker to learn the operations performed at the two processes adjacent to his or her own and help the others when needed.

Multiple Machine Handling Operations


In 1955 itself, Toyota operated 3,500 machines with only 700 workers.  So one worker operates five machines on an average. In recent years (1981), Toyota managers started advocating multi-process handling. In multiple machine handling, the worker may handling the same type of machines. But in multi-process handling, the worker will handling multiple machines in accordance with the flow of operations or process. The capability of multi-process handling by a worker improves the flow of the process and also improves productivity.

Shingo's Summary of the Toyota Production System - The Last Section of Chapter 8


Basic Features of the TPS


# Cost Reduction through Industrial Engineering methods (elimination of waste)
# Emphasis on non stock production - elimination of overproduction
# Emphasis on labor cost reduction through elimination of waste motions and use of minimal permanent manpower.
# Use of SMED to have low set up times and realize small lot production. Ideal: One piece flow.
# Use order based production
# Follow the rule quantity produced must be quantity ordered.

Process Features of TPS


# Active use of value engineering to optimize the design itself.
# Make effective use of division of labor in design of process
# Using Nagara system
# Inspection - depend on self inspection, successive inspection and poka-yoke
# Transportation - Use flow lay out through out the production system.
# Delay - All operations must have equal times as far as possible. Avoid process delay.
             - Lots must be small - Avoid lot delay

Operation Features of TPS

# Use of SMED and its advanced and automated form one touch setups
# Use autonomatic machines as much as possible rationally (based on engineering economic analysis)
# Use nagara system (machines laid out in flow and operators handling multiple machines in the flow line.
# Autonomate material loading and unloading
# Encourage cooperative  work and eliminate isolated person mentality. Operators have to help the upstream or downstream colleagues as needed and as possible.
# Actively pursue minimum manpower deployment in the production system.

Toyota production system brought two revolutionary changes in the production system thinking and practice.

First one is the thinking that market should pay cost plus profit. Toyota changed it to market expansion through cost reduction and price reduction achieved through identifying and eliminating waste from the product  and production system design and operation.

Second,  the traditional thinking was mass production in large lot based on forecasted demand and keeping inventories. Toyota changed it to small lot production based on no inventory and actual orders.

Based on the above two changes, Shingo concludes that Toyota Production System represents a revolution in production philosophy.


Chapter 9 The Evolution of the Kanban System



Kanban and Railway Tablet System


Ohno discussed the introduction of Kanban system with Shingo. Shingo remembered the tablet system in railways which is exchanged between the driver of the train and the station master. Until the tablet is put into a track switches, the station master cannot allow another train to get into the track segment. Similarly the station master removes the tablet from the next segment of the track and gives it to the driver. The driver cannot move from the station unless he was given the tablet. May be there is a system that will allow the tablet to be removed only when the earlier train completed its journey in the track segment. Shingo felt Kanban system was similar to it.

Then Shingo brings into discussion the order point formula.

Order point is equal to consumption during lead time plus the safety stock.
The batch quantity has to be more than the order point. Reduction in set up time allows the reduction in batch quantity and any reduction in production lead time results in reduction of order point. Thus each improvement in set up time can reduce batch quantity and resulting lead time reduction can reduce order point. Similarly, by attacking root causes that create the need for safety stocks like appearance of defects, machine breakdowns, worker absenteeism, material shortages can reduce safety stocks. Thus measures can be taken to reduce inventories in the system.

Supermarkets and the Kanban System

1. Consumers choose goods of their choice and take the items to the cash counter.
2. The store personnel restock, what has been removed by customers.

Using Kanban for communication is similar to the super market system.

Kanban meaning "Sign" in Japanese language has the three functions.

1. Identification tag - indicates what the product is.
2. Job instruction tag - indicates what is to be made, quantity and time
3. Transfer instruction tag - indicates where the item is to be delivered.

Kanban is also treated as a signal to make a pallet load of parts. Hence the number of kanbans or pallet loads permitted as work in process inventory is an important number.

Number of kanbans or pallet loads permitted as WIP (N) =
[Maximum stock permitted = Batch quantity + safety stock]/Capacity of one pallet (n)

In Toyota system, there are efforts to reduce WIP continuously to zero.

To make the lot size one and WIP zero various steps like implementing SMED, Minimum transport layouts, zero defect and zero breakdown programs etc. are necessary.

Regulatory Function of Kanban

Giving production instructions at the final assembly line allows the kanban system to make transmit the information on new car models (model required by the customers) automatically and easily to upstream processes.






Chapter 10. Some Peripheral But Important Issues


Elimination of the Seven Kinds of Waste


1. Processing


Value analysis and engineering needs to be made. Also purpose analysis needs to be done.

2. The waste of making defective products


Poka-yoke needs to be used to prevent defects. Self inspection and successive inspection are to be promoted.

3. Transport


Improve the layout and reduce the need for transport.

4. Delay


Use small lot sizes and minimize delay for the jobs. Allot multiple machines to workers such that there is no waiting time for them. If needed machines can be idle.

5. Inventory


Use SMED and one piece flow and reduce production cycles.

 

6. Wasted Motions


Do motion studies

7. Overproduction

Reduce production for inventory rationally. Use SMED and decrease lot sizes. Improve informative inspection and avoid defects. Maintain machines such that there are no breakdowns and machines are available production all the time. Produce just-in-time for stockless production.

Kanban Rules

1. A process withdraws parts from the preceding process as per Kanban instructions and removes the Kanban from the pallet and leave the kanban there.

2. The earlier process makes parts in the quantities and order specified in the kanban that they pick up from the storage bin.

3. Nothing is transported and nothing is made without kanban.

4. Kanban always accompanies the parts themselves (identification tag must always be present.

5. Every part placed on a pallet must be of acceptable quality.

6. Efforts are to be made to reduce WIP by reducing kanbans over time.

Extending the System to Parts Suppliers

Toyota did not order suppliers to supply on JIT basis. It implemented JIT in its plants over a period of 20 years and then helped suppliers to implement it over a period of 10 years. Suppliers did not suffer because of the change but benefited through increased profits.

TPS and MRP

Shingo said MRP is not committed to the fundamental improvements like SMED, Zero defects and Zero breakdowns like TPS.

Shingo gave the opinion that companies may use MRP after doing fundamental improvement to the system as done by Toyota.

Chapter 11 - The Future Course of the Toyota Production System


Shingo says people say Just on Time is better tern than Just in Time. But the JIT has become a popular term.

Shingo mentions some steps that companies can take to get orders early and thus increase order to delivery period.

* Solicit advance orders from previous users based on life expectancy of the purchased item.
* In the case of car, approach persons learning to drive.
* Approach people who are getting their building licenses or permissions
* Contact printing presses who prepare wedding invitations, find out the bride and bridegroom and propose various household appliances.

The above things point out to events that precede actual demand and action by sales people can give larger order-to-delivery period.

Of course, actions to reduce production cycle has to go on.

Companies have to move from SMED to One-Touch Setups

No-touch methods

Shingo points out that manufacture can be done in sets, so that one component is made after another component without the operator touching the machine. It means that even change of component is automated.

The Development of a Comprehensive Flow System

TPS presently uses supermarket system. Can it be eliminated and the entire system be made a flow system?

Extending mixed production to machine shop, presswork, welding, forging and casting.

Kanban System Developments

Shingo says he foresees further reduction in Kanbans between processes means less WIP.
Second,. Shingo says the Kanbans can go to further upstream processes instead of the preceding process and thus helping in cutting WIP further.

Developing low cost machines and implementing multi-process handling
It needs to be extended to all the production system.

Extending to Supplier Plants

Efforts will be made to spread the TPS to the entire supply chain.


Summary of Shigeo Shingo's Book - A Study of the Toyota Production System

Toyota Production System Industrial Engineering (TPS IE) Part 1


Summary of Chapters 1 to 3

Chapter 12  - Introducing Toyota Production System

Introducing and Implementing the Toyota Production System - Shigeo Shingo


Chapter 13. The Toyota Production System in Summary


1. The Minus-Cost Principle
2. Non-Stock (JIT) - The First Cornerstone of Waste Elimination
3. Toward Flow Operation
4. Shortening Setup Changeover Times
5. The Elimination of Breakdowns and Defects
6. Fusing Leveling and Non-Stock Production
7. Toward Comprehensive Integrated Flow Operations
8. Labor Cost Reduction (Autonomation): The Second Cornerstone of Waste Elimination
9. From Mechanization to Autonomation
10. Maintaining and Developing Standard Operations
11. Toward a Kanban System

Chapter 14 Afterword


A thesis will have antithesis in dialectics.
There can be a compromise between the two to satisfy both the groups at a point in time.

