Tuesday, September 16, 2014

International Asia Conference on Industrial Engineering and Management Innovation (IEMI2012) Proceedings - Book Information




http://books.google.co.in/books?id=NaUq-Qkm-fMC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false


Springer Publication

1763 pages


The International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management is sponsored by the Chinese Industrial Engineering Institution, CMES, which is the only national-level academic society for Industrial Engineering.


The conference is held annually. Being the largest and the most authoritative international academic conference held in China, it provides an academic platform for experts and entrepreneurs in the areas of  industrial engineering and management to exchange their research findings. Many experts in various fields from China and around the world gather together at the conference to review, exchange, summarize and promote their achievements in the fields of industrial engineering and engineering management. For example, some experts pay special attention to the current state of the application of related techniques in China as well as their future prospects, such as green product design, quality control and management, supply chain and logistics management to address the need for, amongst other things low-carbon, energy-saving and emission-reduction. They also offer opinions on the outlook for the development of related techniques. The proceedings offers impressive methods and concrete applications for experts from colleges and universities, research institutions and enterprises who are engaged in theoretical research into industrial engineering and engineering management and its applications. As all the papers are of great value from both an academic and a practical point of view, they also provide research data for international scholars who are investigating Chinese style enterprises and engineering management.



The first paper is on TRIZ

Thursday, September 11, 2014

Lean Manufacturing Issues in India - 2014


Lean Manufacturing



Lean manufacturing is a conceptual framework based on implementation of industrial engineering in an innovative way by Toyota executives. Now certain principles are derived from it. Its objective is to improve productivity by reducing  waste and decreasing cycle time. .  LMS has shorter manufacturing and new product lead times; team based work organization with responsibility for producing finished products and components of acceptable quality with self inspection in just in time manner. JIT system also employs a smaller supplier  base providing JIT deliveries.

Lean concepts form part of  world-class manufacturing philosophies that advocate utilizing the resources efficiently and effectively. .


The survey, the results of which are summarised in this post,  is based on  71 respondents from thirty two Industries and 63 from forty two Technical Institutions in India.

The key issues for any organization to implement LMS


They are identified as follows:

Inventory: For the implementation of LMS, 27 % and 39 % respondents rate Inventory as a very important and important issue respectively. Reduction of inventory is the basis for JIT.

The cumulative 56 % response indicates that majority consider inventory as a key issue.

Lead-time: For the implementation of LMS, 31 % and 30 % respondents rate Lead-time as a very important and important issue respectively. Reduction of cycle time is another important issue to lean journey.

LMS find out the wastage to time in the processes and eliminate it on regular basis.

Rejection: For the implementation of LMS, 21 % and 11 % respondents rate rejection as a very important and important issue respectively. Rejections have to be brought down to reduce cycle time as well as inventory

This response indicates that more attention has to be paid towards rejection control to improve lead-time and quality of the products. LMS helps in control rejection.

Transportation Cost: For the implementation of LMS, 4 % and 40% respondent's rate transportation cost as a very important and important issue respectively.  Indian companies have to come out with transport solutions that make small lot transportation compete with large lot transportation.

Transportation time and cost play a big role in Inventory accumulation. A proper logistic management will help Indian organizations to reduce the transportation as well as inventory cost. For example In India M/s Transystem Logistics does "Milk runs" for Toyota Kirloskar Motor's (TKM) manufacturing plant (Gupta, 2003) and it  helps TKM to work on the principles of JIT as well as to optimize the inventory levels. LMS advocates the removal of the waste in transportation.

Break down Maintenance: For the implementation of LMS, 13 % and 34% respondent's rate break down maintenance as a very important and important issue respectively. Breakdowns have to be brought down.
Without high availability of machines with proper maintenance it is very difficult to commit deliveries and maintain quality. With a proper maintenance system, which leads to TPM, LMS improve the Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE).

House keeping: For the implementation of LMS, 19 % and 39 % respondents rate house keeping as a very important and important issue respectively. This shows people understand the importance of clean and visible work place.

A good house keeping is required to pick the required items quickly and start the work.  The principles of motion economy recommend keeping all item in designated places and Japanese 5 S program incorporates it.and it became a  basic principle of LMS.

