Industrial Engineering is System Efficiency Engineering. It is Machine Effort and Human Effort Engineering. 2.26 Million Page View Blog. 193,075 visitors.
Blog Provides Industrial Engineering Knowledge: Articles, Books, Case Studies, Course Pages and Materials, Lecture Notes, Project Reviews, Research Papers Study Materials, and Video Lectures.
Blog provides full IE Online Course Notes
"Industrial Engineering is System Efficiency Engineering and Human Effort Engineering." - Narayana Rao.
Actually system efficiency engineering is sufficient description for industrial engineering scope and activity. But human effort engineering is added to highlight the fact that all among all engineering branches industrial engineering has the maximum focus on human effort in engineering systems. The role of man in machine system is studied in detail and engineering of the effort is done so that it is effective as per the requirement of the machine operation and efficient and comfortable to the operator;.
Industrial engineering is 80% Engineering - 20% Human Motions and Movements
Industrial engineering is 80% Engineering
Industrial engineering adds value in organizations through engineering changes that it identifies, develops, and installs in engineering systems in products, components, materials, machines, methods (machine operation steps specifications), energy related aspects and information system.
We can say industrial engineering is done on Inputs - Process - Output.
Industrial engineering is intensive engineering.
Engineering changes identified by industrial engineers demand use of engineering intensively and creatively to develop the engineering solution and implement it. It is in areas of complete product design, component design, material specification, machine specification, machine accessories and tooling specification, machine work holding specification, machine operation specification, mechanical handling of the material, maintaining atmospheric conditions in the shop and work cells, energy input and utilization, information generation, processing, storage, communication and action etc.
The study of human motions and movements and the time taken to make those motions does occupy only around 20% or less of industrial engineers' effort. 80% of the activities are in the area of engineering.
Effective and successful Industrial engineering practice requires engineers of highest calibre as in the role of industrial engineering they have to use full engineering knowledge to locate engineering change opportunities that will enhance productivity in any element of the engineering system. In comparison, core engineers can specialize in design of specific machine components and work on the topic for many years in their service. Not so in industrial engineering. From day one, industrial engineer has to remember much bigger set of engineering knowledge, keep abreast of technical developments and make effort to absorb them into the technology as fast as possible.
Industrial engineering is continuous engineering of products and processes.
Industrial engineers work on the shop floor along with operating engineers and do engineering changes on a continuous basis and improve the products and processes so that they are more productive and less costly and thus make sure that market grows for the product on a continuous basis. They do take care of many complaints of operators regarding process difficulties and make sure that process improvement is continuous.
We can say: What is IE?
Industrial engineering is Gemba based (現場) continuous engineering of products and processes to increase productivity/efficiency/cost reduction.
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING MANAGER
RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES
Analyse and evaluate efficient working of all projects and administer all processes and methods according to required supply standards and systems.
Assist to organize and approve all labour and supply cost annually and prepare reports to measure all labour performance.
Analyse all product costs and assist to reduce all negative variance on same and prepare strategies to reduce labour and wastage in all engineering projects.
Assist Industrial Engineering department to design business plans and develop salary for all employees and prepare all required reports on weekly and monthly basis and manage all communication with production management.
Develop salary model budgets for all industrial engineering processes and provide support to all world class manufacturing facilities and analyse all waste elimination plans and develop appropriate factory flow analysis on processes.
Maintain and update knowledge for all manufacturing engineering processes and design all processes for manpower and associate program and monitor all productivity and ensure compliance to all safety standards.
Evaluate and perform investigation on all variances for all planned and actual results for industrial processes and maintain track of all information and ensure integrity of all results for processes.
Supervise reporting processes on everyday basis and manage everyday activities and ensure adherence to all fiscal budgets and prepare strategic models.
Machine Work Study - Machines and Tools Related Efficiency/Productivity Analysis
The machines, accessories and tools used to perform the operation needs to analysed logically to identify process improvement opportunities to increase productivity and engineering has to be done to modify the process to use new equipment, accessories, tools and modified equipment, accessories or tools.