But Shingo says, the proponents of thesis can try sublation.

What is sublation?


In it's basic meaning, it stands for raising something, from a lower place to a higher place.  Hegel, the famous proponent of dialectics, uses meaning and advocates the need to take the original thesis to a higher level, by preserving what is good in it and improving the disadvantages indicated by the antithesis.

Shingo gives the example that non-stock required deliveries from suppliers every two hours.  The opposing argument pointed out that truck efficiency of the supplier or from the supplier end will go down drastically and will result in increased cost. This disadvantage assumes that one truck will carry the load of one supplier. The sublated solution was that a truck was going to various suppliers and collecting material from them. So trucks were loaded to capacity and trucking cost was not allowed to go up. Thus a higher-level plan involving a totally new method - frequent mixed load deliveries emerged.

The disadvantage of smaller lot sizes was tackled by reduction of set up cost through SMED.

The sublation approach is used in many problems in Toyota.

The primary features of the Toyota production are:
1. Elimination of waste based on the belief that a company's only legitimate source of profits is cost reduction.
2. Satisfy demand through order based non-cost production.

The TPS has been compared to squeezing water from a towel thought to be dry. Many people settle for placing that towel under sun to dry further. But there are some people who squeeze the towel further and bring out some more water. Similarly there are many who eliminate waste that everyone recognizes as waste. Certain problems are allowed to exist in companies are necessary evils and people have become hostage to them. But in TPS, such problems are understood with detailed observation supported by deep thinking and problem solving  goes back to basic issues from which designs emerge to make revolutionary improvements.

Anyone undertaking the study of the Toyota production system comes face to face with SMED concept. Shingo said, "It is developed by me." SMED is now a theory and technique. It is now employed in hundreds of Japanese companies.

TPS is not entirely different from ordinary production management systems. But has unique concepts and special techniques to implement them.  It would be dangerous to take any of the techniques of TPS and implement it in a hurry. This will lead to problems. Shingo himself gave a plan to implement the techniques in a sequence.  One should not rush in to implementation of techniques. The objective is cost reduction and as long as the objective is being achieved, there is no need to rush into techniques. The importance is to be given achieve cost reduction in a continuous way and the next priority is schedule of implementing the next technique.



MACHINE EFFORT INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING - Neglected Component of Industrial Engineering of F.W. Taylor.

"Through this lowering of the selling price the whole public, the buyer and user, of the joint product of the labor and machinery have profited by getting what they buy cheaper." - Taylor in Testimony.

Note products of industrial establishments are the joint product of the labor and machinery.

Celebrate the birthday of F.W. Taylor in your Industrial Engineering Department and Company. Share what you are implementing in your company from Taylor's Ideas.


Birthday of F.W. Taylor 20th March. Modern Industrial Engineering March  2026 Issue - Taylor Month of IE - Contribution of F.W. Taylor to Industrial Engineering and Productivity Management - Implemented and Neglected
Access Essays on F.W. Taylor's Writing - Belt Drive Design, Productivity System and Section, Shop Management, Productivity Science of Machining, and Scientific Management
#IndustrialEngineering #Productivity #CostReduction  #Products  #Processes #Facilities


Updated on 23.4.2022,  5.10.2021,  22 August 2019, 1 December 2014












Thursday, July 11, 2024

Industrial Engineering - Foundation of Toyota Production System

New. Popular E-Book on IE,

Introduction to Modern Industrial Engineering.  #FREE #Download.

In 0.1% on Academia.edu. 9530+ Downloads so far.

https://academia.edu/103626052/INTRODUCTION_TO_MODERN_INDUSTRIAL_ENGINEERING_Version_3_0



Lesson 40 - Taiichi Ohno on Industrial Engineering. Toyota style Industrial Engineering - Waste Elimination 


Video Presentation by Prof. N.Rao
____________________


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUDpFpNKuKQ
____________________




Taiichi Ohno repeats what Taylor said. Improve every element of an operation/process for total cost reduction.


Improve machining processes,  install autonomous systems, improve tools,  rearrange machines,  improve  transportation methods. Examine available resources and  the materials at hand for manufacturing. optimize their use.

Prevent the recurrence of defective products, operational mistakes, and accidents, and by incorporate  workers' ideas."  


Toyota Industrial Engineering that is Ohno's Industrial Engineering is improving every element of the process and reducing every delay, defect and machine breakdown (Naryana Rao)


Toyota style Industrial Engineering - Ohno


"We have eliminated waste by examining available resources, rearranging machines, improving machining processes, installing autonomous systems, improving tools, analyzing transportation methods and optimizing the materials at hand for manufacturing. High production efficiency has also been maintained by preventing the recurrence of defective products, operational mistakes, and accidents, and by incorporating workers' ideas." Taiichi Ohno (P. 21)

Source: Taiichi Ohno, Toyota Production System: Beyond Large Scale Production, pp. 21-22.

Taiichi Ohno on Industrial Engineering. Toyota style Industrial Engineering - Waste Elimination
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2013/11/taiichi-ohno-on-industrial-engineering.html

Toyota Production System Industrial Engineering (TPS IE) Part 1


Toyota Production System - Main Objectives

Elimination of Waste
Low Inventory
Low Order to Delivery Period using low cycle time
.


Toyota Production System - Tools or Techniques


SMED
Poka Yoke

Now popular

TIE - Total Industrial Engineering.
TQM – Zero defects
TPM – High OEE
TPMgmt – Annual Planned Cost Reduction

Shigeo Shingo

A Study of Toyota Production System from an Industrial Engineering Viewpoint by Shigeo Shingo

Book published by Productivity Press

Two Pillars of TPS - Jidoka - JIT


Toyota Production System

A production system based on the philosophy of achieving the complete elimination of all waste in pursuit of the most efficient methods.
Toyota Motor Corporation's vehicle production system is a way of making things that is sometimes referred to as a "lean manufacturing system," or a "Just-in-Time (JIT) system," and has come to be well known and studied worldwide.

This production control system was established based on many years of continuous improvements, with the objective of making the vehicles ordered by customers in the quickest and most efficient way, in order to deliver the vehicles as swiftly as possible. The Toyota Production System (TPS) was established based on two concepts: "jidoka" (which can be loosely translated as "automation with a human touch"), as when a problem occurs, the equipment stops immediately, preventing defective products from being produced; and the "Just-in-Time" concept, in which each process produces only what is needed for the next process in a continuous flow.

Based on the basic philosophies of jidoka and Just-in-Time, TPS can efficiently and quickly produce vehicles of sound quality, one at a time, that fully satisfy customer requirements.


Shigeo Shingo said
80% of the TPS is waste elimination in facilities, processes and inventory, that is industrial engineering (facilities and processes improvement, Jidoka)),
15% - production management (production batch quantities planning, JIT material and production planning) and
5% - kanban (sign board) communications

What is Industrial Engineering?

Industrial Engineering is eliminating Muda, Muri and Mura (Japanese explanation).

IE is developing science that explains productivity (Productivity Science development)

IE is improving technical processes  for cost reduction (Machines and Men) (Fundamental - Productivity Engineering).

IE is improving management processes of planning, organizing, resourcing, executing (accepting and releasing orders, leading, directing, communicating) and controlling (associated activity - Productivity Management).

IE is improving business processes (Augmented).

For some more details visit:  Functions of Industrial Engineering



In Preface to the Japanese Edition

Shigeo Shingo had written that management consultants were not allowed to disclose any confidential or proprietary information. Taiichi Ohno authored two books describing Toyota Production System (TPS).  That allowed Shigeo Shingo, to use the published material as the basis to explain industrial engineering principles behind TPS.

Shigeo had as his objectives in writing the book:

1. Explaining the principles of the Toyota Production System based on Industrial Engineering Theory.
2. Explanation of the system of practicing these principles.
3. Description of the practical application of the methods following these principles.

Chapter 1 Introduction


Production is a network of processes and operations.
Process – transforming material into product is accomplished through a series of operations.
Process – flow of material in time and space.
Process analysis examines the flow of material or product.

In an operation a transformation occurs.
Process analysis questions whether that transformation is required.

Operation Analysis
Operation analysis examines the work performed on products by workers, machines and tools.
Process analysis, operation analysis, motion study and time study form part of methods efficiency engineering.
Process analysis and operation analysis are engineering activities specific to each branch of engineering.
http://nraoiekc.blogspot.in/2012/04/method-study-methods-efficiency.html

Shingo wrote "When we look at operations, we see the work performed to accomplish the transformation of the material - the interaction and flow of equipment and operators in time and space."

