Showing posts with label Productivity science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Productivity science. Show all posts

Monday, October 19, 2026

Milling - Productivity Science and Productivity Industrial Engineering


Productivity Science of Machining (Turning) -F.W. Taylor -Experiments and Results.

PDF. Free Download

https://www.academia.edu/104259034/Productivity_Science_of_Machining_F_W_Taylor_Experiments_and_Results

1911

One of the earliest works done concerning the milling process involving the basic aspects of the cutting process and the efficiency of metal removal in 1911.  DeLeeuw [1911] differentiated the milling process from the metal removal process,  turning. He discussed the basic method of metal removal and the relationship of the number and spacing of teeth on the cutter to the efficiency of metal removal. DeLeeuw briefly discussed helical mills, which were new at the time, and indicated that the lower power consumption with helical mills was due to the "virtual rake" angle which was dependent on the rake angle of the tooth and the helix angle.

1916

Efficiency and Productivity Improvement of Milling Machines and Processes - A note based on
A TREATISE ON MILLING AND MILLING MACHINES
1916, BY THE CINCINNATI MILLING MACHINE COMPANY
https://   archive.org  /stream/atreatiseonmill01compgoog/atreatiseonmill01compgoog_djvu.txt


1921

On the Art of Milling 

John Airey and Carl J. Oxford 
New York :American Society of Mechanical Engineers,1921 ASME Transactions
Vol. 43, pp. 549-614

This work is titled in similar terms as The Art of Machining by F.W. Taylor and examines productivity

Taylor, in this country, and Nicolson, in England, have done classical work in the field of lathe-tool action. 

This paper describes an attempt to investigate the fundamental principles underlying the action of milling.

It is shown in the present investigation that metal is removed more efficiently with thick chips than with thin chips. It follows from this that, other conditions being equal, including speed and feed per minute, the cutter with the fewest teeth gives the greatest efficiency. However, it is evident that the efficiencies of two cutters with different numbers of teeth are equal provided the table feeds be adjusted so that the same feed per tooth is effected. This gives a definite working theory on the influence of spacing.

6 In addition to the present investigation, experiments published in substantiation of the advantage of wide spacing agree in confirming this theory. It is definitely established that for a given material, tooth shape and sharpness, thickness of chip is the sole criterion of the efficiency with which metal is removed in milling and that increase of spacing over that required for free cutting is a handicap.' Present-day high-powered cutters have several times the chip space needed. Limitation of machine power has doubtlessly been the chief factor in giving a false bias to the influence of spacing.

7 The work described in this paper started in May, 1920,  to find a rational basis for the action of a milling cutter so far as this could be removed from the region of empiricism.

9 The chip taken by a plain slab mill starts infinitely thin and its thickness gradually increases to a maximum just before the finish, from which point it quickly decreases. This decrease is practically instantaneous in an unexaggerated chip. The question arises, how does the force vary throughout the cutting of this chip?


11 The first problem is to find how the tangential force varies in relation to chip thickness. For measuring this force while the chip is being formed under reasonable commercial velocity conditions, a dynamical measuring method is the only solution, as a chip is completely cut in about one tenth of a second.

16 The analysis and computation of smoked-paper records is given fully in Appendix No. 1. An example of a chip study is given in Fig. 3', where it is very clearly shown that the force employed is not proportional to the chip thickness. In other words, material is removed more efficiently as the chip becomes thicker. This is confirmed later by experiments on varying feeds and furnishes the true explanation of the supposed advantages of coarse-tooth cutters.

17 Over twelve hundred chips were cut and the energy computed. These were taken at three different cutting speeds, viz.,   17.5, 32 and 44 ft. per min., respectively. The average of the energy required at different speeds was remarkably equal. If the energy used at lowest speed be taken as 100, the results are: Speed in ft. per min .  17.5, 32, 44 Energy . . . 100, 101.8, and 97.4  As there appears no law in this and the variation is slight, presumably  due to experimental error, the conclusion was reached that speed does not influence energy required.

 Influence of Rake and Feed on Cast Iron. The results of the analysis of  sixteen sets of chip formations in cast iron are given in Table 1 and shown graphically in Figs. 4 and 5. Each set consists of three chips formed at the different speeds as stated in Par. 17.