Product Design / Changes in Design: For the implementation of LMS, 19 % and 34 % respondent's rate product design and design changes as a very important and important issue respectively. Value engineering exercise is important for reducing waste that exist due to product designs.In today's competitive world where the variety of products decides any organization's market share, proper management of Product design and its changes is very important. LMS is extended to design activity also in Japan. It helps for a speedy product design and its changes.

Process Selection: For the implementation of LMS, 22 % and 30 % respondents rate Process selection as a very important and important issue respectively. Cellular manufacturing has to be followed.A proper selection of process decides the throughput time, effective utilization of the available resources such as machines, skilled manpower etc. LMS declares overprocessing as a waste and thus helps to identify process waste and  makes selection of a proper process an important decision.

Supplier & Vendor Relations: For the implementation of LMS, 30 % and 27 % respondents rate Supplier Relations as a very important and important issue respectively. For implementing JIT there has to be change in supplier and vendor relations


For the implementation of LMS, 28 % and 24 % respondents rate vendor relations as a very important and important issue respectively. As discussed earlier mutual trust and win-win strategy with suppliers and vendors helps to strengthen the whole supply chain. A healthy relationship with suppliers is possible with the implementation of LMS as well as it is the base for LMS.

Material Handling: For the implementation of LMS, 22 % and 33 % respondents rate Material handling as a very important and important issue respectively. Material handling can be redesigned to increase efficiency.

Waste identification and elimination in material handling system through LMS leads to Lead-time improvement; reduce throughput time reduction and minimization of rejections due to transportation.

Information Technology: For the implementation of LMS, 27 % and 40 % respondents rate Information Technology as a very important and important issue respectively. JIT systems do require MRP and other planning techniques.


It is very clear for the response that use of IT in every field of operations will help to take decisions at faster rate and accurately. IT helps to minimize the wastage due to repetitive nature of work. It also save a lot of time, which is very crucial in today's competitive world. A well planned IT system for the business is must to implement LMS in any organization.

The key issues for the purpose of Inventory Management:


Small Batch Production: For the implementation of LMS, 18 % and 30 % respondents rate small batch production keeping as a very important and important issue respectively. For better lead time and variety products small batch production is the need of hour. It also helps to maintain the Inventory level. LMS principles support organizations to produce small batch production.

Setup time reduction: For the implementation of LMS, 27% and 33 % respondents rate setup time reduction as a very important and important issue respectively. To produce small batch production setup time reduction is very essential. Single Minute Exchange of Die (SMED) principles developed by Shingo (1989) helps the person on shop floor to reduce the setup time.

Nearby Suppliers: For the implementation of LMS, 15 % and 43 % respondents rate nearby suppliers as a very important and important issue respectively. For faster delivery of components / material nearby suppliers are still considered very well owing to the logistics problem in India. Also the amount of follow up required with suppliers and vendors can be reduced with a proper online system and mutual trust. The global market provides an opportunity to select suppliers and vendors from any part of the world.

Nearby Customers: For the implementation of LMS, 10 % and 45 % respondents rate nearby customers as a very important and important issue respectively. This shows that some times logistics related problems affect the decision of entering in far away markets. But in today's world a manufacturer has little choice of customer selection.

Direct Online Suppliers: For the implementation of LMS, 25 % and 30 % respondents rate Direct Online suppliers as a very important and important issue respectively. The impact of Information Technology in our day to day life is reflecting in the supply chain management. LMS helps to design Lean Supply Chain.

The key issues in the area of Quality are analyzed as under


Process Control: For the implementation of LMS, 46 % and 33 % respondents rate Process Control as a very important and important issue respectively. As the selection of process is important, its control is also important from the LMS point of view. A controlled process will produce defect free products consistently, which is necessary for the implementation of LMS.

Vendor Development: For the implementation of LMS, 21 % and 31 % respondents rate Vendor Development as a very important and important issue respectively. Vendor development is the aspect on which every organization is working seriously. In today's outsourcing world the effectiveness of the supply chain depends more on the vendors and suppliers. The success of LMS depends on the proper network of loyal vendors.

Level of Automation: For the implementation of LMS, 24 % and 42 % respondents rate Automation as a very important and important issue respectively. Many persons see automation as an alternative to manual work owing to its numerous advantages, but in Indian conditions we have to adopt it very carefully looking to the cost involvement.

Measurement of Quality: For the implementation of LMS, 31 % and 37 % respondents rate Quality measurement as a very important and important issue respectively. Measurement is required to understand the present level of rework and for improving it.