I keep insisting that after a process chart is made, for each operation in the process chart, the machine effort and human effort are to be recorded in detail. Motion study, provides two handed operator chart for recording work of every operator involved. For machine effort, for each machine a machine effort sheet has to be prepared to improve machine work.

Chapter 2 Improving Process

Improve process before improving individual operations.
Process is flow of material through operations.

Process Chart - Gilbreth

Processing operation
Inspection operation
Transport operation
Storage operation – Temporary, Permanent (Delay operation)

Process Improvement
Process can be improved in two ways.
The first improves the product itself through design efficiency engineering (value engineering, design for manufacture, design for assembly, and design optimization techniques).
The second improves manufacturing method through methods efficiency engineering, motion studies and production optimization and variability reduction methods.

ECR Method of Process Improvement

Eliminate the operation – sometimes it is found to be not necessary or sometimes it is due to improvement of earlier operation.
Combine operations with earlier one or latter one.
Rearrange the sequence of operations


Processing Operations Analysis

Examples in the book
Manufacturing operations can be improved by alternatives related to proper melting or forging temperatures, cutting speeds or tool selection.
Examples related to vacuum molding, plating and plastic resin drying are given in the book.
Eliminating Flashing in Castings (Die)
Flashing in die castings occurs due to escape of air.
Removing the air in mould with a vacuum pump eliminated flashing.
Removing Foam in High-Speed Plating
Spraying or showering the surface to be painted resulted in a 75% reduction.
Drying Plastic Resin
Letting the resin dry a little at a time by allowing it to float to the surface resulted in a 75% reduction of electric power consumption.


Analysis of Inspection Operations

Shingo said normal inspection is judgment inspection.
It separates good and defective items.
Rework done on defective items if possible
Informative inspection asks for process improvement.
It is like medical examination that leads to treatment.
Statistical Process Control
SPC is sampling based informative inspection.
But Shingo says even it is not sufficient to assure zero defects.
To assure zero defects we need to inspect every item but at low cost per item.
Shingo’s Suggestions
Informative Inspections

Self Inspection
Successive Inspection
Enhanced Self Inspection – Inspection enhanced with devices  - poka-yoke

Example 2.4 – Vacuum Cleaner Packing
Cleaner along with attachments and leaflets to be packed.
When a leaflet is taken from the pile,  a limit switch is operated.
When attachments are taken from the container, a limit switch is operated.
Then only, the full package is allowed to be sealed.
Principle
The purpose of inspection is prevention of the defect.
Quality can be assured when it is built in at the process and when inspection provides immediate and accurate feedback at the source to prevent the defective item to go further.
Self Inspection
It provides the most immediate feedback to the operator.
He can improve the process and also rework on the item.
Disadvantage inherent.
There is potential for lack of objectivity.
He may accept items that ought to be rejected.
Successive Inspection
The operator inspects the item for any defect in the previous operation before processing it.
Shingo says, when this was introduced defects dropped to 0.016% in Moriguchi Electric Company in television production
Inspection enhanced by Poka Yoke
Human operation and inspection can still make errors unintentionally.
Poka Yoke will take care of such errors.
Ex: Left and right covers are to be made from similar components with a hole in different places.
The press was fitted with a poka yoke which does right cover pressing only when the hole is in proper place.
Source Inspection
This is answering the question: What is the source of the defect in the process/operation?
Two types proposed.
Vertical
Horizontal
Source Inspection – Vertical, Horizontal
Vertical source inspection traces problems back through the process flow to identify and control conditions external to the operation that affect quality.
Horizontal source inspection identifies and controls conditions within an operation that affect quality.
Poka-yoke Inspection Methods
Poka-yoke achieves 100% inspection through mechanical or physical control.
Poka-yoke can either be used as a control or a warning.
As a control it stops the process so the problem can be corrected.
As a warning, a buzzer or flashing lamp alerts the worker to a problem that is occurring.

Three types of control poka-yoke
Contact method - identify defects by whether or not contact is established between the device and some feature of the product's shape or dimension
Fixed value method - determines whether a given number of movements have been made


Motion step method - determines whether the established steps or motions of a procedure are followed

Choosing/Designing  Poka Yoke
First decide stage of inspection – Self or Successive
Second – Type of regulation
Control or warning.
Third decide Error Sensing type – Contact, fixed number or motion step


Analysis of Transport Operations

Transport within the plant is a cost that does not add value.
Hence real improvement of the process eliminates the transport function as much as possible.
This involves improving the layout of process.

Ex – 7. Transport Improvement
Tokai Iron Works – process layout -  presses, bending machines, embossing
Layout Change: Flow based layout.
A 60 cm wide belt conveyor with ten presses on either side.
WIP reduced. Production time shortened. Delays disappeared.
200% increase in productivity.
Principle
Only after opportunities for layout improvement have been exhausted should the unavoidable transport work that remains be improved through mechanization.

Eliminating - Storage Operations (Delay)


Process Delay – Permanent storage – Whole lot is waiting
Lot Delays – Temporary storage – One item is being processed. Other items in the lot waiting.
Another classification is storage on the factory floor and storage in a controlled store.
Eliminating - Storage Operations (Delay)
There are three types of accumulations between processes:

E storage - resulting from unbalanced flow between processes  (engineering)
C storage - buffer or cushion stock to avoid delay in subsequent processes due to machine breakdowns or rejects (control)
S storage - safety stock; overproduction beyond what is required for current control purposes

Eliminating E-Storage

E-storage is due to engineering/planning/design of the production-distribution  system
This can be eliminated through leveling quantities, which refers to balancing flow between high and low capacity processes and synchronization.

Leveling would mean running high-capacity machines at less than 100% capacity, in order to match flow with lower capacity machines that are already running at 100% on short interval basis.
At Toyota, the quantity to be produced is determined solely by order requirements (Takt time).

Principle
Presence of high capacity machines should not be used to justify large lot processing and resulting inventory.
Process capacity should serve customer requirements/production requirements and should not determine them
synchronization.
The lots especially one piece lot is processed without delay in a flow.
It is efficient production scheduling that ensures that once quantities are leveled (output is matched), inventories do not pile at any stage due to scheduling conflicts.
Synchronize the entire process flow.


Eliminating C storage - Cushion

Cushion stocks compensate for:
machine breakdowns,
defective products,
downtime for tool and die changes and
sudden changes in production scheduling.

Eliminate Cushion Storage
Prevent machine breakdowns:
Determining the cause of machine failure at the time it occurs, even if it means shutting down the line temporarily.
Total Productive Maintenance movement.

Eliminate Cushion Storage
Zero Defect Movement.
Total quality management.
Use better inspection processes:
Self Inspection.
Successive Inspection.
Enhancement to inspection through Poka Yoke
Eliminate Cushion Storage
Eliminate Lengthy setups and tool changes
Implement SMED to eliminate long set-up times and tool changes
Running smaller batch sizes to allow for quick changes in production plans

Eliminate Cushion Storage
Absorb Change in Production Plan
Running smaller batch sizes allows for quick changes in production plans without disturbing flow production to significant extent.

Eliminating Safety (S) storage

Safety stock is kept not to take care of any predicted problem but to provide additional security
It may guard against delivery delays, scheduling errors, indefinite production schedules, etc.
Ex. 10 Delivery to stores
In example 2.10 Shingo mentions a company wherein vendors supply to store and from store components are supplied to assembly line.
Shingo suggested that vendors should directly supply the day’s requirements to assembly floor and in case of any problem, components in the store can be used.
Less Need for Safety Stock Observed
That practice led to the observation that very less safety stock is needed in the store.

Shingo recommends keeping a small controlled stock that is only used when the daily or hourly scheduled delivery fails or falls behind.
In case of unexpected defects also it can be used.


The safety stock can then be replenished when the scheduled materials arrive, but the supply of materials due for the process go directly to the line, rather than normally going into storage first.
This is the essence of the just-in-time supply method.


Eliminating lot delays
While lots are processed, the entire lot, except for the one piece being processed, is in storage (is idle).
The greatest reduction in production time can be achieved when transport lot sizes are reduced to just one; the piece that was just worked on.

SMED
Using SMED (single-minute exchange of dies), set up time is decreased so large lot sizes are no longer necessary to achieve machine operating efficiencies.
SMED facilitates one item lot sizes.




Layout Improvement - Flow
Transportation changes can be accomplished through flow  layout and using gravity feed Chutes which result in shorter production cycles and decreases in transport man-hours.

Reducing Cycle Time
Generally, semi-processed parts are held between processes 80% of the time in a production cycle time.
It quantity leveling is used and synchronization of flow is created, the cycle time can be reduced by 80%.
By shifting to small lot sizes will further reduce cycle time.


TPS – Reduction of Delays or Storage
Methods of reducing production time delays (JIT) is the foundation of Toyota Production System.
It clearly brings down production cycle time and thereby offers small order to delivery time.