The area under each curve gives a numerical representation of the average production of each tool over a certain region of chip weight. Taking the 0-deg. rake tool as 100 we have: Production of 0-deg. rake tool = 100 Production of 10—deg. rake tool = 133 Production of 20-deg. rake tool = 138.4 Production of 30-deg. rake tool = 142.1



Influence of Rake and Feed on Bronze. The results of the analysis of sixteen sets of chip formations in bronze are given in the following table. As in the last section the consistent superior economy of heavy feeds is observed.

This information is condensed as before and results in: I Production of 0-deg. rake tool 100 Production of 10-deg. rake tool = 113.2 Production of 20-deg. rake tool = 123 Production of 30-deg. rake tool = 118

INFLUENCE OF RAKE AND FEED IN CUTTING MACHINE STEEL

The consistent superiority of heavy feeds is again noted. Again condensing the above information: Production of 0-deg. rake tool = 100 Production of 10-deg. rake tool = 118.7 Production of 20-deg. rake tool = 157.2 Production of 30-deg. rake tool = 172

Influence of Rake and Feed on Carbon Tool Steel. The results of the analysis of sixteen sets of chip formations in tool steel, are given in Table 3, and graphically in Figs. 8 and 9. Again condensing the above information:  Production of 0-deg. rake tool = 100,  Production of 10-deg. rake tool = 106, Production of 20-deg. rake tool = 112.2, Production of 30-deg. rake tool = 112.0.


Effect of  Lubrication. Various experiments were run with lubricant. The results must be taken qualitatively rather than quantitatively.  The action of lubrication in milling appears to be different from its action in lathe work. In lathe action, lubrication proper of the cutting tool is probably non-existent because of the unlikelihood of the lubricant finding its way to the point of the tool during cutting. The result in the lubricant being useful in lathe work only in proportion to its heat-carrying capacity and to its freedom from properties injurious to the mechanical condition of the machine.


In milling there is a decided influence entirely apart from heat-conducting properties. If the surface exposed by the last chip was very slightly smeared with an oiled finger (the oil film was scarcely discernible), the energy consumed in taking the next chip was from 10 per cent to 25 per cent lower in nearly all cases.

 On plotting batches of results, however, the surprising situation was found of oil proving advantageous with low rakes in bronze and detrimental with high rakes. The existence of some unknown varying factor was suspected and the result would have been rejected and forgotten but for the fact, that the same effect showed up in experiments with machine steel made at a different time.

The authors hesitate to accept the foregoing unreservedly until further investigation sheds some light on its rationality.

Effect of Chatter. When chatter occurs, violent fluctuation of energy results. The energy consumed was usually greater than with smooth cutting. The authors believe that, due to chatter alone increase of energy invariably results and that, where a decrease?   This can be brought about by the chatter causing an increase of force normal to the work and this in turn springing the work or cutter.

29 Effect of Clearance. Clearance was found not to affect energy consumed. Chatter, wear of tool and liability of tool to snip are affected by clearance.

30 Method of Determining Machineability. The word “machineability” is suggested to indicate the ease with which a given material can be machined. This of course presupposes standardized conditions of tool and size and shape of chip. If all conditions be standardized except the quality of the material being cut, then the machineability can be expressed in foot-pounds of energy required to remove one cubic inch of the material under investigation.

31 It is well known that machineability is a continual bone of contention in machining departments and that no accepted satisfactory way has yet been devised for its measurement. It is generally admitted that even though chemical analysis, tensile strength, elongation, Brinell hardness number and scleroscope hardness number are known, yet the machineability is an unknown factor. In fact, the War Department gave to the American Research Council as their major topic the development of some definite means of determining machineability. 



33 To summarize: The authors had, at this state of development, no definite idea leading to a rational structure which would connect up the results. They regard the work in this section as useful in opening up territory, thereby enabling them to formulate more definite layouts for subsequent work, and believe that broadly the following conclusions are justified:

(a) As a chip thickens, metal is removed more easily per unit volume
(b) As rake angle is increased, metal is removed more easily per unit volume. Also this improvement is continuous but not uniform
(c) The advantage of rake depends on the material and is more pronounced with ductile materials
(d) The effect of lubrication proper (apart from cooling action) is decided, but the information available is inadequate to formulate it.

34 Numerous experiments on power consumption have been made by different investigators, but the method employed has been to measure the electrical input required to drive the machine. This confuses the unknown action of the cutter with the unknown machine loss and has therefore been rejected for the present investigation.
35 Features to be Measured: It was thought desirable to measure both the vertical and the horizontal components of the force exerted by the cutter. This necessitated developing an instrument that would measure both force and location, i.e., in all, three quantities: magnitude, direction and location. Or, which amounts to the same thing, the two components and the location may be measured.