The quality of products at every stage of manufacturing is very important in LMS and thus to ensure it a quality measurement system should be in its place.

The key issues in the area of Maintenance


They are analyzed as under

Spare Parts Management: For the implementation of LMS, 24 % and 51 % respondents rate house keeping as a very important and important issue respectively. The cumulative 75 % importance level clearly indicates that non-availability of spare parts causes great difficulty for maintenance of equipment. Thus it is very crucial to have right spare parts available at right time and in right quantity.

Cleanliness: For the implementation of LMS, 31 % and 27 % respondents rate cleanliness as a very important and important issue respectively. A good housekeeping and cleanliness provides a base for any advanced manufacturing system.

Application of TPM: For the implementation of LMS, 21 % and 52 % respondents rate Total Productive Maintenance as a very important and important issue respectively. The availability of equipment at the required time is must for the implementation of LMS and it is possible only with the application of TPM.

Worker's participation: For the implementation of LMS, 39 % and 39 % respondents rate worker's participation as a very important and important issue respectively. It is not true only for the maintenance issues as asked in questionnaire but in all aspect of LMS. The active participation of the entire workforce is sought for the success of any activity. The teamwork provides the perfect base for the implementation of LMS.

Conclusions

The authors made the conclusion that the participants in the survey are  clear about the concepts of LMS.


Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal > July 1, 2009
Nitin Upadhye, S G Deshmukh, Suresh Garg,


Barriers in Implementation of Lean Manufacturing System in Indian industry: A survey 

Rakesh Kumar
Research Scholar, Mechanical Engineering Department,
YMCA University of Science and Technology,
Faridabad-121006 (Haryana), India.
Dr. Vikas Kumar

Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering Department,
YMCA University of Science and Technology,
Faridabad-121006 (Haryana), India.
Abstract: Lean Manufacturing system has been acknowledged by Indian industry as a capable system in enhancing organisational performance by focusing on elimination of waste from the manufacturing system and thus improving effectiveness of the organisation.  Though if used on full scale as organisational culture it can produce significant improvement in organisational performance. This paper has attempted to explore the key barriers in extensive implementation of Lean Manufacturing even after two decades of introduction with Indian industry.
International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology (IJLTET)
Vol. 4 Issue 2 July 2014
http://ijltet.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/33.pdf


A Qualitative Study on Barriers of Implementation of Lean Manufacturing: An Indian Cotext (Delhi NCR Region)
Akhil Kumar
The International Journal Of Engineering And Science (IJES)
|| Volume || 3 || Issue || 4 || Pages || 21-28 || 2014 ||
ISSN (e): 2319 – 1813 ISSN (p): 2319 – 1805
www.theijes.com The IJES Page 21
http://www.theijes.com/papers/v3-i4/Version-2/C03402021028.pdf


BECOMING LEAN ENTERPRISE: THEORY AND CASE STUDIES - Company Based Customized Programmes and  Management Development Programme at NITIE, Mumbai, India

Wednesday, September 10, 2014

A Process Outlook for Industrial Engineering - Course Videos Information



Bilkent Online Courses

IE-102 A Process Outlook for Industrial Engineering
Prof. Nesim Erkip
2013-2014- Spring



Playlist of 34 Videos

_________________________

_________________________

Tuesday, September 9, 2014

Lean for Systems Engineering with Lean Enablers for Systems Engineering - Bodan W. Oppenheim - Book Information

2011
John Wiley & Sons

It is a 'must read' for any engineer and manager trying to establish and maintain lean practices and principles in their systems engineering/product development processes.