_______________
_______________
_______________
________________
Some Questions regarding Machines, Tools and Equipment - Introduction
Can a foot device be arranged so that an operation now performed by hand can be done by foot?
Are raw materials properly placed? Are there racks for pans of material and containers for smaller parts? Can the parts be secured without searching and selecting? Are the most frequently
used parts placed in the most convenient location? Are the handling methods and equipment satisfactory? Would a roller or a belt conveyer facilitate handling? Can the parts be placed aside by means of a chute?
Is the design of the apparatus the best from the viewpoint of manufacturing economy? Can the design be changed to facilitate machining or assembly without affecting the quality of the apparatus? Are tools designed so as to insure minimum manipulation time? Can eccentric clamps or ejectors be used?
Is the job on the proper machine? Are the correct feeds and speeds being used? Would a bench of special design be bettor than a standard bench? Is the work area properly laid out?
Such questions examine th emachines, equipment and related aspects.
Relation of Machine Work Study - Industrial Engineering to Quality. Industrial Engineering and a method of it, machine work study focus primarily on eliminating waste and reducing costs. In so doing, it is imperative that nothing should be done to impair the quality of the finished product or
its saleability. F.W. Taylor particularly stated it explicitly and also in product industrial engineering method, value engineering L.D. Miles stated it explicitly. Industrial engineers exist and do their work to enhance the competitive position of his company's products, he quite naturally must take a keen interest in the factor of quality. Products of superior quality outsell products of inferior quality, other things being equal; hence, an improvement in quality is always desirable and efforts to preserve it are made by IEs. Industry engineer is quite likely to discover ways of making the product better. In addition, because he eventually sets up working methods that are easy, efficient methods, and because he trains all operators to follow those methods, a higher and more uniform quality of workmanship results than where each operator is left to develop methods for himself. As a result, therefore, methods study either of machine work or human work tends to raise the quality of the finished product.
Industrial engineers examines every detail in the engineering system or production system, that is likely to affect operating time and cost. Experience leads to the recognition of the points at which the greatest possibilities for improvement lie, and the major part of the study will be made on them.
In a machine shop, the term "setup" is loosely used throughout industry to signify the workplace layout, the adjusted machine tool, or the elemental operations performed to get ready to do the job and to tear down after the job has been done. More exactly, the arrangement of -the material, tools, and supplies that is made preparatory to doing the job may be referred to as the " workplace layout." Any tools, jigs, and fixtures located in a definite position for the purpose of doing a job may be referred to as "being set up' or as "the setup." The operations that precede and follow the performing of the repetitive elements of the job during which the workplace layout or setup is first made and
subsequently cleared away may be called "make-ready" and "put-away" operations. For the sake of clearness, the more exact phraseology will be used throughout this book, although the workplace layout, the setup, and the make-ready and putaway operations are all considered under item 6 on the analysis sheet.
The workplace layout and the setup, or both, are important because they largely determine the method and motions that must be followed to do the job. If the workplace layout is improperly made, longer motions than should be necessary will be required to get materials and supplies. It is not uncommon to find a layout arranged so that it is necessary for the operator to take a step or two every time he needs material, when a slight and entirely practical rearrangement of the workplace layout
would make it possible to reach all material, tools, and supplies from one position. Such obviously energy-wasting layouts are encountered frequently where methods studies have not been made and when encountered serve to emphasize the importance of and the necessity for systematic operation Analysis.
The manner in which the make-ready and put-away operations are performed is worthy of study, particularly if manufacturing quantities are small, necessitating frequent changes hi layouts and setups. On many jobs involving only a few pieces, the time required for the make-ready and put-away operations is greater than the time required to do the actual work. The importance of studying carefully these no-nrepetitive operations is therefore apparent. When it can be arranged, it is often advisable to have certain men perform the make-ready and put-away operations and others do the work. The setup men become skilled at making workplace layouts and setups, just as the other men
become skilled at the more repetitive work. In addition, on machine work it is usually possible to supply them with a standard tool kit for use in making setups, thus eliminating many trips
to the locker or to the toolroom.