39 Influence of Rake on Machine‘ Steel. The results of fourteen experiments are shown in Table 4 and graphically in Fig. 12. The noticeable consistency in the spacing of the pairs of values given as results of the zero-rake cutter is due to the second three having been taken in a different part of the block from the first three. The results plotted in Fig. 12 show the decided advantage of rake. The advantage of heavy chips is also clearly shown except in the case of the 20-deg. tool.

It is important to note that Carl Barth and Gilbreth made comments on this paper.

Gilbreth said his methods could be used to photograph the cutting action of the milling machine.

1923

Two Interesting Papers in ASME Transactions of 1923, Vol. 45

EFFECT OF VARIATIONS DESIGN OF MILLING CUTTERS ON POWER REQUIREMENTS AND CAPACITY
By Bensamin P. Graves,and James A. Provipence, R.
Pp. 165- 192

POWER REQUIRED FOR CUTTING METAL
By Fred A. Parsons
Pp. 193 -

Prof N.N. Sawin's Paper - A brief review

Boston and Kraus presented their work regarding milling in two parts in 1932. They evaluated the effects of cutter width, variations in feed and depth of cut, tool dulling and cutting fluids on milling energy, surface finish and tool life. They discussed the surface finish obtained by both the up and down milling processes.  It was determined that the shinier surface produced by up milling was probably due to a burnishing action of the cutter at the start of each cut. They observed that although not as shiny, the surface produced by down milling was flatter and freer from ridges, but that the surface often had a dull torn appearance. An investigation of cutter dulling was made and it was determined that the energy required to power the cutter increased rapidly and uniformly as the cutter became dull.

In their second part, Boston and Kraus further discussed the difference between up and down milling and their respective finishes. The adherence of chips to the cutting edge in relation to the surface finish obtained was discussed. They were the first investigators to present work done regarding the presence of a built-up edge.

Boston, 0. W. and Kraus, Charles E., "The Elements of Milling," Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 54, 1932, p. RP-71.


Boston, 0. W. and Kraus, Charles E., "The Elements of Milling, Part 2," Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 56, 1934, pp. 355-371.




Productivity analysis of machining milled surfaces
November 2018, IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering 448(1):012012

Machining time calculators
https://www.kennametal.com/in/en/resources/engineering-calculators.html

INVESTIGATION ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF MILLING TI6AL4V WITH CRYOGENIC MINIMUM QUANTITY LUBRICATION
Modern Machinery (MM) Science Journal, November 2019
DOI : 10.17973/MMSJ.2019_11_2019098
D. GROSS1
M. APPIS1
N. HANENKAMP1
1Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Institute of Resource and Energy Efficient Production Systems, Furth, DE
https://www.mmscience.eu/journal/issues/november-2019/articles/investigation-on-the-productivity-of-milling-ti6al4v-with-cryogenic-minimum-quantity-lubrication

Productivity Considerations in Face Milling
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.952.66
Online since:April 2019
Authors: János Kundrák,  Viktor Molnár*, István Deszpoth, Tamás Makkai
Keywords: Face Milling, Material Removal Rate, Precision Machining


6/1/2002
Milling Advances Increase Productivity
Keeping on top of new advances in cutting tools can keep moldmakers profitable.
https://www.moldmakingtechnology.com/articles/milling-advances-increase-productivity

2014






2016

Milling productivity and tool wear. We can select milling parameters to maximize the productivity.

This paper presents experimental results for flank wear width, cutting force, temperature, and surface finish with increasing tool wear in titanium (Ti6Al4V) milling. The variation in these process indicators is reported for repeated trials as the wear progresses from a new tool condition to a significantly worn state. 

Based on the measured force data, cutting force coefficients are determined as the tool wears. These coefficients are combined with the structural dynamics to predict the process stability. The achievable chatter-free material removal rate is then computed for both the new and worn tool conditions. In this way, the variation in productivity is related to the wear state. As expected, the productivity reduces with increase wear.


2018
2018
Productivity analysis of machining milled surfaces
November 2018, IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering 




2021
Published 6/3/2021
CMS debuts hybrid LFAM/milling machine
The machining specialist has developed the first iteration of Kreator, a large-format, thermoplastic composite 3D printer and five-axis milling machine for tooling and jigs.

