Tuesday, April 24, 2018

Productivity Awards - Information Bulletin Board



2012

Rajasthan State Productivity Excellence Award

Mayur Uniquoters Limited
http://www.mayuruniquoters.com/awards-achievements.php

TCIL secured first position under 'Significant' category in CII Eastern Region Productivity Awards 2011-2012.
http://www.tatatinplate.com/CII-prod-Award-mar-12.shtm

2011

Modern’s annual Productivity Achievement Awards
By MMH Staff · February 1, 2011
Modern’s annual Productivity Achievement Awards honor companies that have made outstanding strides in improving operations through materials handling and related information systems.

Companies were judged for their ability to deliver top-level customer service, respond rapidly to changing conditions, deliver orders that meet customer requirements, and improve operations.

2011 Winners
Warehousing/Distribution: Office Depot

Manufacturing: Rubbermaid Commercial Products
https://www.mmh.com/article/moderns_2011_productivity_achievement_awards


VOLVO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT RECEIVES NATIONAL PRODUCTIVITY AWARD IN KOREA
9/7/2011
https://www.volvoce.com/global/en/news-and-events/news-and-press-releases/2011/vce-receives-national-productivity-award-in-korea/

Monday, April 23, 2018

Organizational Trends Affecting Productivity - Paul Mali - Summary



For higher productivity, too many complex factors must be arranged, coordinated, and managed. Reliable productivity requires an awareness of its basic components, an understanding of its processes, and a well thought out strategy.  Management personnel must have the skills and competence for managing productivity.



Twelve Causes of the Productivity Crisis in Organizations (1978)

1. Shocking wastes of resources result form our inability to measure, evaluate, and manage the productivity of a growing white-collar work force.

2. Spiraling inflation results from giving rewards and benefits without requiring the equivalent in productivity and accountability.

3. Delays and time lags result from diffused authority and inefficiency in complex, superorganizations.

4. Costs sour from organizational expansion that reduces growth.

5. Low motivation prevails among a rising number of affluent workers and new attitudes.

6. Late deliveries are caused by schedules that have been disrupted by scarce materials.

7. Unresolved human conflicts and difficulties in cooperation result in organizational ineffectiveness.

8. Management options and prerogatives for productivity are constrained by increasing legislative intrusions and antiquates laws.

9. Dissatisfying and boring work has resulted from specialized and restrictive work processes.

10, New opportunities and innovations are declining from impact of rapid technological change and high costs.

11. Time commitments are disrupted from the increasing demands of leisure time.

12. Practitioners become obsolete because of their inability to keep pace with accelerating information and knowledge.

Saturday, April 21, 2018

Productivity Management - Management Function-Wise Explanation





Productivity Management - Traditional Management Function-wise Explanation



Planning for Productivity 


The top management is to set productivity objectives and goals that are in line with and integrated into organisation’s long-term strategic plans. To ensure that these goals are met, key performance indicators and targets need to be identified and developed. The organisation’s productivity performance can be monitored against these targets.

Phase I – Diagnose

For any productivity intervention to be effective, management should have a thorough understanding of the organisation’s current situation. This can be done through a productivity diagnosis.

A productivity diagnosis covers a qualitative assessment of organisation’s performance in relation to the productivity levers and a quantitative assessment of organisation’s performance based on certain key indicators that are linked to the various productivity levers.

These assessments are undertaken specifically to:
Measure the gap between the current situation and the productivity goals set by the organisation in the past.
Identify organisation’s strengths and weaknesses in the area of productivity improvement.
Determine the underlying causes of the gaps (for the weak areas).
Determine areas for improvement.

Qualitative Assessment of Performance


The key levers that affect productivity can be identified.

Technology - Adoption on appropriate technology on a continuing basis

Machinery & Equipment - Selection of appropriate machinery and equipment and their replacement based on engineering economic analysis

Operators - Human effort engineering - Design manual activities incorporating motion studies, principles of motion economy and ergonomics


Productivity Levers


Reduction of Price and Reduction of External Failure of Products - Stimulate Demand providing market for increased productivity and economies of scale.

Productivity Innovations - Technology, Management - Processes, Policies, Programs, Rules, Human Effort

Productivity Standards Improvement

Productivity Control Effort

Productivity Knowledge Base Improvement

Increasing Skills of Operators and Managers - Productivity Training

Changing Attitudes of Operators and Managers





These  levers are areas or actions that an  organisation can focus on to improve productivity significantly.

Productivity levers do not operate in silos. Improvements made to one lever require complementary actions on some other levers, for it to be effective. For example, the adoption of new technology inevitably requires the complementary actions of training of employees and redesign of work processes. Similarly, weakness in one lever is likely to have an adverse effect on other levers.

Quantitative Assessment of Performance


There are 10 common indicators used to gauge an organisation’s productivity performance:

 Labour productivity
 Sales per employee
 Value added-to-sales ratio
 Capital productivity
 Sales per dollar of capital
 Capital intensity
 Labour cost competitiveness
 Labour cost per employee
 Profit-to-value added ratio
 Profit margin

Along with an analysis of organisation’s overall performance, the performance of the operational units and functions also needs to be measured.

To know how well an  organisation is faring in the area productivity,  a comparison the organisation’s performance against some standard has to be made. This can be done across time and space, with external entities (e.g. benchmarks and organisations within the same industry) and within the organisation (e.g. between departments for setting departmental goals) . Such comparisons provide valuable information on the organisation’s relative standing vis-à-vis competitors and the best-in-class performers.