The tool equipment used on any operation is most important, and it is worthy of careful study. Repetitive jobs are usually tooled up efficiently, but there are many opportunities for savings
through the use of well-designed tools on small-quantity work which are often overlooked. For example, if a wrench fits a given nut and is strong enough for the work it is to do, usually
little further attention is given to it. There are many kinds of wrenches, however. The list includes monkey wrenches, openend wrenches, self-adjusting wrenches, socket wrenches, ratchet wrenches, and various kinds of power-driven wrenches. The time required to tighten the same nut with each type of wrench is different. The more efficient wrenches cost more, of course, but for each application there is one wrench that can be used with greater over-all economy than any other. Therefore, it pays to study wrench equipment in all classes of work. The same remarks apply to other small tools.
Jigs, fixtures, and other holding devices too often are designed without thought of the motions that will be required to operate them. Unless a job is very active, it may not pay to redesign an inefficient device, but the factors that cause it to be inefficient may be brought to the attention of the tool designer so that future designs will be improved.
Under the head of "Setup," a description is given of the workplace layout and the arrangement of tools, fixtures, and so on. This description may be written if the setup is simple, but a photograph will be found more useful and infinitely clearer if the arrangement is at all complex. It would require several hundred words, for example, to describe the workplace layout pictured in Fig. 44, and even then it would be difficult to visualize the layout in its entirety. The picture tells the story at a glance and shows clearly the arrangement of the workplace at the time of the analysis.
When the machine setup is being considered, the tool equipment also is examined. The tools and the setup are so closely related that it is difficult to separate them, and nothing is gained by attempting to do so. In examining the setup of the milling machine, it is noted at once that a standard vise and a special side cutter are used. A description of these items of tool equipment is therefore recorded. Often, when tool equipment is examined with thoughts of job improvement uppermost in mind,
suggestions for improving the tool equipment will immediately occur to the analyst. These should be recorded as they arise, even though they may reoccur during the consideration of items 7 and 9. It is better to duplicate the small amount of writing involved than to risk the possibility of overlooking a good idea.
More Detailed Questions on Machine, Equipment and Tools
The tools and equipment used to perform the operation needs to analysed logically. The following questions are the sort that will lead to suggested improvements:
1. Is the machine tool best suited to the performance of the operation of all tools available?
2. Would the purchase of a better machine be justified?
3. Can the work be held in the machine by other means to better advantage?
4. Should a vise be used?
5. Should a jig be used?
6. Should clamps be used?
7. Is the jig design good from a motion-economy standpoint?
8. Can the part be inserted and removed quickly from the jig?
9. Would quick-acting cam-actuated tightening mechanisms be desirable on vise, jig, or clamps?
10. Can ejectors for automatically removing part when vise or jig is opened be installed?
11. Is chuck of best type for the purpose?
12. Would special jaws be better?
13. Should a multiple fixture be provided?
14. Should duplicate holding means be provided so that one may be loaded while machine is making a cut on a part held in the other?
15. Are the cutters proper?
16. Should high-seed steel or cemented carbide be used?
17. Are tools properly ground?
18. Is the necessary accuracy readily obtainable with tool and fixture equipment available?
10. Are hand tools pre-positioned ?
20. Are hand tools best suited to purpose?
21. Will ratchet, spiral, or power-driven tools save time?
22. Are all operators provided with the same tools?
23. Can a special tool be made to improve the operation?
24. If accurate work is necessary, are proper gages or other measuring instruments provided?
25. Are gages or other measuring instruments checked for accuracy from time to time?
Because of the wide variety of tools available for different kinds of work, this list could be extended almost indefinitely with specific questions. Foundries, forge shops, processing industries, assembly plants, and so on all have different kinds of tools, and different questions might be asked in each case. The list given above, drawn up principally and by no means completely for machine work, will indicate the kind of searching, suggestive questions that should be asked. A special list might well be drawn up by each individual plant to cover the kind of tools that might be advantageously applied upon its own work.