2023
Using GANs to predict milling stability from limited data

Shahrbanoo Rezaei1 · Aaron Cornelius2 · Jaydeep Karandikar3 · Tony Schmitz2,3 · Anahita Khojandi1
Received: 24 April 2023 / Accepted: 25 November 2023
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-023-02291-1
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024


2024

2.1.2024
For its patented M409 tangential milling system, tooling manufacturer Horn has introduced new rhombic indexable inserts with polished rake faces to enable efficient machining of non-ferrous metals in the ISO N material group, principally aluminium alloys.

High quality is achieved on the surface of machined components, despite the ductility and adhesive nature of the workpiece material, which tends to cause built-up edges as well as cracking and wear of the cutting edge.

Unveiling the Future: High-performance Milling Cutter Market Size and Outlook 2031
International Business Insight
January 2, 2024

CUTTING TOOL FOR MILLING THREADS
The Walter Thrill∙tec TC645 Supreme is a 3-in-1 solution for thread milling.


2026

Review on the Productivity and Production Quality of WC-Co and Ceramic Tools Applied in Milling Operations of Inconel 718

Vitor F. C. Sousa, Tiago E. F. Silva, Wenfeng Ding, and Abílio M. P. de Jesus
Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Manufacturing (JMEM) Articles - 2602003029,  Open Access Review.
Published: 22 Apr 2026


Interesting this article was started on 1.1.2024. This topic is not at all known in industrial engineering community. It has to be developed and made popular.





Ud. 18.1.2026, 18.1.2024,  2.1.2024
Pub 1.1.2024















Sunday, October 18, 2026

Productivity Science of Machining - Taylor to Current Times






“Productivity science is scientific effort, that in any specific work situation, identifies the appropriate philosophy, culture, systems, processes, technology, methods and human physical action and behavior and elements of each of them of that will maximize positive (social, environmental and economic) outcomes relative to the resources consumed.” - Narayana Rao (IISE 2020 Annual Conference Proceedings)

Productivity Science - Principle of Industrial Engineering
Lesson 8 of  Industrial Engineering ONLINE Course   - Introduction to Industrial Engineering Module

Taylor - Productivity Science and Art of Metal Cutting - Important Points
Lesson 14 of  Industrial Engineering ONLINE Course - IE Concepts Module - Contribution of Taylor, Gilbreth, Emerson, Maynard, Barnes, Shigeo Shingo.

45

IE Research by Taylor Part 1 - Productivity of Machining


46

Part 2 - IE Research by Taylor - Productivity of Machining


47

Part 3 - IE Research by Taylor - Productivity of Machining.


48

Part 4 - IE Research by Taylor - Productivity of Machining
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2020/07/part-4-ie-research-by-taylor.html


49

Part 5 - IE Research by Taylor - Productivity of Machining
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2020/07/part-5-ie-research-by-taylor.html


50

Metal Cutting Processes - Industrial Engineering and Productivity Aspects
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2020/07/metal-cutting-processes-industrial.html


51

Machine Tools - Industrial Engineering and Productivity Aspects

52

Machining Cutting Tools - Industrial Engineering and Productivity Aspects

53

Machine Tool Toolholders - Industrial Engineering and Productivity Aspects

54

Metal Cutting Temperatures - Industrial Engineering and Productivity Aspects

55

Machining Process Simulation - Industrial Engineering and Productivity Analysis

56

Cutting Tool Wear and Tool Life Analysis - Industrial Engineering and Productivity Aspects

57

Surface Finish - Industrial Engineering and Productivity Aspects

58

Work Material - Machinability - Industrial Engineering and Productivity Aspects

59

Machine Rigidity - Industrial Engineering and Productivity Aspects

60

Machining Time Reduction - Machining Cost Reduction - Industrial Engineering of Machining Operations

61

Machine Tool Cutting Fluids - Industrial Engineering and Productivity Aspects


62

High Speed Machining - Industrial Engineering and Productivity Aspects

63

Design for Machining - Industrial Engineering and Productivity Aspects



Productivity Science of Drilling

Milling - Productivity Science and Engineering



Productivity and Productivity Science - Definitions

Productivity Science Module - Lessons



Grinding - Productivity Science and Productivity Engineering - Opportunities for 2020 and Beyond

Productivity Science and Engineering of Machining - Further Developments After F.W. Taylor
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2024/07/productivity-science-and-engineering-of.html