Organisations who want to assess themselves against their competitors can use the Inter-firm Comparison (IFC) tool. Some industry organizations conduct IFC studies involve comparing productivity ratios of organisations in the same industry. Their identities are kept confidential and summary results are circulated or sold as reports to the members of the industry organization.


Phase II

Develop Road Map


After the diagnosis is completed, a productivity road map or action plan has to be developed. The road map indicates specific activities to achieve productivity goals in a coordinated and systematic manner.

Components of Productivity Road Map

A productivity road map addresses the following:

What affects productivity?
 Identify the specific actions that need to be taken in relation to the findings from the diagnosis.
 Spell out the key performance indicators, targets and deliverables for the actions to be taken.

Who affects productivity?
 Identify the units or individuals who will carry out the actions.
 Assign responsibilities and accountabilities to the parties identified.

When are the activities to be undertaken?
 Set milestones and timelines for the actions to be taken.
The actions should then be taken and monitored according to the road map.

Organizing for Productivity


Establish Productivity Management Function

Establish A Productivity Management Structure

Good management of productivity requires commitment and focus from top management. A dedicated organisational structure must be set up to facilitate the productivity improvement effort. Depending on organisation’s policy decision, needs, size and characteristics, this structure may take the form of:
 a productivity management unit, headed by a Productivity Manager who reports directly  to senior management; or
 a cross-functional team comprising productivity coordinators appointed from the various  operational units.

In engineering organizations, the best practice is to establish industrial engineering department to take care of productivity management because engineering products and processes have to be improved to improve productivity.

The typical scope of work of a Productivity Manager is given under a separate topic. The scope relevant to a particular organisation can defined depending on the structure and complexity of the productivity management function in an organisation.

Staffing Productivity Department


Productivity department requires productivity coaches and study experts. The norms for productivity department personnel may have to be established. Let us say each engineering and production manager requires one industrial engineer to support him in engineering organizations.

Other Resources for Productivity Department
Productivity department may need a laboratory of its own or  a work area where they can try out alternative ways of doing work.

Directing Productivity Effort


Garner Participation and Commitment

A harmonious and open corporate culture is essential to continuous productivity improvement. This can be achieved through the following:

Commitment from Top Management
Top management sets the direction of an organisation. For any productivity plan to succeed, senior leadership must be fully committed to the cause. This commitment can be expressed through direct communication with employees on your productivity goals and strategies, as well as allocation of resources for productivity improvement. A senior employee could also be put in charge of the organisation’s productivity efforts.

Communication and Creation of Awareness
Employees must have a clear understanding of productivity concepts, the organisation’s productivity goals and how these goals will benefit them as well as the organisation. They then need to be armed with the right tools to improve their productivity and know how they can play a part in the productivity journey.

It is, therefore, important to set up open communication channels between departments, staff and management to facilitate exchange of ideas and information, create trust and engage employees.

Mobilisation of Employees
Employees should be involved in each stage of the productivity effort — from the setting of targets and development of initiatives, to the measurement and management of productivity performance. Their involvement helps to foster commitment and provides them with a sense of ownership.


Control of Productivity Improvement 


Implement Measurement System

Importance of Productivity Measures
Productivity improvement initiatives must be complemented by a sound measurement system, which forms an integral part of an organisation’s management information system.

Productivity measures can be used to:
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of action plans
  • Monitor performance
  • Set targets and formulate strategies
  • Account to various stakeholders – customers, investors, employees, suppliers and funding agencies
  • Link effort and reward for employees


Productivity Measurement

Since productivity is the relationship between output and the input used to produce that output, there are various ratios you can use to measure the performance of different operational units within your organisation. By adopting an integrated approach to productivity measurement, you can learn how each of your departments affects your organisation’s overall performance.

Key management indicators at the top are broad indicators that provide management with information related to productivity and profitability. They are then broken down into activity indicators and operational indicators.

Activity indicators provide a snapshot of costs, activity levels and resource utilisation rates, which are particularly useful for middle and higher management.

Operational indicators are usually physical ratios that address the operational aspects that need to be monitored and controlled.

You should consider the following points in selecting productivity ratios:

  • Ratios should measure something significant.
  • Only elements that have an important impact on the business performance should be measured.
  • Ratios should be meaningful and action-oriented.
  • Ratios used must be relevant to the objectives and operations of your organisation.
  • They should explain the pattern of performance and preferably signal a course of action.
  • Component parts of the ratios should be reasonably related.
  • The numerator and the denominator should correspond with each other. For example, it would not be appropriate to relate sales with the number of employees in the human resources department as they are not directly responsible for sales.


Implement Performance Management System


Productivity measurement tells an organisation how it is performing and why, and what it should do in view of its performance. The next step is to use these measures to manage productivity performance.

Performance management covers two main areas: (a) activities to monitor performance; and (b) activities to reinforce performance and motivate employees.

Activities to Monitor Performance

Productivity Level and Growth

An organisation’s productivity performance can be monitored in terms of the productivity level measured by the various productivity ratios, or the change in productivity level over time. Productivity level represents the efficiency and effectiveness of resource utilization achieved at a given point in time. Comparison of productivity levels must be made between similar entities. For example, the management of a restaurant chain may compare the labor productivity of outlet A against that of outlet B.

The change in productivity level over time is expressed as a percentage. It indicates dynamism and the potential for achieving higher productivity levels. An organisation with a consistently high productivity growth rate may overtake another with a negative growth rate, even if its current productivity level is lower.