Process Improvements in Toyota
Mixed model small lot production was attempted in Toyota to compete with American manufacturers.
First, inefficiencies in processing operations, inspection operations and transport operations were removed.
Then storage operations were attacked and inventories eliminated.
Toyota surpassed American manufacturers.

Now TPS is promoted as Lean System



Chapter 2 End

Ch. 3 Improving Operations

Operation may be classified as follows:

Set up operations - preparation
Principal operations - performance
Margin allowances - machine breaks
Personal allowances - worker breaks


Improving Setup
SMED

Improving principal operations
The easiest way to improve principal operations is to separate the worker from the machine.
Reduce involvement of man in machine running and production.
This involves the "one worker, many process" theory.
One worker attends 5-6 machines,
The principle is that cost reduction is more important than high machine operating rates.
Machines should not unnecessarily function and produce excess inventory.
But the operable time of the machine should be high.
Whenever needed machine must be ready for production.

Autonomation
Machine detects problem and stops.
Workers correct the problem.
The next step is to make the machine correct the problem

Improving margin allowances

Main operations are automated by marginal activities like removing chips, feeding materials and stocking products are still done by hand by men.
They also need to be automated.
Lubrication: Consider automatic lubrication, use of oil impregnated metals etc.
Cutting oil – Consider automatic oiling or cutting without oil.
Chip removal – Consider powdering chips or automatic lubrication and chip removal.

Workshop allowances

Automate the following:
Automate feeding for materials.
Automate product storage.
By adopting the SMED system, Toyota achieved dramatic reductions in setup time and inventory cost.
Adding multi-machine handling and autonomation further increased productivity.

Chapters 2 & 3 to be used in analysis of value stream map (VSM)

Toyota Production System Industrial Engineering (TPS IE) Part 2

Summary of Remaining Chapters of the Book

http://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2013/12/toyota-production-system-industrial.html

Updated 11.7.2024,  11.9.2022,  16.2.2022,  11 July 2021,  14 June 2020,   21 August 2019,  22 August 2017,  9 Sep 2015
First published 9 Sep 2014

Saturday, April 29, 2023

The SMED System: Shigeo Shingo's Detailed Explanation

New. Popular E-Book on IE,

Introduction to Modern Industrial Engineering.  #FREE #Download.

In 0.1% on Academia.edu. 3600+ Downloads so far.

https://academia.edu/103626052/INTRODUCTION_TO_MODERN_INDUSTRIAL_ENGINEERING_Version_3_0




This lesson is part of Analysis of Flow - Delays sub-module of process industrial engineering or process improvement. Reducing set up time will reduce batch sizes and therefore reduces delay in flow of material in a process. Hence analysis of setups and reducing setup time/cost is important for productivity improvement


Set up Time reduction was an issue of interest right from the Taylor's time. It was developed into a specific procedure by Shigeo Shingo.

F.W. Taylor on Quick Setups


Taylor want a foreman to be incharge of setup activities and gave him the responsibility for doing setups in quick time. Taylor advocated study of motions of men and eliminating unnecessary motions in all activities.

The gang boss has charge of the preparation of all work up to the time that the piece is set in the machine. It is his duty to see that every man under him has at all times at least one piece of work ahead at his machine, with all the jigs, templates, drawings, driving mechanism, sling chains, etc., ready to go into his machine as soon as the piece he is actually working on is done. The gang boss must show his men how to set their work in their machines in the quickest time, and see that they do it. He is responsible for the work being accurately and quickly set, and should be not only able but willing to pitch in himself and show the men how to set the work in record time.



H.B. Maynard on Setup Analysis


In this article, the issue of collecting drawings, materials and tools as well as instructions from appropriate persons are discussed. Then the machine set up and loading of  the work piece are discussed. After the processing operation is over, the work piece has to be unloaded and it has to be moved to the next stage. At the end of the day, tools etc. are to be returned. In the process, care has to be taken to see that equipment is kept in proper order. All issues are raised in the check list of questions given below. 

________________________


Before any work can be done, certain preliminary or "make- ready" operations must be performed. These include such elements as getting tools and drawings, getting material and instructions, and setting up the machine or laying out material and tools about the workplace. When the operation itself has been completed, certain clean up or " put-away " elements must be done such as putting away tools and drawings, removing finished material, and cleaning up the workplace or machine.

Questions on "Make-ready" and "Put-away" Elements. The procedure followed to perform the " make-ready" and "put- away" elements should be questioned closely, particularly on small-quantity work, for these operations are usually fairly long. Many of them carry the operator away from his workplace. This is undesirable for several reasons, and the necessity for trips to other parts of the department should be minimized. The arrangement of the setup or the workplace layout is of primary importance, and the simple rules governing efficient workplace layouts should be clearly understood.

Typical questions which will lead to suggestions for improvement in this connection are as follows :

1. How is the job assigned to the operator?

3. How are instructions imparted to the operator?

4. How is material secured?

5. How are drawings and tools secured?

6. How are the times at which the job is started and finished checked?

7. What possibilities for delays occur at drawing room, tool- room, storeroom, or time clerk's office?

8. If operator makes his own setup, would economies be gained by providing special setup men?

9. Could a supply boy get tools, drawings, and material?

10. Is the layout of the operator J s locker or tool drawer orderly so that no time is lost searching for tools or equipment?

11. Are the tools that the operator uses in making his setup adequate?

12. Is the machine set up properly?

13. Is the machine adjusted for proper feeds and speeds?

15. If vises, jigs, or fixtures are used, are they securely clamped to the machine?

18. Is material properly positioned?

19. Are tools prepositioned?

21. What must be done to  put away all equipment used?

22. Can trip to return tools to toolroom be combined with trip to get tools for next job?

23. How thoroughly should workplace be cleaned?

24. What disposal is made of scrap, short ends, or defective parts?

25. If operation is performed continuously, are preliminary operations of a preparatory nature necessary the first thing in the morning?

26. Are adjustments to equipment on a continuous operation made by the operator?

27. How is material supply replenished?

28. If a number of miscellaneous jobs are done, can similar jobs be grouped to eliminate certain setup elements?

29. How are partial setups handled?

30. Is the operator responsible for protecting workplace over- night by covering it or locking up valuable material?


Make Ready. The methods followed in giving out jobs differ widely throughout industry. Where the same operation is worked day after day, the problem is not encountered; but on more miscellaneous work, some procedure for telling an operator what job he is to work upon next must be provided.

When the operator has received notification in one way or another of the job he is to do, he must next secure drawings, tools, and material. The way in which this is done also varies widely. In some cases, the operator must hunt everything for himself. In others, he goes to a tool- or drawing-room window and waits while an attendant gets what he requires. In still other cases, everything is brought to him, and he does not have to leave his work station.

The exact procedure that is followed will depend upon existing conditions; but if it is possible to work out an economical system for furnishing the operator with what he needs at his work station, it is desirable to do so. Besides reducing costs, this procedure increases the amount of time the equipment is utilized and thus increases the productive capacity of the plant. Often a low-rated worker can do the errands of the operators and bring tools, drawings, and materials.

Where the group system is used and no supply boy is available, the group leader commonly gets all necessary supplies and tools. By getting the necessary items for several jobs at one time, he is able to effect economies.

If a conveyer system specially designed is used, the jobs may be dispatched by the production department in the order wanted, and all material, tools, and drawings can be sent out at the same time on the conveyer. Thus the amount of time spent by the operator in getting ready to make the setup or workplace layout is reduced to a minimum.

The manner in which instructions are furnished with regard to how the job should be done is worthy of careful consideration. Instruction sheets can be used to instruct operators and, under certain conditions, their use is not too costly.  It gives complete and detailed instructions.

Setup. The setup of the machine and of any tools, jigs, or fixtures used should be studied in detail. The correctness and the adequacy of the setup should first be considered, followed by a brief review of the methods employed to make it. The correct setup is fixed by the nature of the operation, the nature of the part, the requirements of the job, and the mechanical features of the machine. Sometimes, it is possible to do a job in more than one way, and care should be taken to ascertain that the best way is being used.

When the setup is being made, certain tools are usually required. These should be suitable for the purpose. If each operator must make his own setup, he should be provided with the necessary tools. If only one or two wrenches are furnished to a group of 10 operators, for example, the time lost in hunting the wrenches and in waiting for a chance to use them will usually far offset the cost of additional equipment.

If setup men are employed to setup machines ahead of the operators, their setup work is to them fairly repetitive work, because they are performing the same elements day after day. It will therefore be desirable to treat it as such and to furnish the setup men with special-purpose quick-acting tools.