The Science and Art of Machine and Operator Productivity in Industry 4.0.
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2023/04/the-science-and-art-of-machine-and.html

Productivity Science - Foundation - Pillar of Industrial Engineering - A Collection of Research Papers
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2024/02/productivity-science-foundation-pillar.html




Productivity Science of Machining - Taylor - PDF File - Download Information
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2023/07/productivity-science-of-machining.html

Productivity Science of Machining - 2016 Update - Stephenson - Agapiou
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2020/04/productivity-science-of-machining.html

IE Research - Machining of Titanium Alloy Analysis of Productivity and Machining Efficiency
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2022/07/ie-research-machining-of-titanium-alloy.html


Productivity Science - Determinants of Productivity
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2017/10/productivity-science-determinants-of.html


Depth of Cut in Grinding - Research and Guidelines - Bibliography
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2020/03/depth-of-cut-in-grinding-research-and.html

Machining Science - Machining Productivity Science
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2020/07/machining-science-machining.html


Grinding Science and Parameters
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2020/02/grinding-science-and-parameters.html


Productivity Science of Machines and Machine Operations and Elements - Bibliography

https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2019/12/productivity-science-of-machines-and.html

Productivity Science of Machine - Machining - F.W. Taylor
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2019/09/productivity-science-of-machine.html

Information for Industrial Engineering


News - Information for Inspection Operation Analysis
News - Information for Material Handling and Transport Operation Analysis
News - Information for Analysis of Delays in Processes

News - Information for Storage/Warehousing Operation Analysis
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2020/07/news-information-for-storagewarehousing.html
News - Information for Information Generation & Transmission - Operation Analysis
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2020/07/news-information-for-information.html
News - Information for Maintenance Operation Analysis
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2020/07/news-information-for-maintenance.html


Productivity Engineering of Machining Operations - Machining Operation Inspection Sheet 


Productivity Science of Machining -F.W. Taylor -Experiments and Results.
A summary of productivity science in the book "The Art of Metal Cutting" published in 1907.



Productivity Science and Engineering of Machining - Further Developments After F.W. Taylor
1954 - TLUSTY PUBLISHES CHATTER THEORY - Dr. Jiri Tlusty of VUOSO-Prague develops Theory of Self-Excited Vibrations.





Ud. 18.10.2026, 20.7.2025, 27.7.2024
Pub. 16.9.2020









Thursday, May 14, 2026

Practice Areas of Industrial Engineering - Productivity Science - Determinants of Productivity

Included in

Philosophy, Principles and Practices of Industrial Engineering - Modern Industrial Engineering May 2026 Issue

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/philosophy-principles-practices-industrial-engineering-kvss-tedgf/



Practice Areas of Industrial Engineering



Productivity Science - Determinants of Productivity

https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2017/10/productivity-science-determinants-of.html

Productivity Science of Machine Effort

Productivity Science of Human  Effort


Frameworks for Productivity Science of Machine Effort and Human Effort

Rao, Kambhampati Venkata Satya Surya Narayana.IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings; Norcross (2020): 429-434.

https://www.proquest.com/openview/5786c4e6edff56abf808b4db26f083b3/1.pdf

Productivity Science of Material


Productivity Science of Energy

Productivity Science of  Information

Productivity Science of Production Processes

 - In Industrial engineering, a process is a sequence of operations (steps) that produce a part or subassembly or final assembly.

 - In production different ways of manufacturing are termed as processes. Turning process, Milling process etc.

Productivity Science of Production Operations

Productivity Science of Inspection Processes

Productivity Science of Inspection Operations

Productivity Science of Material Handling Processes

Productivity Science of Material Handling Operations

Productivity Science of  Storage Processes

Productivity Science of Storage Operationa

Productivity Science of Production Quantity Planning

Productivity Science of Production Plan Control

Productivity Science of Plant Layout or Facility Layout


Tuesday, February 3, 2026

Concept Paper - MSME Cluster Finance Bank Branches for Productivity and Sustainability Improvement

 