Comparison of Performance

Within the organisation, comparisons can be made against its productivity goals and targets to evaluate the effectiveness of the productivity efforts; and against its past performance for trend analysis. Comparisons can also be made across different operational units and different employees for performance appraisals.

Review and Feedback Mechanism
Information on any organisation’s productivity performance is rendered useless if it does not lead to further improvements. It is therefore important to put in place a review and feedback mechanism to gather valuable information for strategic planning and training purposes. The information should be made readily available to all employees to improve the performance of the organisation or the unit that they are in.

Activities to Reinforce Performance and Motivate Employees
To sustain the productivity drive, a clear link between rewards and achievements must be established. The wealth generated by the organisation should be distributed back to those who have contributed to the production process.

Productivity incentive schemes can take different forms:
1. Recognition Schemes
Awards can be given out to individuals or teams to encourage continuous productivity improvements.
2. Productivity Gain-Sharing Schemes
The value added created by the organisation is shared with employees, based on a formula agreed upon by both management and employees.
3. Staff Performance Appraisal Linked to Productivity Improvements
Employees’ contributions to productivity efforts are recognised in their performance appraisals. Good performers should be rewarded with higher bonuses or salary increments.

Scope of Work of a Productivity Manager


The duties of a productivity manager include planning, coordinating, controlling and monitoring of productivity programmes within an organisation. The productivity manager is also responsible for getting cooperation from all management levels to achieve the productivity goals and objectives that have been set.

Attributes of a Productivity Manager


Knowledge


• Well-versed in productivity concepts, frameworks and tools
• Prior knowledge or relevant experience in the organisation’s sector of work

Abilities & skills


• Good people management and negotiation skills
• Strategic view of the organisation’s productivity objectives

Key Responsibilities of a Productivity Manager


• Establish productivity management structure, responsibilities and accountabilities
• Mobilise employees to participate in the productivity drive
• Manage and facilitate actions taken to improve productivity
• Establish productivity measurement system and performance management system Establish structure, responsibilities and accountabilities
• Review current reporting structure and assess if it is suitable for productivity management accountability
• Assess need for a productivity management committee or unit within the organisation
• Establish productivity accountability at different management levels
• Decide process of setting overall productivity goals

Mobilise employees

• Educate employees on:
 i. Meaning and scope of productivity, its benefits and how it can be improved and measured
 ii. Role of every employee and how to adopt a positive mindset towards productivity initiatives

• Communicate to employees on:
 i. Organisational objectives in productivity
 ii. Organisation’s targets and overall direction and strategy to achieve its productivity objectives

• Involve employees at different levels in the productivity drive by:
 i. Engaging them throughout the whole productivity journey - planning, development of measures and implementation of initiatives
 ii. Showing them the impact of their efforts in improving productivity and the consequent benefits
Manage and facilitate productivity improvements

• Diagnose
 i. Assess performance in relation to the key productivity levers
 ii. Identify areas for improvement and productivity levers to address

• Develop road map
 i. Work out action plan to address findings from diagnosis
 ii. Set targets and assign responsibilities
 iii. Monitor progress of actions taken

Establish productivity measurement system and performance management system
• Identify and implement measures to track productivity performance against targets and benchmarks
• Identify and implement employee incentive schemes to motivate employees



Productivity Improvement - Principles - Sumanth - 1984



David J Sumanth in his book Productivity Engineering and Management, published by McGraw Hill in 1984 listed the following principles in the chapter Productivity Improvement Concepts.

1. Microprocessor Principle
Whenever and wherever possible, design products and processes with microprocessor control.

2. Global-Market Principle
Design and manufacture products for global markets.

3. Learning Curve Principle
Wherever possible, plan productivity levels and product costs on a learning curve.

4.Secrecy Principle
Productivity improvement strategies that are novel when compared to the competitors must be kept secret.

5. Product-Mix Principle
Develop a product mix that consistently shows the largest gains in total market productivity and market share.

6. Emulation Principle
Take the best of at least three competitors' technologies in product design, development and production

7. Productivity Gain-Sharing Principle
Always, share the gains in productivity improvements with everyone directly or indirectly responsible for it, particularly employees and customers.

8. Leading Competitor Principle
Be the leading competitor for as many products/services as possible.

9. Harmony Principle
Seek harmony in human relations at all levels of management from the topmost executive down to the production/operations level employee.

10. International Outlook Principle
Keep an international perspective in management activities related to planning, research and development, marketing, operations/production,and technology transfer.

11. Cooperative Research Principle
Work closely with universities and generic research establishments to bring in ideas for productivity improvement.

12. Productivity Process Principle
Productivity improvement must be an ongoing, day-to-day process and not a one-time program or project

David Sumanth
https://books.google.co.in/books?id=mLAv09ocvTsC&pg=PA98#v=onepage&q&f=false

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=rtPSBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA603#v=onepage&q&f=false


Updated  21 April 2018,  6 February 2017, 25 November 2016

(C) Narayana Rao K.V.S.S. 2016

Friday, April 20, 2018

Lean Supply Chain and Lean Warehousing



__________________________


___________________________




Tortorella, Guilherme & Miorando, Rogério & Marodin, Giuliano. (2017).
"Lean Supply Chain Management: Empirical research on practices, contexts and performance", International Journal of Production Economics. 193. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.07.006.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318308013_Lean_Supply_Chain_Management_Empirical_research_on_practices_contexts_and_performance