Put Away. The put-away elements usually consume less time than the make-ready elements. Tools are put away, the setup is torn down, and the workplace is more or less thoroughly cleaned up. Usually, some of the put-away elements can be combined with some of the make-ready elements for the next operation.

Tools for one operation, for example, may be returned to the toolroom when the tools for the next operation are obtained. The procedure that will prove most economical for the put-away elements will depend to a large extent upon the manner in which the make-ready elements are performed.

Where a number of similar operations are performed on a machine, it is sometimes possible to use 'the same or part of the same setup on two or more jobs. A part that is common to several assemblies may be ordered separately for each and appear on several different orders. If these orders are grouped, one setup will care for them all. Again, in milling-machine work, for example, it may be possible to use the same cutter for several different jobs. The elements of "get cutter from toolroom" "place cutter on machine",  "remove cutter from machine" and "return cutter to toolroom" will thus be performed but once for the several jobs.

Where possibilities of this sort exist, provision should be made when setting up the make-ready and put-away routine so that the economies will be made. If the operator does not know what job he is to do next, if he must completely tear down his setup before going for another job, and if neither the foreman nor the dispatcher attempts to group similar jobs, advantage cannot be taken of partial setups. This is wasteful, of course, and every attempt should be made to secure the benefit of partial setups. Whether or not the operator is paid for the complete setup or only for that part which he actually makes depends upon the difficulty in controlling setups and upon whether or not the saving is due to the operator's own initiative.  In either case, more time is available for productive work which is a distinct gain.

Shigeo Shingo


The efficiency of setup requires two things on the part of operators:

1. Knowledge relating to the structure and function of the machinery and equipment, as well as a thorough acquaintence with tools, blades, dies, jigs, etc.

2. Skill in mounting and removing these items, and also in measuring, centering, adjusting, and calibrating after trial runs.


The History of SMED

In 1950, Shingo was conducting an efficiency improvement survey at Toyo Kogyo's Mazda plant. As the large body-molding presses of 350, 750 and 800 tons were declared as bottlenecks, Shingo did a production study.

There was an incident of a missing bolt and one hour was wasted in finding the bolt. Shingo had written that gave him the idea that external set operations have to set up as standard procedures and one has to make sure that all items required for set up are there before one starts the set up procedure. Shingo established the external set up procedure of making all items required for a set up  and the efficiency was raised by 50% and the bottle neck problem disappeared.

The Second Idea

In 1957, Shingo was studying the operation of a large planer which is machining diesel engine beds. He noticed that centering and dimensioning of the engine bed had to be done and was being conducted on the planer table only. He came with the idea of buying an extra planer table on which this activity can be done while on the machine a job is getting machined. When the job was completed, the table was pushed out and the second table was pushed in ready with the job. This solution resulted in 40% increase in productivity.

The Third Important Event

In 1969, Shingo studied the set operation of 1,000 ton press at Toyoto Motor Company/s plant. The setup time was four hours and it was known that Volkswagen in Germany was doing the same set up in two hours. Shingo in association with Toyota engineers have identified the external setup operations and internal setup operations and improve the process to a time of 90 minutes. According to Shingo, it took six months of effort to reach that stage.

At this stage, Toyota management thought of a challenging goal. Can be reduced drastically to only  three minutes? This challenge resulted in the inspiring insight in Shingo. Can we convert much more internal activity (setup activity that was being done on the machine) to external activity. So a search began for eliminating activities from internal setup activity to move them the external activity. Shingo had written that 8 ideas came in quick succession and they developed these 8 ideas in 3 months time to reach the single digit setup time. So Shingo remarked that it took 19 years of time to make a drastic improvement to the setup operations.

The SMED System - Book by Shigeo Shingo - Chapter Summaries 


Foreword

SMED system is the most essential method for achieving Just-In-Time Production. SMED system will revolutionize existing production systems and I hope you will practice it after reading this book.

Introduction

In many factories, diversified low-volume production is a problem. The main difficulty is the setup operations and adjustments required - calibration, switching of tools or dies etc. Frequent setups of course are necessary to produce a large variety of goods in small lots.

But now I can tell you, you can cut your setup time and increase productivity. You can do setups in three minutes for tasks which had taken 3 hours earlier. The theory and techniques are made available to you in this book. Japanese industrial engineers have long understood the need to reduce setup times and many examples are made available by them in books. But in this book for the first time principles are provided so that you can apply them to your situation even though it does not match any of the previous examples or applications.

Why the setup times remained high for long. Managers and industrial engineers neglected the task and left it to the skill of workers.

People have to realize that high volume production and large lot production are the same. Even high volume production can be achieved through small lots and economy of manufacturing can be realized.  Traditional production planning assumes inventory as inevitable but new production system based on SMED works on the concept of confirmed production and eliminates inventory.

It took 19 long years for me to develop the SMED system.

Chapter 1 The Structure of Production


Production activities may best be understood as a process consisting of operations.

A process refers to a continuous flow by which raw materials are converted into finished goods. An operation is action performed by men, machine or equipment on raw materials, or intermediate or finished goods (for example packing). A process can have one or more operations.

Manufacturing processes can be further divided into four distinct phases (traditional IE categories)

1. Processing (termed as operation) 2. Inspection  3. Transportation 4. Storage.

The storage phase can be further categorised into:
1. Storage of raw materials.
2. Storage of finished goods
3. Lot waiting for process: The entire lot is in a queue before a machine
4. Waiting for a lot: Some of items of the lot are yet to be processed and some are processed.

Each operation on a lot will have preparation and clearing. These are termed setup operations.
The principal operation carried out on workpieces include essential operation, auxiliary operation like loading the workpiece and removing it and margin allowances (activities) that irregularly happen like sweeping up cuttings and personal activities of the operator like taking rest for fatigue and drinking water etc.

It is important to note that there are setup operations in inspection, transportation and storage also.

Chapter 2. Setup Operations in the Past


The blind spot: The unspoken assumption that drastic reductions in setup time are not possible. But with the development of SMED, the concept of economic lot size has diappeared from the profit-engineering agenda. Moreover, SMED has substantially reduced the level of skill required for setups and production operators themselves can do the setup.

3. Fundamentals of SMED


In the spring of 1950, Shingo was conducting an efficiency improvement survey at Toyo Kogyo's Mazda plant. At the presses were bottleneck machines, Shingo conducted a production analysis and observed a die change.  As he observed the time wasted after the machine was stopped for setup change, it dawned to him that setup operations fundamentally were two types: Internal setups which are to be done after a machine is stopped and external setups which can be conducted when the machine is in operation. The external set up were identified and only internal setups were done when the machine is stopped. The setup time reduced by 50%.

The first step of SMED was discovered and Shingo started advising companies on improving setups.

The second insight

Shingo was doing study of open-sided planer at the Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Shipyard for methods improvement. He observed that marking-off procedure for centering and dimensioning the engine bed ws being conducted on the planer table and it was taking significant time. The idea came came to install a second planer table and perform the setup operation on it separately. Then the table was shifted in less time and it saved time and increased productivity.

The third experience

In 1969, the divisional manager of body shop at Toyota Motor Company told Shingo that they were taking 4 hours to make a die change and they know that in Volkswagen they were doing in two hours. Shingo worked with them to separate internal and external setup items and got the die change time reduced to one and half hours.

After a month, Shingo was informed that management want the setup time to go to three minutes. Shingo was strartled but challenged. The thinking led to the idea that some more internal elements can be converted into external elements. In three months, three minute goal was reached and Shingo says, he named the method SMED.

This SMED concept then spread to all types of setups in Toyota.

Basic steps in the Setup Procedure

1. Preparation, checking of all required items, tools and materials   30%
2. Removing old tools and mounting new tools 5%
3. Centering, dimensioning and setting other conditions 15%
4. Trial runs and adjustments 50%
5. Returning Old tools - Negligible

The time taken for trail runs and adjustments can be shortened by improving the prior process of centering, dimension and setting.

Basic Steps of SMED

Separating Internal and External Setup
Converting Internal Operations to External Operations
Improving Internal Setup Operations
Improving External Operations

4. Techniques for Applying SMED





Separating Internal and External Setup

Doing External Setup Operations Efficiently - Preliminary Steps

Use a checklist

Make a list of all the parts required with names and specifications and make sure that they are there before the setup. For it to happen without any shortcoming, Shingo recommended that a drawing is made with all the parts pictures and keep the parts on those drawing.

Then there has to be one more list that specifies details of pressure, temperature and other settings that are part of external setup. One has to go through this checklist and ensure that every item is having the required specification and also functioning. These list of items and checklists have to be separate for every machine.

The old die and related items should be transported back either after the setup is completed or by people who are specific to transportation. The machine should not be made to idle due to the transport operation of old die and related items.