Background Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) are the backbone of India’s industrial economy, contributing over 30% to the national GDP, 45% of manufacturing output, and nearly 50% of India’s total exports. The sector also provides employment for over 11 crore people, making it the second-largest source of jobs after agriculture. In line with the Hon’ble Prime Minister’s vision of Atma nirbhar Bharat, strengthening MSMEs through innovation, technology adoption, digital transformation, and collaborative growth models has become a national priority. The Cluster Approach in MSMEs refers to the sharing of common infrastructure, services, and knowledge by enterprises operating in related sectors in a geographical area. This approach has emerged globally as a proven strategy to boost productivity and competitiveness in the manufacturing sector. India today has more than 7,000 industrial clusters, including traditional, sectoral, and geographic clusters, contributing a major share to regional manufacturing output. Despite their strategic importance, MSMEs face multiple challenges — including limited access to advanced technologies, skilled manpower, modern manufacturing 1 systems, finance, and common infrastructure. For instance, the sector continues to struggle with a large credit shortfall: estimates put the MSME credit-gap at around ₹30 lakh crore, or roughly 24% of total credit demand. Meanwhile, only a small fraction of enterprises is able to access formal credit — for many, financing remains inaccessible or too costly. 

The Hindu Business Line. (2025, May 13). MSME sector faces ₹30-lakh crore credit gap; alternative finance gathers pace. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/money-and-banking/msme-sectorfaces-30-lakh-crore-credit-gap-alternative-finance-gathers-pa... 5



SIDBI Cluster Initiatives

https://www.sidbi.in/en/msme-cluster-development-initiatives





https://www.linkedin.com/posts/icicidirect_industry-investment-finance-activity-7413810244000292864-OQK8/





Sunday, December 28, 2025

Productivity Science - Principle of Industrial Engineering



Productivity Science -  Principle of Industrial Engineering in TAYLOR - NARAYANA RAO PRINCIPLES OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING


Develop a science for each element of a man - machine system's work related to efficiency and productivity.


The productivity science developed is the foundation for industrial engineering in productivity engineering and productivity management phases.

F.W. Taylor made the initial experiments to develop productivity science of machines as well as for men. The experiments done by Taylor in the case of machines, tools and cutting parameters were many over a period of 30 years. Similarly, Gilbreth proposed and wrote on the development of science for human effort and he published number of papers in the area of productivity science of human effort. Ralph Barnes did his Phd work in the area of productivity science of human effort.




1-Productivity Science


Productivity Science Definition


“Productivity science is scientific effort, that in any specific work situation, identifies the appropriate philosophy, culture, systems, processes, technology, methods and human physical action and behavior and elements of each of them of that will maximize positive (social, environmental and economic) outcomes relative to the resources consumed.” - Narayana Rao (IISE 2020 Annual Conference Proceedings)


Productivity science of machine identifies machine related variables that will increase productivity. These variable will be different for different categories of machines even though some variables are more general and apply to all machines or many categories of machines.


Machining or Machine Tool Productivity Science


Variables that have an effect on productivity of machining operations.

1. Selection of the machining process. Right selection of the machining process is important. There can be choice between turning and grinding.
2. Selection of machine tool.
3. Selection of cutting tool.
4. Selection of tool holder. Modular systems, quick change systems etc.
5. Calculation and measurement of cutting forces and their planning using various alternatives.
6. Measurement and planning of temperature in the cutting zone.
7. Selection of fixture. Measurement and planning of clamping forces in fixtures.
8. Tool wear estimation and selection of appropriate tool life.
9. Process planning to attain surface finish required.
10. Understanding the machinability characteristics of the material.
11. Analysis and planning of rigidity and vibrations of the machine.
12. Selection of cutting fluid. Now even dry machining is advocated.
13. Utilizing high speed machines and high throughput machining processes.
14. Utilizing design for machining in the part as well as in planning various cuts.
15. Economic analysis and optimization of machining process

Productivity Science of Machine - Machining - F.W. Taylor
Taylor is the pioneer in doing productivity studies on machine tools.
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2019/09/productivity-science-of-machine.html

Lesson 14. Taylor - Productivity Science of Metal Cutting - Important Points

Productivity Science of Human Effort 


Frank B. Gilbreth - VARIABLES THAT AFFECT MOTION ECONOMY

Every element that makes up or affects the amount of work that the worker is able to turn out has to be identified and adjusted appropriately to increase productivity. The variables related to human effort productivity  group themselves naturally into the following divisions as per the thinking of Gilbreth:

I. Variables of the Worker.


1 . Anatomy.

2. Brawn.

3. Contentment.

4. Creed.

5. Earning Power.

6. Experience.

7. Fatigue.

8. Habits.

9. Health.

10. Mode of living.

11 . Nutrition.