Lean Supply Chain Management Practices


LSCM1 – Kanban or pull system     
LSCM2 – Close relationship between customer, supplier and relevant parties   
LSCM3 – Leveled scheduling or heijunka   
LSCM4 – Efficient and continuous replenishment 
LSCM5 – Two-way feedback assessment 
LSCM6 – Value chain management team 
LSCM7 – Win-win problem solving methodology 
LSCM8 – Value chain analysis or Value stream mapping 
LSCM9 – Keiretsu (suppliers play a strategic role marshalling the efforts of their own suppliers) 
LSCM10 – Kyoryokukai (suppliers' association that enhance lateral communication among suppliers, and act as an extra bulwark against customer opportunism)
LSCM11 – Intervention strategy (customer is able to cooperatively intervene in the supplier's business operation and bring about change for better)
LSCM12 – Material handling systems 
LSCM13 – Standardized work procedures to assure quality achievement 
LSCM14 – Open-minded and in depth market research conducted jointly (joint understanding of end-user requirements so that all players can work towards providing customer value)
LSCM15 – Open-book negotiation 
LSCM16 – Inbound vehicle scheduling 
LSCM17 – Hoshin Kanri (policy deployment and development of a strategy for the supply chain) 
LSCM18 – Development of supply chain KPIs 
LSCM19 – Outbound transportation 
LSCM20 – Establishment of distribution centers
LSCM21 – Consignment stock
LSCM22 – Functional packaging design


References for Lean Supply Chain Management Practices


LSCM1 – Kanban or pull system

Lamming, 1996; (2) Levy, 1997; (3) Naylor et al., 1999; (4) Jones et al., 2000; (5) McCullen and Towill, 2001; (6) Stratton and Warburton, 2003; (7) Alves Filho et al., 2004;

LSCM2 – Close relationship between customer, supplier and relevant parties 
(1) Lamming, 1996; (2) Levy, 1997; (3) Naylor et al., 1999;

LSCM3 – Leveled scheduling or heijunka 
(1) Lamming, 1996; (2) Levy, 1997; (3) Naylor et al., 1999;
(4) Jones et al., 2000; (5) McCullen and Towill, 2001;
(6) Stratton and Warburton, 2003; (7) Alves Filho et al., 2004;

LSCM4 – Efficient and continuous replenishment 
 (1) Lamming, 1996; (4) Jones et al., 2000; (6) Stratton and Warburton, 2003; (7) Alves Filho et al., 2004;
LSCM5 – Two-way feedback assessment
(1) Lamming, 1996; (2) Levy, 1997;

LSCM6 – Value chain management team 
(2) Levy, 1997; (7) Alves Filho et al., 2004;

LSCM7 – Win-win problem solving methodology 
(1) Lamming, 1996; (2) Levy, 1997; (6) Stratton and Warburton, 2003; (7) Alves Filho et al., 2004;
LSCM8 – Value chain analysis or Value stream mapping 
LSCM9 – Keiretsu (suppliers play a strategic role marshalling the efforts of their own suppliers)
LSCM10 – Kyoryokukai (suppliers' association that enhance lateral communication among suppliers, and act as an extra bulwark against customer opportunism)
LSCM11 – Intervention strategy (customer is able to cooperatively intervene in the supplier's business operation and bring about change for better)
LSCM12 – Material handling systems
LSCM13 – Standardized work procedures to assure quality achievement
LSCM14 – Open-minded and in depth market research conducted jointly (joint understanding of end-user requirements so that all players can work towards providing customer value)
LSCM15 – Open-book negotiation
LSCM16 – Inbound vehicle scheduling
LSCM17 – Hoshin Kanri (policy deployment and development of a strategy for the supply chain)
LSCM18 – Development of supply chain KPIs
LSCM19 – Outbound transportation
LSCM20 – Establishment of distribution centers
LSCM21 – Consignment stock
LSCM22 – Functional packaging design


Lean Supply Chain

Content in chapter 3 (The Machine that changed the world)

Supply Chain to Support Lean Production


The production of a car involves engineering and fabricating more than 10,000 major components and assembling them into around 100 major sub-assemblies - engines, transmissions, steering gears, suspensions, and so on.

Toyota took a new approach to organize this supply 10,000 major components. It termed the suppliers of complete sub-assemblies  as first tier suppliers. These first-tier suppliers form an integral part of the new product development team. They are given responsibility for detail engineering the sub-assembly. They are given the performance specification of the sub-assembly, which is developed with them as a part of the team developing the new car. The supplier has to deliver the prototype for testing and once approved, the production order was given. Thus the detailed engineering of the sub-assembly was done by the tier 1 supplier.  The tier 1 suppliers were encouraged to talk among themselves about ways to improve the design process.  Each first- tier supplier formed a second tier of suppliers for components.

Toyota takes some equity in some supplier companies and these companies are encouraged to take equity in Toyota. Toyota also acts as banker for its supplier group providing loans to finance the machinery for new products.

Toyota share personnel also with suppliers. It provides work-force when load surges and also deputes its managers. Toyota encourages its suppliers to produce for other companies also.

Kanban system: Kanban system is used in Toyota production system to implement Just-in-time (JIT). As a container of parts was used up, it was sent back to the previous step or the supplier and this becomes the signal to make one more container of parts. Reduction of inventories in the JIT system means any error will disrupt the production. But the power of JIT idea is to involve everybody in quality and timely production by removing safety stocks or nets.