Converting Internal Operations to External Operations

The first step in converting internal operations to external operations is to create operating conditions of the dies externally. Then only internal operations are to push the dies and attach them to ram and body.


Preheating Dies

Old practice was to heat dies in die casting by injecting hot metal between them. Instead of that if dies were preheated using gas or electric heat externally, 30 minutes could be saved.

Standardization of dies of various sizes or items on a machine can be done by shape standardization to reduce setup time. But the dies of even small parts can be large because of that. Instead Shingo suggested function standardization.

Function Standardization

What are the functions in attaching die to machine? Clamping, centering, dimensioning, expelling,grasping, and maintaining loads.

Efficient function standardization requires that for each die, the function providing features are only standardized as required by examining the die feature by feature or element by element.

Clamping height can be changed by adding shims to smaller dies. Centering can be done centering jigs. The dies can be made as a set and they can be inserted and withdrawn like a casette so that die inserting time can be only 20 seconds. Various locating elements can be used to adjust the dies in the required positions externally.


5 Applying SMED to Internal Operations

Improving Internal Operations or Reducing Time of Internal Operations

Implementation of Parallel Operations

Die-change operations on plastic molding machines, and die-casting machines and large presses require work both at front and at the back of the machine. If two work parallelly  one at the back and one at the front lot of time is saved.

The Use of Function Clamp

The length of the bolt should be determined such that only one turn is required for fastening or loosening. Such bolt will be called functional clamp.

Examples of One Turn Attachments

The Pear Shaped Hole Method

The U Shaped Washer Method

The Split Thread Method

The U-Slot Method

The Clamp Method

One Motion Methods
  Cams and clamps
  Wedges, tapered pins and knock pins
   springs

Magnetism and Vacuum Suction

Interlocking Methods
(Punch and die assembly for making interlocking integral fasteners - Patent No. US2924312)

Instead of fastening, many times, two pieces can be interlocked and it is sufficient.

Interlocking Method for Press Dies

In a press, the upper die is attached to the machine ram and the lower die is attached to the machine tool. Why there should be same number and diameter of bolts in both sides. While the die attached to the ram has to be supported against gravity, the die attached to the machine bed need not be so supported. Shingo suggests holding plates and cradles for the holding plate to hold the die.


Seeing is believing. Watch in YouTube video die changes in less than 9 minutes
SMED - YouTube Videos


Related Development:

SMED 2.0 - April 25, 2023 by Christoph Roser.
https://www.allaboutlean.com/smed-2-0/

Design for changeovers
http://etidweb.tamu.edu/hsieh/ENTC410/Design%20for%20Mass%20Customerization/DesignForChangeOver.pdf
The paper is on original equipment manufacturer making design of machine that facilitates quick setup changes











Ud 29.4.2023,  10.10.2022,  9.10.2021
Pub 9,12.2013

Saturday, April 23, 2022

Toyota Production System - Industrial Engineering - Shigeo Shingo


The success of Toyota in cost reduction, productivity improvement, and international competitiveness and its celebrated Toyota Production System, fulfilled the dream of Yoichi Ueno (that Japan can guide US in improved practices of efficiency improvement). The success of #Toyota and the World Class #TPS was  built on the sustained efforts many Japanese persons who understood Taylor and Gilbreth's writings and improvised them in implementing them in Japanese companies.



Toyota Production System Industrial Engineering (TPS IE) - Part 2



Shigeo Shingo said 80% of the TPS is waste elimination that is industrial engineering, 15% production management and 5% kanban communications. In other words, we can say,  "Toyota production system (TPS) is 80% process improvement (Jidoka) and 20% production planning improvement (JIT)." 

Based on the above statement of Shigeo Shingo and the description of Jidoka and JIT provided in many books, I interpret Jidoka as process improvement. JIT is production quantity planning and information sharing.

Toyota production system was developed by managers of Toyota with major contribution from Taiichi Ohno by implementing waste elimination methods advocated by industrial engineering. Taiichi Ohno specially applauds industrial engineering as profit making engineering for Toyota. Shingo builds up on the Ohno's explanation of TPS by clearly bringing out the role of industrial engineering in the development of TPS in his book.

Summary of Shigeo Shingo's Book - A Study of the Toyota Production System

Toyota Production System Industrial Engineering (TPS IE) Part 1


Summary of Chapters 1 to 3

Remaining Chapters

Chapter 4  Conclusions of Developing Non-Stock Production 


The principal feature of the TPS is eliminating the total cost associated with inventory - the total of inventory carrying cost, setup or order cost and shortage cost. Hence, TPS is described as stockless or non-stock system.

Stock occur due to two reasons:

Naturally Occurrence:

Stock accumulates because of
* Incorrect market demand forecasts
* Overproduction just to be on the safe side due to likely defects
* Lot production (Batch production)
* Due technological and capacity constraints in certain processes. Heat treatment in three shifts but doing further operations in one shift.

Stock that get accumulated due to inefficiencies in the production system
* Production cycle being longer than order-to-delivery cycle.
* Stock produced in advance to take care of extra demand in the future
*Stock produced to compensate for delays in inspection and transport
* Stock produced to compensate for machine breakdowns
*Stock maintained as buffer between machines to take care of defectives
*Stock generated as per calculation of economic batch quantity to take care of high setup or order cost.

Stock reduction was carried out rationally in Toyota production system.

Three strategies can be pursued to approach the idea of non-stock production.

* Reduce the production cycle
* Eliminate the breakdowns - do preventive maintenance to make the machine available all the time for production (Total productive maintenance)
*Eliminate defect - zero defects through process improvement - detect the reasons for defects and remove
them from the process. 
* Reduce setup times and reduce batch quantity to single piece.
Stock

Chapter 5 The Principles of the Toyota Production System


The Toyota Production System is 80 percent waste elimination (Industrial Engineering), 15 percent production system and only 5 percent kanban communication.

Some Commonly Used Terms in TPS

Waste of Overproduction

There are two types of overproduction:
* Making more than required quantity for a delivery period.
* Making a product before it is needed.

Many systems are happy to produce an item before its delivery date and feel comfortable. But Toyota system does not want both types of overproduction.

Just-in-time

JIT also means just-on-time. An item should be made available when it is required not before or after the required time.

Separation of Worker from the Machine

The whole productivity movement of Toyota was based on the fact that per worker production of cars in America was 10 times that of Toyota company. Toyota wanted to improve their productivity and therefore concentrated on reducing the time spent by a worker on the machine. Machines must work without the assistance of the worker as much as possible. Jidoka or autonomation is the name given to this activity. Along with JIT or stockless production, separation of worker from the machine forms the two pillars of Toyota Production System.

Low Utilization Rates

Toyota's machine-output ratio is two to three times  that of similar companies. This could be due to flow production systems or due to planned extra machine capacity to take care of extra demand. But one must always remember that Toyota's main goal is cost reduction and every decision in Toyota is subjected to engineering economic evaluation.

Multi-machine Handling

In 1955, 700 workers were handling 3500 machines. Hence sometimes machines are idle because worker is busy with other machines and cannot load the machines. Toyota permits machine idle times but it does not permit man idle time. The reason is that a machine costs $500 per month but a man costs twice or thrice more.

Equipment Planning and Low Operating Rates

As low operating rate is expected, Toyota buys less expensive machines. But it improves the machines to suit its requirements continuously.  Because in normal times machines have excess capacity or low operating rates,  peak demand can be handled by hiring temporary workers.

Perform Operation and Remove the Defective Part

Whenever a problem appears, Toyota insists on proper diagnosis of the root cause and demands that an operation is done to remove the replace the defective part of the process. It is not content  with the temporary cure of rework on the defective workpiece.

Fundamentals of Toyota Production System


Adopting a Non-Cost Principle

Elimination of Waste

Eliminating waste through fundamental process improvements
               Processing purpose evaluation and rationalization
               Inspection purpose evaluation and rationalization
               Transport purpose evaluation and rationalization
               Delay reason evaluation and rationalization
               Storage purpose evaluation and rationalization

Eliminating waste through fundamental operation improvement
               Setup improvement
               Auxiliary improvement
               Job allowance improvement
               Workshop allowance improvement
               Improving processing and essential operations

Ask the "five W's and one H" and "Why?" Five Times

              What -  What is being produced  - Is it required - Value engineering
               Who - Men, machines, tools and jigs used for the production
               When - Time  - Production planning also comes here.
                Where - Space (Layout)
              Why - rational for the use of everything used in production. Because it provides opportunities for improvement.
              How - The methods - motion used by man, speed and feeds used by machines

At Toyota specially, 5 Whys are used to identify root causes for defects and appearance of problems.