12. Size.

13. Skill.

14. Temperament.

15. Training.

II. Variables of the Surroundings, Equipment, and Tools.


1. Appliances.

2. Clothes.

3. Colors.

4. Entertainment, music, reading, etc.

5. Heating, Cooling, Ventilating.

6. Lighting.

7. Quality of material.

8. Reward and punishment.

9. Size of unit moved.

10. Special fatigue-eliminating devices.

11. Surroundings.

12. Tools.

13. Union rules.

14. Weight of unit moved.

III. Variables of the Specific Motion.


1. Acceleration.

2. Automaticity.

3. Combination with other motions and sequence.

4. Cost.

5. Direction.

6. Effectiveness.

7. Foot-pounds of work accomplished.

8. Inertia and momentum overcome.

9. Length.

10. Necessity,

11. Path.

12. "Play for position."

13. Speed.


Productivity Science of Human Effort - More Detail - F.W. Gilbreth's Motion Study
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2019/09/productivity-science-of-human-effort-fw.html

Productivity Science - Determinants of Productivity

Frameworks of Productivity Science of Machine Effort and Human Effort by Narayana Rao - Paper is presented in the IISE 2020 Annual Conference and is part of the proceedings.

Frameworks for Productivity Science of Machine Effort and Human Effort
Rao, Kambhampati Venkata Satya Surya Narayana. 
IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings; Norcross (2020): 429-434.


https://wcps.info/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Productivity_Science-A_Global_Movement.pdf

____________________


Principles of Industrial Engineering - Narayana Rao - Presentation at 2017 IISE Annual Conference - Pittsburgh, USA

23 May 2017

____________________


____________________


"Embrace Scientific Thinking" is a guiding principle of Shingo Model.

Innovation and improvement are the consequence of repeated cycles of experimentation, direct observation and learning. A relentless and systematic exploration of new ideas, including failures, enables us to constantly refine our understanding of reality.


“Embrace Scientific Thinking” – A Universal and Timeless Principle
By: Robert Miller.

Principles of Industrial Engineering - Narayana Rao - Detailed List

Clicking on the link will take you to more detailed content on the principle





Published version is available in the Proceedings - 2017 Industrial and Systems Engineering Conference of INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERS.

Kambhampati,Venkata Satya Surya Narayana Rao. (2017). Principles of industrial engineering. IIE Annual Conference.Proceedings, , 890-895. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1951119980

30 Factors that Affect Productivity


Given by Prof Paul Mali in the year 1978 in Improving Total Productivity, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Fourth Level Factors (Affect most directly): Effectiveness (Focus on customer requirements), Efficiency (Focus on planned resource consumption)

Third Level Factors:  Skills, Motivation, Methods, Cost (measurement, may include time and productivity measurements also).

Second Level Factors: Leadership, Experience, Climate, Incentives, Schedules, Organizational structure, Technology and Materials.

First Level Factors (Affect least directly): Abilities, Style, Training, Knowledge, Physical conditions, Unions, Social awareness, Aspiration levels, Processes, Job design, Goals, Policies, R & D, Plant and Equipment, Standards, and Quality.

Principles of Productivity Growth


Given by Prof Paul Mali in the year 1978 in Improving Total Productivity, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

1. Principles of Ratio Time Measurement


Productivity is more likely to improve when expected results are measured and made greater in the same time frame that expected resources are measured and made less.

2. Principles of Shared Gain

Productivity increases rapidly when its expected benefits are shared with those who will produce it.

3. Principle of Expectancy Alignment

The greater the alignment of employee expectancies (needs) with organizational objectives (targets), the greater the motivation to accomplish both.

4. Principle of Worker Accountability

Accountability for productivity is more likely to happen when employees understand, participate in, and are held responsible for productivity objectives, measurement, and evaluation.

5. Principles of Focus

The greater the focus toward productivity objectives on a time scale, the greater the likelihood of achieving these objectives.

6. Principle of Creating Potential Productivity

Productivity gains are more likely to be achieved from situations where the potential for productivity gain is created.

7. Principle of Continuance

Productivity tends to continue when achieving an objective does not incapacitate or destroy any of the factors which produced it.

8. Principle of  Work Justice

Productivity is more likely to continue when employees are given equal pay for equal work; when employers are given equal work for equal pay.

9. Principle of  Elasticity

Productivity tends to increase when the same amount of work is achieved in a shorter period of time.

10. Principle of  Resource Priority

Productivity increases when objectives for productivity set the priorities for resource allocation.