It took Eiji Toyoda and Ohno more than twenty years to fully implement JIT within the Toyota supply chain. They succeeded and created a highly productive, high quality, responsive supply chain.


Chapter 6

Problem of supplying 10,000 parts for making a car.

Henry Ford's solution: Do everything in your factory.
Alfred Sloan's solution for GM - Do it all in your own company but set up decentralized parts making divisions.

Toyota's Lean Solution to Parts Supply

At the very outset of product development, the lean producer selects all the tier I suppliers. Lean producers assign a whole subassembly as a component to a first-tier supplier.

The first-tier suppliers assign their engineers as resident design engineers to the lean development program of the final assembler. The development typically starts two to three years prior to production. As product planning is completed with the help of various resident design engineers of various suppliers, the basic design of the subassembly is handed over to the respective supplier for detailed engineering. The detailed engineering is done with support from design engineers of tier 2 suppliers.

The lean producer takes care to learn an enormous amount about the supplier's production cost and quality. Such interchange take place because a rational framework exists for deciding price that gives adequate profit to the supplier. The contract between the buyer and seller establishes ground rules for quality assurance, ordering and delivery, proprietary rights, material supply and pricing over a long-term. The contract lays the basis for a cooperative relationship between the company and suppliers.

Lean Supply Practices

The system of establishing prices: The lean producers work on target pricing and costing. The lean assembler sets a target price for the car and with the suppliers, figures how the car can be made for this price while allowing reasonable profit for both the assembler and the suppliers. The basis of the system is "market price minus" rather than "supplier cost plus" rule.

To achieve target cost, both the assembler and the supplier use value engineering. Value engineering is used during design and it is also used during the entire production phase. We need to emphasize that industrial engineering is used during design as well as during the production phase. Actually, lean systems incorporate industrial engineering objective of efficiency and profit improvement through elimination of waste in the project right from the inception of the new product development. In lean systems, managers take a much more active part in the efficiency improvement by involving all their people in efficiency improvement along with other objectives.

Womack et al. comment that cost reduction is more focused in lean systems as costs can be ascertained more quickly and accurately due to short set up times and batch quantities.

Declining Prices and Costs: A second feature of lean supply is continually decreasing prices over the life of a model in components as well as the assembly. Lean producers and supply chain managers believe that learning curve benefits overcome inflation and plan for reduction in prices and costs.

There are agreements to share the cost decrease achieved in collaboration and for keeping the cost reduction benefits achieved by the supplier alone during the life of the model. So there is incentive to participate in the cost reduction activities during the entire life cycle of the product.

Delivery Schedule: In lean supply chains, the universal practice is to deliver components directly to the assembly line many times in a day, with no inspection of incoming parts.

Production smoothing (Heijunka): Lean producers try to smooth production not through inventory buildups but through other means and share ups and downs with supply chain.

Supplier Associations:  A final feature of lean supply is the supplier associations where the first tier suppliers of the company meet to share new finding on better ways to make business. That how the supply chain improvement effort is carried out. These supplier meets have been extremely important for disseminating such new concepts as statistical process control (SPC) and total quality control (TQC) in the late 1950s and early 1960s, value analysis and value engineering (VE) later in the 1960s, and the computer aided design (CAD) in the 1980s.


Research Papers


Emerald

Investigating “The Way” for Toyota suppliers: A quantitative outlook on Toyota's replicating efforts for supplier development
Type: Case study
Author(s): Phillip Marksberry
Source: Benchmarking: An International Journal Volume: 19 Issue: 2 2012


Development of lean supply chains: a case study of the Catalan pork sector
Type: Research paper
Author(s): Catalina Perez, Rodolfo de Castro, David Simons, Gerusa Gimenez
Source: Supply Chain Management: An International Journal Volume: 15 Issue: 1 2010


Improving construction supply chain collaboration and performance: a lean construction pilot project
Type: Research paper
Author(s): Per Erik Eriksson
Source: Supply Chain Management: An International Journal Volume: 15 Issue: 5 2010

Lean supply chain and its effect on product cost and quality: a case study on Ford Motor Company
Type: Case study
Author(s): H.M. Wee, Simon Wu
Source: Supply Chain Management: An International Journal Volume: 14 Issue: 5 2009


Strategic considerations in the development of lean agri-food supply chains: a case study of the UK pork sector
Type: Case study
Author(s): David H. Taylor
Source: Supply Chain Management: An International Journal Volume: 11 Issue: 3 2006

The making of a lean aerospace supply chain
Type: Case study
Author(s): L.M.J. Michaels
Source: Supply Chain Management: An International Journal Volume: 4 Issue: 3 1999


EBSCO




An Analysis on Application of Lean Supply Chain Concept for Construction Projects.
Full Text Available
By: Baladhandayutham, T.; Venkatesh, Shanthi. Synergy (0973-8819). Jan2012, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p25-36. 12p.

Modelling and analysis of workflow for lean supply chains.   Full Text Available
By: Ma, Jinping; Wang, Kanliang; Xu, Lida. Enterprise Information Systems. Nov2011, Vol. 5 Issue 4, p423-447.

A Lean Supply Chain Manifesto.   Full Text Available
By: Reese, Andrew K. Supply & Demand Chain Executive. Aug/Sep2006, Vol. 5 Issue 7, p23-27.

Build and Manage a Lean Supply Chain.   Full Text Available
By: Srinivasan, Mandyam M.; Srinivasan, Tanushree; Choi, Emily W. Industrial Management. Sep/Oct2005, Vol. 47 Issue 5, p20-25.