Mass Production and Large Lot Production are not same

Mass production is beneficial. Large lot production has extra cost. It can be reduced with SMED.

Order-based Production

Characteristics of Order-based Production

To take care of fluctuations in the orders, Toyota sets basic productions capacity at minimum demand level and handles increases through overtime and the use of excess machine capacity and temporary workers.

Overtime: There are four hour breaks between the two shifts and overtime can be given in either shift as needed.

Excess capacity: During the minimum load, many workers manage ten machines but up to 50% capacity only. As demand increases, temporary workers are hired and machines can work at 100% capacity. But machine work has to be simplified and standardized so that temporary workers can be trained in three days and they operate the machines.

Strong Market Research

Toyota does spend on market research to know market requirements. Twice in a year 60,000 people are surveyed. Five or six additional surveys are done in a year.

Production Planning

Long term planning is done.
Annual planning is done.
Monthly planning is done.
Daily planning is done. Daily planning based on actual orders. The actual orders are informed to the first stage of assembly section and they draw the components as required from component supply stages.

Toyota's Supermarket System

In the supermarket system of Toyota, stocking is triggered by actual demand for the components for a daily requirement.

Differences between Ford and Toyota Systems

Large lot versus small lot production

Mixed model assembly in Toyota system

More consistent one piece flow in Toyota system

Chapter 6  Mechanics of the Toyota Production System


Improving the Process - Schedule control and Just-in-Time

Toyota makes efforts and reduces production cycle.

Seven Principles for Shortening the Production Cycle

Reduce process delays
Reduce lot delays
Reducing production time
Employ layout, line forming, and the full work control system
Synchronize operations and absorb deviations
Establishing tact time
Ensure product flow between processes

Adopting SMED


Elimination of Defects

Inspection to prevent defects must be practiced.

100% inspection must be adopted.

Poka-Yoke has to be used as a means for zero defects.

Eliminating Machine Breakdowns
It is also process improvement in TPS. Workers are asked to stop  a machine if there is some trouble. Supervisors are given training and are urged to try to keep machines running. When a trouble appears, a visual indication is given and all try to take care of the problem. Preventing recurrence is the motto of TPS.

Chapter 7 Mechanics of the TPS

Improving Process - Leveling and the Nagara System



What is Leveling?

Leveling is a method of balancing load and capacity in a way different from the traditional way.
For example if load on car assembly plant is 300,000 sets of model A, 600,000 sets of model B and 900,000 units of model C and capacity is 1,800,000 units, the traditional solution is  to make 300,000 sets of model A and 300,000 sets of model B in the first 10 days, 300,000 sets of model B and 300,000 sets of model c and in the next 10 days, and 600,000 units of model C in the last 10 days. The load is balanced at the month level, but it gives rise to inventories of various models and even shortages of some models.

 But Toyota followed a different way because it has as its aim prevention and reduction of over production. In the first 10 days, production of 100,000 units of model A, 200,000 units of model B and 300,000 units of model C are produced. We can see now that inventory will come down. It the 10 day planning/production period can be further reduced, all models are produced in much smaller periods the over production can further be reduced. Toyota uses this approaches and reduces the planning period in which all models are made further and further. This is called "mixed production" and on assembly line it is called "mixed model assembly."


Segmented Production

Making production plans for half a month(H), ten days (T), week (W) and Day (D) are segmented production plans.

Mixed Production and Tact Time

Toyota combines product A with 30 Seconds and product B with 25 seconds and specifies 55 seconds as tact time for A+B.


Nagara System

The nagara system facilitates one piece flow by laying out machines in the sequence of operations by transcending the earlier shop divisions and training and facilitating operators to operate multiple unrelated machines in sequence.

Smooth production flow, ideally one piece at a time, characterized by synchronization (balancing) of production processes and maximum use of available time; includes overlapping of operations where practical. A nagara production system is one in which seemingly unrelated tasks can be produced simultaneously by the same operator.

Nagara is multi-machine handling in a process or flow system. The operator works with two or more different machines.

The example given in the body refers to a spot welding operation, followed by a press operation and then a welding operation that attached the pressed part to a body.

Chapter 8 Mechanics of the TPS

Improving Operations


Operations concern the flow of equipment and operators in time and space. Improvements in operations have long been emphasized in the Toyota Production system.

Components of Operations

1. Preparation and after-adjustment
2. Principal operations
3. Marginal allowances

Preparation and After-Adjustment

Reduce them through SMED

Margin Allowances

Personal allowances - For fatigue and personal needs
Non-personal allowances -
Operational allowances: Oiling, clearing away chips etc.
Workplace related: parts arriving late and machine breakdowns

Standard Operation and Standard Operation Sheets

Standard operation implies optimization of work conditions by analyzing

What is produced
Who - persons, machines, tools,and jigs
How - Method - machine speeds and feeds, man's movements
Where - Layout of the equipment and man - Work Station Design
When - Standard time, and Schedule

Present
There has to be a standard operation sheet by the side of the machine using which new workers are trained.

Future:
The Toyota system demands that all work is done within standard time and supervisor is charged with the responsibility. He has to train the worker. Also supervisor is responsible for improvements.

Types of Standard Operating Charts

Capacity charts by part
Standard task combination
Task manual
Task instruction manual
Standard operating sheet

The topic of standard operations is discussed in more detail in
Standard Operation and Standard Operation Sheets in Toyota Production System

Improving Methods of Operation

The operation, which is a man-machine combination can be improved through:

1. Improvements in human motions
2. Improvement in machine movements - increasing machine cutting speeds, reducing time through simultaneous cutting on multiaxis machines, and using multiple turret heads to shorten tool replacements.
3. Mechanizing human motions.

Improving human motions

Motion study can be used to reduce the operation time or the operator time. Motion study improves the movements or motions made by the operator and also improves the arrangement of materials and tools. 5S movement of Japanese industry is basically the offshoot of principles of motion economy.

Items must be arranged neatly, they must be easily accessible and they must be uniformly aligned.

Improvements in Machine Movements

Examples include raising output by increasing machine cutting speeds, reducing time through simultaneous cutting on multi-axis machines, and using multiple turret heads to shorten tool replacement time. This could involve using faster cutting processes like milling in the place of slower process like shaping.

Mechanizing Human Motions

In Toyota, first the human motions are optimized and then mechanization is attempted. Whenever mechanization is thought of its economics are thoroughly investigated. Toyota insists on kaizen - good change.


Machine Layout and Worker Efficiency


Workers are stationed with in a U layout so that they can easily help one another in case of need. Toyota encourages workers to assist each other in case of need or necessity. It discourages island mentality.  The system requires each worker to learn the operations performed at the two processes adjacent to his or her own and help the others when needed.

Multiple Machine Handling Operations


In 1955 itself, Toyota operated 3,500 machines with only 700 workers.  So one worker operates five machines on an average. In recent years (1981), Toyota managers started advocating multi-process handling. In multiple machine handling, the worker may handling the same type of machines. But in multi-process handling, the worker will handling multiple machines in accordance with the flow of operations or process. The capability of multi-process handling by a worker improves the flow of the process and also improves productivity.

Shingo's Summary of the Toyota Production System - The Last Section of Chapter 8


Basic Features of the TPS


# Cost Reduction through Industrial Engineering methods (elimination of waste)
# Emphasis on non stock production - elimination of overproduction
# Emphasis on labor cost reduction through elimination of waste motions and use of minimal permanent manpower.
# Use of SMED to have low set up times and realize small lot production. Ideal: One piece flow.
# Use order based production
# Follow the rule quantity produced must be quantity ordered.

Process Features of TPS


# Active use of value engineering to optimize the design itself.
# Make effective use of division of labor in design of process
# Using Nagara system
# Inspection - depend on self inspection, successive inspection and poka-yoke
# Transportation - Use flow lay out through out the production system.
# Delay - All operations must have equal times as far as possible. Avoid process delay.
             - Lots must be small - Avoid lot delay

Operation Features of TPS

# Use of SMED and its advanced and automated form one touch setups
# Use autonomatic machines as much as possible rationally (based on engineering economic analysis)
# Use nagara system (machines laid out in flow and operators handling multiple machines in the flow line.
# Autonomate material loading and unloading
# Encourage cooperative  work and eliminate isolated person mentality. Operators have to help the upstream or downstream colleagues as needed and as possible.
# Actively pursue minimum manpower deployment in the production system.

Toyota production system brought two revolutionary changes in the production system thinking and practice.

First one is the thinking that market should pay cost plus profit. Toyota changed it to market expansion through cost reduction and price reduction achieved through identifying and eliminating waste from the product  and production system design and operation.