Articles with Collection of Various Factors - Determinants of Productivity

Productivity Science - Determinants of Productivity

http://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2017/10/productivity-science-determinants-of.html


Readings on the topic of Productivity Science

Adam Smith

From Taylor's First Paper Publication to 1950


Development of Science for Working of Machines

Scientific Management in Machine Shop

Development of Science for Working of Man - Motions

Development of Science in Mechanic Arts

H.M. Wilcox
The definition of the word science is knowledge duly arranged and systematized.
The present state of the art of industrial management : majority and minority report of sub-committee on administration ; including discussion (page 1164)
Author American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Subcommittee on Administration.
1912
http://stevens.cdmhost.com/cdm/ref/collection/p4100coll1/id/2423

Oxford Dictionary - Organized body of knowledge that has been accumulated on a subject

Modern Period - 1951 onwards


A GENERAL SYSTEMS THEORY OF PRODUCTIVITY
RICHARD O. MASON
Journal International Journal of General Systems
Volume 5, 1979 - Issue 1
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03081077908960885


Productivity in the Services Sector
Barry P. Bosworth and Jack E. Triplett, January 1, 2000
https://www.brookings.edu/research/productivity-in-the-services-sector/

Productivity in Public and Nonprofit Organizations
Margo Berman
Routledge, 18-Dec-2014 - First published 2006, Business & Economics - 240 pages
https://books.google.co.in/books?id=2kPfBQAAQBAJ

‘Smarter, Faster, Better’: The New Science of Productivity
2 June 2016
http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/the-new-science-of-productivity/


The Science of Economic Development and Growth: The Theory of Factor Proportions: The Theory of Factor Proportions
C.C. Onyemelukwe
Routledge, 08-Jul-2016 - Business & Economics - 384 pages
https://books.google.co.in/books?id=6mulDAAAQBAJ

The New Science of Sales Force Productivity
Dianne Ledingham, Mark Kovac, Heidi Locke Simon
Harvard Business Review, THE SEPTEMBER 2006 ISSUE


David Sumanth on Productivity Science
David Sumanth in his Book, Total Productivity Management in page 252 says that quality science, productivity science and manufacturing science are often considered part of industrial engineering and management science, although they have emerged as separate areas since the late 1970s.

It is important to note that productivity science is an important component of industrial engineers right from inception. Productivity science is yet to become a popular subject and theme even in industrial engineering or for that matter scientific management. So making claim that is has emerged as a separate area is debatable. Quality is treated as a constraint in industrial engineering and value engineering. Quality improvement progressed a lot under the leadership Crosby, Juran, Deming. Manufacturing science is the science behind production engineering or manufacturing engineering. Industrial engineers also use manufacturing science to develop industrial engineering solutions in the manufacturing field.
https://books.google.co.in/books?id=mLAv09ocvTsC&pg=PA252#v=onepage&q&f=false


The International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management aims to address new developments in productivity science, performance measurement and management and to improve individual, group and organizational performance.
IJPPM is the official journal of the World Confederation of Productivity Science
http://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=ijppm



A.N. Saxena
Productivity Science: A Global Movement
HISTORY OF THE WORLD CONFEDERATION OF PRODUCTIVITY SCIENCE (WCPS)
THE WORLD ACADEMY OF PRODUCTIVITY SCIENCE (WAPS)


We call productivity a science because we are striving for universal laws in productivity matters. It has emerged as a systematized knowledge; is concerned with universal socio-economic issues which are vital for humanity. And, it is our vision to capture and disseminate how productivity science knowledge creates societal values and thereby enhances productivity. We believe that it is the unknown future which helps humans with more productive Ideas.

Despite this simple definition when it comes to its applied aspects, productivity science is confronted with vexed issues which certainly deserve clarification.

Science means getting at facts and trying to understand them. What the scientific approach does is to give a specific and detailed line of endeavour which has a probability of bringing about the desired result. Science helps to uncover the truth, discover what things are and reveal how to regulate them. 

A.N. Saxena
Productivity Science: A Global Movement
HISTORY OF THE WORLD CONFEDERATION OF PRODUCTIVITY SCIENCE (WCPS)
THE WORLD ACADEMY OF PRODUCTIVITY SCIENCE (WAPS)


28.12.2025, 17.12.2023
Updated 2021 - 8 June 2021,  9 January 2021,   25 May 2020 , 21 September 2019
29 June 2017