Books

Reinventing Lean: Introducing Lean Management into the Supply Chain (Google eBook)
Gerhard Plenert
Butterworth-Heinemann, 26-Jul-2010 - Technology & Engineering - 328 pages
http://books.google.co.in/books?id=aqP05Hch2ZUC


Lean Supply Chain: Collected Practices and Cases
Productivity Press
Productivity Press, 2006 - Business & Economics - 136 pages
http://books.google.co.in/books?id=3canWT9g5soC

Lean Supply Chain Management: A Handbook for Strategic Procurement
Jeffrey P. Wincel
Productivity Press, 2004 - Business & Economics - 239 pages
http://nraoiekc.blogspot.in/2013/10/lean-supply-chain-management-handbook.html
http://books.google.co.in/books?id=tmeVM41dTsMC


_____________________

_____________________



_____________________

______________________


______________________

______________________


Lean SCM Consultants

http://www.jnm.com/en/lean-scm

Lean Warehousing


______________________

______________________

Lean concept has been used in supply chain and warehousing



Presentations

Lean Supply Chain Management -  Principles and Practices - Prof Deborah Nightingale - 2005

https://www.quora.com/How-can-industrial-engineering-improve-supply-chain-processes-at-both-the-micro-and-macro-levels

Updated on 21 April 2018, 2 November 2013

The Productivity Crisis in Organizations - Paul Mali



The term crisis is intended to mean large troubles that are not necessarily fatal to organizations. A crisis requires major changes in organizations. It demands strategies, approaches and solutions that management has never before applied.

Productivity crisis in USA

The rate of productivity growth in the United States was 3.1 percent between 1960 and 1974. In some foreign countries it was double this figure. Productivity in local governments was growing at 1.5 percent only.

The chapter covers

1. Different views of productivity
2. Definition of productivity
3. Frustrations of organizations in the area of improving or managing productivity
4. Changes in environment that affect productivity management
5. Benefits of productivity improvement effort


Four Different References for Productivity

1. National Reference Point

2. Industry Reference Point

Measures productivity for specific industries.
Isolates the factors that affect productivity of specific industries like aerospace, automotive etc.

3. Individual Firm

4. Individual workers
The productivity of an individual is affected by the work environment, available tools, processes,  equipment and motivation.  Motivation for productivity is influenced by the group of which the individual is a member, the interplay with other groups and the reasons why the individual works.

The author explicitly stated that the books focuses on the individual firm and worker.

What is Productivity

Productivity is the measure of how well resources are brought together in organizations and utilized for accomplishing a set of results. Productivity is reaching the highest level of performance with the least expenditure of resources.  -  Paul Mali (page 6).

George Kuper, acting executive director of the National Commission on Productivity and Work Quality says - to determine productivity one must ask both whether a desired result was achieved and what resources were consumed to achieve it.  The measurement of the output (performance achievement) and input (resources consumed) is crucial in improving or managing productivity.


Productivity Frustrations in Organizations - Illustrations


Manufacturing Industry

1. A glass manufacturing plat instituted a cost control program with full backing of top management. But it seriously reduced revenues, which meant incidence of indirect cost on goods sold went up substantially and created losses.

2. In an auto manufacturing plan in Ohio, employees went on strike against a well thoughtout plan to increase the speed of assembly line. The plant was closed in the end.

3. A Connecticut hardware manufacturing company could not make changes in plant and equipment to improve productivity due to the opposition of the union.

What is  Different about Productivity Management Today?

Human expectation:  Workers are placing a higher value on themselves than they formally did.  A strong current now is developing for improvement in the quality of life at work.

New and Changing Technology:  The technological innovations are far ahead of application. The users find it nearly impossible to understand and keep up. Consequently, the use of these technological innovations is limited compared to what it could be.

Accountability is Still Limited.



Benefits from Managing Productivity by Objectives (MPBO)

1. MPBO provides score keeping data for evaluating organizations, departments or programs
2. MPBO sets up an accountability framework for scarce resources.
3. MPBO sets up incentives for both unions and management.
4. MPBO forces a search for unutilized opportunities.
5. MPBO gives an accurate assessment of value of capital outlay.
6. MPBO provides a focus for cost-benefit analysis.






Improving Total Productivity - Paul Mali 1978 - Chapter Summaries



Book:  Improving Total Productivity: MBO Strategies for Business, government, and Not-For-Profit Organizations

Paul Mali John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978

Part I: The Need to Improve Productivity

Chapter 1. The Productivity Crisis in Organizations

2. Organizational Trends affecting Productivity



Productivity Methodologies, Tools, and Techniques

Short columns to introduce the major productivity methodologies, tools, and techniques taught in the APO Development of Productivity Practitioners: Basic Program, and Advanced Program. These articles are contributed by the course trainers to help readers understand the basic concepts and selected topics from the course curricula.


http://www.apo-tokyo.org/productivity/pmtt_list.html

Monday, April 16, 2018

Cross-Functional Productivity Improvement - Ronald Blank - 2012 - Book Information




Cross-Functional Productivity Improvement - Ronald Blank - 2012

CRC Press, 06-Sep-2012 -  174 pages

The book starts with an overview of traditional productivity improvement methods. Subsequent chapters explain how different departments can affect productivity and describe what must be done to improve productivity. Supplies time-tested procedures for implementing cross-functional productivity actions that are applicable across a wide range of industries.