Equipment.—A study of existing equipment may suggest changes and improvements or repairs. Machine operations should be those which combine economy with uniformity of standard quality. Standard times and methods are dependent upon standardization of machines within each class (using the best machines for operations), and the maintenance of normal conditions with respect to their upkeep. (https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2019/07/operation-study-arthur-g-anderson-1928.html)
Tools: For the most part, it may be said that the tools do function properly from the standpoint of the finished job. But from a productivity angle, industrial engineer has to examine the productivity possible from the existing tool and has to compare it with productivity possible from alternative tools to decide the appropriate alternative. Industrial engineers have to receive information regarding new tools from purchase department, representatives of organizations selling tools, consultants and technical literature being procured by the company. Industrial engineers have to monitor technology and engineering developments on a continuous basis and have to set up libraries for their departments or there have to sections within the company library for industrial engineering materials.
Similarly, whether, the jigs and fixtures etc. function properly from a motion-economy standpoint is subject to evaluation by industrial engineers. The tool designer is usually more concerned with making a tool that will do a certain job than he is with the motions that will be required to operate it. Therefore, unless he has made a study of the principles of methods engineering or has had the importance of motion economy impressed upon him in some other way, it is probably safe to say that the motions required to operate the tool are the last thing he thinks of.
There can be alternative work holding methods that require less time to use. The common machine vise takes a lot of time set up the work piece. The quick-acting vise is far superior. On machining operations where the cutting time is short, it will save 20 to 40 per cent of the total operation time. The jaws of the vise are cam-actuated. They are tightened by moving the two levers in opposite directions which conforms to the principles of motion economy. They hold securely without hammering on the levers. They are adjustable to a variety, of sizes of work. In short, they possess many real advantages over the standard vise.
Suggestions that will improve the quickness of operation of tools should be made to tool designers as they are conceived. If they are presented with a summary of the yearly saving in dollars and cents that they will effect, interest in better tool design from a use-time standpoint will be aroused. Tool designers as a group are clever and ingenious, and if the importance of reducing the time required to operate tools is clearly demonstrated, they will be able to assist materially toward this end by producing more suitable designs.
Hand Tools. Too little attention to the hand tools used upon even the more repetitive operations. There is choice available in even simple hand tool as a screw driver from productivity point of view. Screw drivers vary widely in design, and some are more suitable than others. Screw drivers come in a number of different styles. There are the solid screw drivers, the ratchet screw drivers, the spiral screw drivers, and the various types of power-driven screw drivers. Even the variation among screw drivers of a given type is tremendous. They vary in size, of course, but in addition they vary in about every other way imaginable. The handles vary in diameter, length, cross section, shape, and nature of gripping surface. Points are wide, narrow, blunt, sharp, taper toward the point like a wedge, or are narrower right above the point than at the point. A lately introduced type has a special point to fit a special screw head which offers many advantages. When all these factors are considered, the choice of the screw driver is important from efficiency or productivity point of view.
There is a screw driver that is better for a given application. For medium work with the conventional screw-head if a solid screw driver is to be used, the one with the largest cylindrical handle which can be comfortably grasped by the operator should be chosen. The handle should, of course, be fluted to prevent slipping. The diameter of the handle will vary with the size of the operator's hand, but two or three standard sizes are sufficient for most hands. The diameter of the handle should be large, because the larger the handle within the limits of the human hand, the more easily can a given torque be applied. To prevent slipping, the point should not be wedge-shaped but should be slightly larger at the point than just above it.
If many screws have to be driven, a ratchet, spiral, or power-driven screw driver can often be used to good advantage. If many screws of the same size are to be driven, a piece of hardened tubing slipped over the end of the screw-driver point will make it much easier to locate the screw driver in the slot.
The same sort of searching analysis can be made for every type of hand tool used. Wrenches, hammers, chisels, saws, scissors, knives, pliers, and drills all come in a great variety of styles. Standardization on a limited number of the better styles within a plant will tend to prevent the use of the more inefficient tools. Tests must be made to determine which styles are actually the most efficient. Time taken for the element is the decision criterion.