Second,  the traditional thinking was mass production in large lot based on forecasted demand and keeping inventories. Toyota changed it to small lot production based on no inventory and actual orders.

Based on the above two changes, Shingo concludes that Toyota Production System represents a revolution in production philosophy.


Chapter 9 The Evolution of the Kanban System



Kanban and Railway Tablet System


Ohno discussed the introduction of Kanban system with Shingo. Shingo remembered the tablet system in railways which is exchanged between the driver of the train and the station master. Until the tablet is put into a track switches, the station master cannot allow another train to get into the track segment. Similarly the station master removes the tablet from the next segment of the track and gives it to the driver. The driver cannot move from the station unless he was given the tablet. May be there is a system that will allow the tablet to be removed only when the earlier train completed its journey in the track segment. Shingo felt Kanban system was similar to it.

Then Shingo brings into discussion the order point formula.

Order point is equal to consumption during lead time plus the safety stock.
The batch quantity has to be more than the order point. Reduction in set up time allows the reduction in batch quantity and any reduction in production lead time results in reduction of order point. Thus each improvement in set up time can reduce batch quantity and resulting lead time reduction can reduce order point. Similarly, by attacking root causes that create the need for safety stocks like appearance of defects, machine breakdowns, worker absenteeism, material shortages can reduce safety stocks. Thus measures can be taken to reduce inventories in the system.

Supermarkets and the Kanban System

1. Consumers choose goods of their choice and take the items to the cash counter.
2. The store personnel restock, what has been removed by customers.

Using Kanban for communication is similar to the super market system.

Kanban meaning "Sign" in Japanese language has the three functions.

1. Identification tag - indicates what the product is.
2. Job instruction tag - indicates what is to be made, quantity and time
3. Transfer instruction tag - indicates where the item is to be delivered.

Kanban is also treated as a signal to make a pallet load of parts. Hence the number of kanbans or pallet loads permitted as work in process inventory is an important number.

Number of kanbans or pallet loads permitted as WIP (N) =
[Maximum stock permitted = Batch quantity + safety stock]/Capacity of one pallet (n)

In Toyota system, there are efforts to reduce WIP continuously to zero.

To make the lot size one and WIP zero various steps like implementing SMED, Minimum transport layouts, zero defect and zero breakdown programs etc. are necessary.

Regulatory Function of Kanban

Giving production instructions at the final assembly line allows the kanban system to make transmit the information on new car models (model required by the customers) automatically and easily to upstream processes.






Chapter 10. Elimination of the Seven Kinds of Waste


1. Processing


Value analysis and engineering needs to be made. Also purpose analysis needs to be done.

2. The waste of making defective products


Poka-yoke needs to be used to prevent defects. Self inspection and successive inspection are to be promoted.

3. Transport


Improve the layout and reduce the need for transport.

4. Delay


Use small lot sizes and minimize delay for the jobs. Allot multiple machines to workers such that there is no waiting time for them. If needed machines can be idle.

5. Inventory


Use SMED and one piece flow and reduce production cycles.

 

6. Wasted Motions


Do motion studies

7. Overproduction

Reduce production for inventory rationally. Use SMED and decrease lot sizes. Improve informative inspection and avoid defects. Maintain machines such that there are no breakdowns and machines are available production all the time. Produce just-in-time for stockless production.

Kanban Rules

1. A process withdraws parts from the preceding process as per Kanban instructions and removes the Kanban from the pallet and leave the kanban there.

2. The earlier process makes parts in the quantities and order specified in the kanban that they pick up from the storage bin.

3. Nothing is transported and nothing is made without kanban.

4. Kanban always accompanies the parts themselves (identification tag must always be present.

5. Every part placed on a pallet must be of acceptable quality.

6. Efforts are to be made to reduce WIP by reducing kanbans over time.

Extending the System to Parts Suppliers

Toyota did not order suppliers to supply on JIT basis. It implemented JIT in its plants over a period of 20 years and then helped suppliers to implement it over a period of 10 years. Suppliers did not suffer because of the change but benefited through increased profits.

TPS and MRP

Shingo said MRP is not committed to the fundamental improvements like SMED, Zero defects and Zero breakdowns like TPS.

Shingo gave the opinion that companies may use MRP after doing fundamental improvement to the system as done by Toyota.

Chapter 11 - The Future Course of the Toyota Production System


Shingo says people say Just on Time is better tern than Just in Time. But the JIT has become a popular term.

Shingo mentions some steps that companies can take to get orders early and thus increase order to delivery period.

* Solicit advance orders from previous users based on life expectancy of the purchased item.
* In the case of car, approach persons learning to drive.
* Approach people who are getting their building licenses or permissions
* Contact printing presses who prepare wedding invitations, find out the bride and bridegroom and propose various household appliances.

The above things point out to events that precede actual demand and action by sales people can give larger order-to-delivery period.

Of course, actions to reduce production cycle has to go on.

Companies have to move from SMED to One-Touch Setups

No-touch methods

Shingo points out that manufacture can be done in sets, so that one component is made after another component without the operator touching the machine. It means that even change of component is automated.

The Development of a Comprehensive Flow System

TPS presently uses supermarket system. Can it be eliminated and the entire system be made a flow system?

Extending mixed production to machine shop, presswork, welding, forging and casting.

Kanban System Developments

Shingo says he foresees further reduction in Kanbans between processes means less WIP.
Second,. Shingo says the Kanbans can go to further upstream processes instead of the preceding process and thus helping in cutting WIP further.

Developing low cost machines and implementing multi-process handling
It needs to be extended to all the production system.

Extending to Supplier Plants

Efforts will be made to spread the TPS to the entire supply chain.



Chapter 12  - Introducing Toyota Production System

Introducing and Implementing the Toyota Production System - Shigeo Shingo


Chapter 13. The Toyota Production System in Summary


1. The Minus-Cost Principle
2. Non-Stock (JIT) - The First Cornerstone of Waste Elimination
3. Toward Flow Operation
4. Shortening Setup Changeover Times
5. The Elimination of Breakdowns and Defects
6. Fusing Leveling and Non-Stock Production
7. Toward Comprehensive Integrated Flow Operations
8. Labor Cost Reduction (Autonomation): The Second Cornerstone of Waste Elimination
9. From Mechanization to Autonomation
10. Maintaining and Developing Standard Operations
11. Toward a Kanban System

Chapter 14 Afterword


A thesis will have antithesis in dialectics.
There can be a compromise between the two to satisfy both the groups at a point in time.

But Shingo says, the proponents of thesis can try sublation.

What is sublation?


In it's basic meaning, it stands for raising something, from a lower place to a higher place.  Hegel, the famous proponent of dialectics, uses meaning and advocates the need to take the original thesis to a higher level, by preserving what is good in it and improving the disadvantages indicated by the antithesis.

Shingo gives the example that non-stock required deliveries from suppliers every two hours.  The opposing argument pointed out that truck efficiency of the supplier or from the supplier end will go down drastically and will result in increased cost. This disadvantage assumes that one truck will carry the load of one supplier. The sublated solution was that a truck was going to various suppliers and collecting material from them. So trucks were loaded to capacity and trucking cost was not allowed to go up. Thus a higher-level plan involving a totally new method - frequent mixed load deliveries emerged.

The disadvantage of smaller lot sizes was tackled by reduction of set up cost through SMED.

The sublation approach is used in many problems in Toyota.

The primary features of the Toyota production are:
1. Elimination of waste based on the belief that a company's only legitimate source of profits is cost reduction.
2. Satisfy demand through order based non-cost production.

The TPS has been compared to squeezing water from a towel thought to be dry. Many people settle for placing that towel under sun to dry further. But there are some people who squeeze the towel further and bring out some more water. Similarly there are many who eliminate waste that everyone recognizes as waste. Certain problems are allowed to exist in companies are necessary evils and people have become hostage to them. But in TPS, such problems are understood with detailed observation supported by deep thinking and problem solving  goes back to basic issues from which designs emerge to make revolutionary improvements.

Anyone undertaking the study of the Toyota production system comes face to face with SMED concept. Shingo said, "It is developed by me." SMED is now a theory and technique. It is now employed in hundreds of Japanese companies.

TPS is not entirely different from ordinary production management systems. But has unique concepts and special techniques to implement them.  It would be dangerous to take any of the techniques of TPS and implement it in a hurry. This will lead to problems. Shingo himself gave a plan to implement the techniques in a sequence.  One should not rush in to implementation of techniques. The objective is cost reduction and as long as the objective is being achieved, there is no need to rush into techniques. The importance is to be given achieve cost reduction in a continuous way and the next priority is schedule of implementing the next technique.

Updated on 23.4.2022,  5.10.2021,  22 August 2019, 1 December 2014