http://books.google.co.in/books?id=cxTi7gzd9o0C


Table of Contents

1. Introduction.

1.1 Introducing Lean Systems Engineering and Lean Enablers for Systems Engineering.

1.2 Organization of the Book.

2. A Brief History of Recent Management Paradigms.

2.1 From TQM to Six Sigma and Lean.

2.2 Lean Six Sigma.

3. Lean Fundamentals.

3.1 Value.

3.2 Waste.

3.3 Lean Principles.

3.4 The Lean Symphony of the Principles.

4. Lean in Product Development.

4.1 Review of Progress.

4.2 The Method of Lean Product Development Flow (LPDF).

5. From Traditional to Lean Systems Engineering.

5.1 Successes and Failures of Traditional Systems Engineering.

5.2 Waste in Traditional Systems Engineering.

5.3 Beginnings of Lean Systems Engineering.

5.4 Lean Systems Engineering Working Group of InCOSE.

5.5 Value in Lean Systems Engineering.

6. Development of Lean Enablers for Systems Engineering (LEfSE).

6.1 Strategy.

6.2 Development of LEfSE).

6.3 Survey.

6.4 Benchmarking with NASA and GAO Recommendations.

6.5 Version 1.0 and Awards.

7. Lean Enablers for System Engineering.

7.1 Organization.

7.2 Tables with Lean Enablers for Systems Engineering (LEfSE).

8. General Guidance for Implementation.

8.1 General Guidance for Implementing LEfSE.

8.2 Early Case Studies.

Glossary of Abbreviations.

Glossary of Idioms, Colloquialisms and Foreign Expressions (bold and italicized in the text).

References.

Appendix 1. INCOSE Web Page with LEfSE.

Appendix 2. Mapping of LEfSE onto INCOSE SE Processes.

Friday, July 4, 2014

Research Papers - Industrial Engineering - 2012 Collection



Human Effort Engineering


Job Evaluation and Wage Incentives

Motivating with efficiency wages and  delayed payments
2011
http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/ICS/InsightsAndConvenings/upload/research-for-the-real-world-03-11.pdf



Multiskilling

Fixed task zone chaining: worker coordination and zone design for inexpensive cross-training in serial CONWIP lines.
Parvin, Hoda; Van Oyen, Mark P.; Pandelis, Dimitrios G.; Williams, Damon P.; Lee, Junghee. IIE Transactions. Oct2012, Vol. 44 Issue 10, p894-914.

System Efficiency Engineering


Facilities Location

An efficient formulation of the flow refueling location model for alternative-fuel stations.
Capar, Ismail; Kuby, Michael. IIE Transactions. Aug2012, Vol. 44 Issue 8, p622-636.


Inspection

Optimum inspection interval for a system under periodic and opportunistic inspections.
Taghipour, Sharareh; Banjevic, Dragan. IIE Transactions. Nov2012, Vol. 44 Issue 11, p932-948.



Production, Project - Planning, Routing and Scheduling


The therapist routing and scheduling problem.
Shao, Yufen; Bard, Jonathan F.; Jarrah, Ahmad I. IIE Transactions. Oct2012, Vol. 44 Issue 10, p868-893.


Sequencing jobs on a non-Markovian machine with random disruptions.
Aytuğ, Haldun; Paul, Anand. IIE Transactions. Aug2012, Vol. 44 Issue 8, p671-680

Two-machine lot streaming with attached setup times. (Telecommunications domain)
Alfieri, Arianna; Glass, Celia; van de Velde, Steef. IIE Transactions. Aug2012, Vol. 44 Issue 8, p695-710.



Supply Chain

Risk diversification and risk pooling in supply chain design.
Mak, Ho-Yin; Shen, Zuo-Jun (Max). IIE Transactions. Aug2012, Vol. 44 Issue 8, p603-621.


Supply chain coordination with information sharing in the presence of trust and trustworthiness.
Voigt, Guido; Inderfurth, Karl. IIE Transactions. Aug2012, Vol. 44 Issue 8, p637-654.



From IIE Transactions - Ebsco Host Website

Thursday, July 3, 2014

Energy Use Efficiency - IE for Energy Resource




Energy Conservation




Save Energy in your Home Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Systems


HVAC Energy Saving Brochure - West Virginia

Summer HVAC Maintenance Tips to Save Energy and Money - ASE - Alliance To Save Energy 


Energy Efficient Computer Use



Original knol - http://knol.google.com/k/narayana-rao/energy-use-efficiency-ie-for-energy/2utb2lsm2k7a/ 3539#

Updated 3 June 2014, 20 April 2012

Tuesday, June 3, 2014

IE Profession - Is it focusing on improving the productivity of human resources at every level?



IE profession earns a bad name when it focuses on eliminating the need of people in production systems. It creates unemployment and underemployment and social tensions.

It can focus on improving productivity of human resource at every level and thereby increase the earnings of people across the society and do a service to the society. It means at every level, it adjusts the input combination around a person to improve his productivity.

In Germany such an approach is taken in the society in contrast to USA where elimination of manpower has become an obsession.


http://blogs.hbr.org/2014/05/why-germany-dominates-the-u-s-in-innovation/