Judgment must be used, of course, in determining the amount of time that can economically be spent in analyzing the tools used on any one job. Unless a job is highly repetitive, it will not pay to try to discover the best screw driver for that particular job. Instead, the whole subject of hand tools including screw drivers may be investigated in a general way, and good tools may be adopted for standard use. The tool supply should be plentiful, for it is not uncommon to see operators not only using the wrong size of tool, but also using a chisel for a hammer or a screw driver for a crude chisel merely because the proper tool is not available. An insufficient supply of proper tools may reduce the amount expended for tools, but it will prove costly in the long run.
Setup - Workplace Layout
The order in which tools are set up in a turret lathe, for example, will determine the order in which the various machining operations are performed. The position in which material is placed with respect to the point of use will determine the class and the length of the motions required to secure it.
Before any work can be done, certain preliminary or "make ready" operations must be performed. These include such elements as getting tools and drawings, getting material and instructions, and setting up the machine or laying out material and tools about the workplace. When the operation itself has been completed, certain clean up or "put-away" elements must be done such as putting away tools and drawings, removing finished material, and cleaning up the workplace or machine.
Questions on "Make-ready" and "Put-away" Elements. The procedure followed to perform the
'make-ready' and "putaway" elements may carry the operator away from his workplace and should be questioned closely. In small-quantity lot work, these operations may consume more time than productive operation work. The necessity for trips to other parts of the department should be minimized.
Questions which will lead to suggestions for improvement of "Make-ready" and "Put-away" Elements are:
1. How is the job assigned to the operator (job card or ticket issue to operator)?
2. Is the procedure such that the operator is ever without a job to do (delays in giving job ticket)?
3. How are instructions imparted to the operator?
4. How is material secured?
5. How are drawings and tools secured?
6. How are the times at which the job is started and finished checked?
7. What possibilities for delays occur at drawing room, toolroom, storeroom, or time clerk's office?
8. If operator makes his own setup, would economies be gained by providing special setup men?
9. Could a supply boy get tools, drawings, and material?
10. Is the layout of the operator Js locker or tool drawer orderly so that no time is lost searching for tools or equipment?
11. Are the tools that the operator uses in making his setup adequate?
12. Is the machine set up properly?
13. Is the machine adjusted for proper feeds and speeds?
14. Is machine in repair, and are belts tight and not slipping?
15. If vises, jigs, or fixtures are used, are they securely clamped to the machine?
16. Is the order in which the elements of the operation are performed correct?
17. Does the workplace layout conform to the principles that govern effective workplace layouts?
18. Is material properly positioned?
19. Are tools prepositioned?
20. Are the first few pieces produced checked for correctness by anyone other than the operator?
21. What must be done to complete operation and put away all equipment used?
22. Can trip to return tools to toolroom be combined with trip to get tools for next job?
23. How thoroughly should workplace be cleaned?
24. What disposal is made of scrap, short ends, or defective parts?
25. If operation is performed continuously, are preliminary operations of a preparatory nature necessary the first thing in the morning?
26. Are adjustments to equipment on a continuous operation made by the operator?
27. How is material supply replenished?
28. If a number of miscellaneous jobs are done, can similar jobs be grouped to eliminate certain setup elements?
29. How are partial setups handled?
30. Is the operator responsible for protecting workplace overnight by covering it or locking up valuable material?
It may be seen that an analysis of "make-ready " and "put-away" operations covers a rather wide field. Some are related to operator work also. But they are mentioned here as they form part of set up and make ready the equipment step. Some of the steps are standard for every job; and after it has been thoroughly analyzed for one job and improved as much as possible, it need not be considered so carefully again. Therefore, the subject should receive a thorough analysis at least once, and preferably so that irregularities will not be permitted to creep in and become standard practice more often, say at least every 6 months.