Includes many figures, illustrations, and tables that provide the technical information needed to implement sustainable productivity improvements

Readers will gain a clear understanding of exactly what to do and what not to do in all aspects of company operations to maximize productivity through a cross-functional approach. Furthermore, the book will enable companies to take better advantage of all that the ISO 9001 and similar systems have to offer by making best use of the interactions between the various elements of company operations.


Table of Contents

Basic Concepts

The Traditional Approach to Productivity Improvement
Efficiency and Lean Manufacturing
Material Flow
Ergonomics
Quality
Malpractice
Automation

Additional Considerations for the Cross-Functional Approach

Trainers and Training Methods
Effects of Purchasing Activities
Contract Review Technique
Internal Audits
Measuring Systems
Design Verification and Validation Activities
Effects of the Facility
Effects of Preventive Maintenance
Productivity and Human Resources
Employee Orientation
Policies and Procedures
Training
Compensation and Literacy Levels Workload
Employee Evaluation
Productivity and Your Quality Management System
PDCA Cycle
Quality Management System Issues
Calibration Issues
Sampling
Lack of Follow-Up on Corrective and Preventive
Actions
Productive Manufacturing
Work in Process
Effective versus Ineffective Statistical Process Control
Determining When and Where to Do SPC
Control Plans and PFMEAs
Starting SPC
Selecting SPC Personnel
When SPC Calls for Action
Handling, Storage, Packaging, and Preservation
Tooling and Equipment
Waste Prevention
Production Wastes
Support Activities Wastes
Productivity and Motivation
Employee Motivation
Goal Setting

Reliability of the Process and Manufacturing Equipment
Implementing Cross-Functional Productivity Improvement

Overcoming Resistance to Change
Glossary
Recommended Readings
Index

Google Book Link - Preview

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=2pBtY1SrogoC


Updated on 17 April 2018, 26 November 2013

Friday, April 6, 2018

India - Productivity Management Thesis




http://hdl.handle.net/10603/108758
Title: An exploration on the adoption design and modelling of strategic productivity management in manufacturing enterprises
Researcher: Murugesh, R
Guide(s): Natarajan, R
Keywords: Exploration
Manufacturing
Enterprises
Management
Productivity
University: Bharathiar University
Completed Date: 31/01/1997
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/108758


http://hdl.handle.net/10603/139101
Title: A study of managing cost and productivity of co-operative sugar industry in Solapur district
Researcher: Nikam, Ramhari S
Guide(s): Ekshinge, B B
Keywords: Cost
Industry
Managing
Productivity
Sugar
University: Shivaji University
Completed Date: 1995
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/139101









 


Upload Date Title Researcher Guide(s)
13-Oct-2015 Study of production and marketing management of Grapes in Pune District and strategies for increasing productivity and profitability Jagtap, Machhindra D. Shrigiriwar, S. V.
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/50910


28-Apr-2016 Management Of Funds For Productivity A Study Of Corporate Sector In India Dave, Ashvin R. Dr. A. Kumar
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/85870

6-Mar-2017 A study of managing cost and productivity of co-operative sugar industry in Solapur district Nikam, Ramhari S Ekshinge, B B
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/139101

18-Dec-2015 Application of artificial intelligence in production management with special reference to praga tools limited Hyderabad Rao,Pabbathi Vijaya Hampanna,M.

5-Oct-2016 Resource use management productivity and returns to scale of paddy forms of coastal Andhra Pradesh Adinarayana, S Prasad, Bhagawati
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/108109


8-Jan-2018 Productivity management of central co operative Bank and Bolangir Anchalik Gramya Bank Panda, Pramod Kumar Satpathy, Biswajit
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/187197


25-Apr-2016 A comparative study of supply chain management in organized vis a vis unorganized retail with special reference to perishable food products in Pune Singh Nityanand Javadekar Prachee

3-May-2016 A study of supply chain management in improving industrial productivity with reference to private sector industries in Nasik district 1991 to 2008 Khairnar Deepak Trymbak Berad R. R.
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/87185

4-Jan-2018 Supply chain management practices in health products of hll lifecare limited in trivandrum Rigin, E V Raja Mohan, S


10-Jan-2018 Management and Marketing of Dairy Products in Tamil Nadu Jagan N SATHYANARAYANAN K


26-Apr-2016 Information products management in digital environment A study with special reference to university libraries in A P Gangadharaiah,G. Chetty,P. Rajarathnam

16-Mar-2017 The utilization of plant products in disease management of Silkworm Bombyx Mori L Shivdas, Bhaisare Shailesh Bhawane, G P

8-Mar-2017 Development and analysis of pull control systems for effective management of production systems Sastry, G Gouripati Garg, Rajnish and Saxena, Mukesh

26-May-2017 Implication of fungalgrowth in poultry management and biogas production Allimuthu V Gopinath L R

27-Jan-2017 Bionomics and production management of modal tasar in Orissa Sahu, Shashwatisahu Mohanty, Prafulla Kumar

14-Dec-2015 Product management practices in Public Sector Undertakings Mynavathi, L Natarajan, P
10-Oct-2016 An exploration on the adoption design and modelling of strategic productivity management in manufacturing enterprises Murugesh, R Natarajan, R
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/108758





10-Jan-2018 Productivity management of rice a case study of Bargarh district of Western Orissa Hota, Sanjib Kumar Satpathy, Biswajit
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/187666




12-Oct-2015 A study of supply chain management as import substitution tool to reduce the cost per piece of product Agarkar Shrikant Bhaskarbhai Deepak Trymbak Khairnar
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/50815


21-Aug-2014 Workers participation in management and its impact on productivity Johari Pramod Mohan Bhowmik Sharit
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/23810



16-Sep-2014 An appraisal of relationship between human resource management and productivity _ a case study of bel electronics ltd Ghaziabad Pawan Kumar Mittal, J K
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/25120



16-Oct-2015 Socio_psychological constraints, their impact on productivity and labour_management relations a study of Aligarh lock industry Akhtar, Nahid Firoz, Nikhat
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/51779




8-Jan-2016 Personnel management and productivity in public sector industries in India Pramanik, Subhendu Ganguly, D S
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/68669



9-Mar-2016 Performance Management for productivity enhancement in Higher Education A comparative study of Private and Public Sector institutions in Gujarat Shital Bati N Dr A. Kumar
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/74781



3-Apr-2017 A study of correlation between competency of production managers and its impact on productivity of selected large companies in Pune region during 2010 to 2014 Bakre, Prajyakti Prasad Adsule, Anil
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/143990



21-Aug-2017 Development of integrated plant nutrient management module for higher productivity and quality in pea Singh, Rajiv Kumar Singh, Jagdish
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/168965


8-Jan-2018 Some optimisation studies for productivity management in cement industry, Satpathy, Biswajit Mohanty, R P
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/187139



27-Jun-2014 Studies on effect of integrated weed and nutrient Management on productivity of fodder sorghum cropping system under rain fed condition Srivastava, Manish Suman, Banwari Lal
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/19883

16-Nov-2017 Studies on the management of coastal salt Affected soil for improving soil fertility and productivity of medicinal plants Vembu. G
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/180911


27-Dec-2017 Studies On Indigenous Microorganisms IMOs Technology And Their Applications In Soil Fertility Plant Productivity And Chivken Poultry Management M.Somasekhar D.V.R.Sai Gopal
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/185476





24-Apr-2015 Wireless network management for productivity in BSNL Manipur Thingujam, Sharatchand Meetei Singh, W C
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/39677



20-Jun-2017 Effect of integrated nutrient management on the improvement of crop productivity in rice wheat sequence under irrigated ecosystem in Gangetic alluvial soil conditions of West Bengal Mitra, Shreya Sarkar, R K
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/156502




1
26-May-2017 Industrial management_ a study of productivity improvement in selected large scale industrial units Alamdari, Saber Khandan Bapat, S G
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/151460



9-Feb-2015 TALENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND ITS IMPACT ON ORGANIZATIONAL PRODUCTIVITY A STUDY WITH REFERENCE TO IT SECTOR IN BENGALURU SENTHILKUMAR. R Dr. A. KUMUDHA
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/33924



17-Jun-2015 Studies on integrated nitrogen management for sustaining sugarcane saccharum officinarum L productivity Udayakumar, A Selvin Jebaraj Norman, T
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/43270





27-Jul-2017 Breeding for high productive short duration heat tolerant lines in lentil Lens culinaris Medik and management for improved productivity Choudhury, Debashree Roy Kundagrami, Sabyasachi
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/163796

8-Jul-2014 Integrated Nutrient Management In Field Pea And Its Effect On Productivity In Succeeding Fodder Sorghum Sangwan, Ravi Pratap Singh Singh, T. P.
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/20506

8-Jul-2014 Effect of Planting Geometry and Phosphorus Nutrition Management on the Productivity of Pigeonpea Intercropping System Sharma, Umesh Chand Shivay, Y. S.
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/20512

23-Dec-2015 Development of optimisation models in some related areas of production management Roy, Supriyo Mukhopadhyay, S
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/63910


27-Jul-2017 Breeding for salinity tolerance and management for improved productivity in Chickpea Cicer Arietinum L Das, Mousumi Kundagrami, Sabyasachi
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/164078

10-Mar-2016 Integrated management system to improve the competitiveness of organisations through safety quality productivity SQP trilogy Gopalakrishnan, K Rajendran, M
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/75079

27-Jan-2017 Seed borne fungi of sesamum affecting crop productivity and their management Mohanty, Sanghamitra Narain, A
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/128617


17-Jan-2017 Studies on the implementation of continued total productive management in Indian industry to achieve business excellence Vardhan, Sachit Gupta, Pardeep
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/125647


10-Jan-2018 Productivity management in agricultural sector A case study of Bargarh district of Western Orissa Pradhan, Kshirod Kumar Satpathy, Biswajit
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/187944



9-Nov-2015 EFFECT OF INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT ON PRODUCTIVITY PROFITABILITY AND SEED QUALITY IN OKRA PEA CROPPING SYSTEM RANA, RACHNA Badiyala, Dinesh
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/56066

31-May-2017 The impact of japanese management techniques on the motivation and productivity of shop floor personnel of large manufacturing organizations in the vicinity of Pune Bhatawdekar, Kalpana Kulkarni, Arvind A
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/152836



15-Apr-2016 Assessment of management induced changes on cropping pattern and its productivity _ a case study of Sujala watershed Haveri district of Karnataka Nayaka, Suresh S Raja Naika
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/81929


28-Feb-2018 A study on human resource management and its impact on productivity in Bharat heavy electricals limited_Tiruchirapalli Gomathi, S Arulanandam, M A
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/193105




30-Jul-2013 EFFECT OF LONG TERM INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ON SOIL AND CROP PRODUCTIVITY IN RICE WHEAT CROP SEQUENCE, Renu Sharma H.L. Sharma
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603/10187