Make Ready - Allocation of Jobs and Giving Instructions
The methods followed in giving out jobs differ widely throughout industry. Some procedure for telling an operator what job he is to work upon next must be provided. In some cases, material to be processed is placed near the work stations of a number of operators. The operators go to the material and themselves select the jobs they wish to do. This procedure has certain serious disadvantages. Some jobs are more desirable from the operator's standpoint than others. They may be easier or lighter or cleaner, some jobs may carry looser rates than others, thus permitting higher earnings for a given expenditure of effort. If the operators are allowed to pick their own jobs, those who have stronger characters or are physically superior are likely to get the best jobs, and the weaker must take what is left. The least desirable jobs will be slighted altogether as long as there is any other work to do, which causes these jobs to lag and become overdue. There is no assurance that the operators will get the jobs for which they are best suited, considering the group as a whole.
Where the group system is used, these difficulties are minimized, but principally because the group leader assumes a function of management and hands out the work to the members of his group. The group knows that sooner or later it will have to handle all jobs sent to it, and so there is less tendency to slight undesirable work. In the interests of good performance as a group, the skilled men will do the more difficult jobs, leaving the easier tasks to the new or less skilled men. In short, the entire
situation is changed; when the group system is used, the selection of jobs may be left to the workers themselves.
Another common procedure is for the foreman to assign jobs. The foreman knows the work, and he knows his men. Therefore, he is in a good position to distribute the work so that it will be performed most effectively. The chief difficulty with this arrangement is that the modern foreman is so loaded
with duties and responsibilities that he often does not have time to plan his work properly. In moments of rush activity, instead of always having several jobs ahead of each operator, he is likely
to assign jobs only when men run out of work. When a man comes to him for a job, he is likely to glance at the available work and assign the first job he sees that he thinks the operator can do. It may not be the one best suited to the operator; perhaps even more important, it may not be the job that fits most important from a delivery standpoint.
With regard to this last point, in order to get work through the shop on schedule, the planning or production department must work closely with the foreman. Usually, chasers or expediters call to the attention of the foreman the job that is required next. If there are only a few rush jobs, the foreman may be able to have them completed as desired. In times of peak activity, however, when the shop is overloaded, all jobs become rush jobs. Each expediter has a long list of jobs to be completed at once.
Considerable pressure is brought to bear upon the foreman to get out this job and that, and he is likely to find himself devoting time to detailed production activities that could better be spent on taking steps to relieve the congestion.
In most up-to-date plants, the foreman is regarded as a very important man. He is called into conferences and meetings and often participates in educational programs. He is, therefore, away from his department at intervals and, if he has the responsibility of giving out jobs, must give out enough work to last until he returns. If he is called away suddenly or is unexpectedly detained, operators will run out of work. Then they either lose considerable time and hence money which creates dissatisfaction, or they help themselves to another job. If this latter practice is countenanced in a time of emergency, there is a danger that it will soon develop into a standard practice. If men get their own
jobs, the foreman is relieved of a certain amount of work and, if he is otherwise overloaded, may tend to allow operators to select their work with increasing frequency, until all the advantages gained by having the foremen hand out work are lost. The decisions with respect to the order in which jobs are to be put through the shop are made by the planning or production department. Since they know in what order jobs are wanted, it would, therefore, appear that a representative of this department should cooperate closely with the foreman in giving out the work. The foreman may specify the men who are to work on each job when the orders first reach his department, and a dispatch clerk may give the work to the assigned men in the order of its importance from a delivery standpoint. This arrangement is followed in a number of plants.In typical dispatching station system under the control of the production department, time tickets for each operation on each job are made out in a central planning department and are marked with the date the operation should be completed. The dispatcher arranges these time tickets in his dispatch board. Each group of machines within the department is assigned a pocket the dispatch board, and each pocket has three subdivisions.
The time tickets are received considerably in advance of the material. They are first filed in a subdivision of the proper machine pockets called the "work ahead " division. The number of tickets in the "work ahead" divisions at any time gives a rough idea of the load on the shop. When material for a given job enters the department, the dispatcher is notified. He then moves the time ticket for the first operation from the "work ahead" division to the "work ready " division. The time tickets in the latter pocket then show the jobs that are actually ready to be worked upon. When an operator completes one job, he goes to the dispatcher's station and turns in the ticket for that job. The dispatcher then gives him another job by taking the time ticket from the "work ready" division and handing it to him. He selects always the ticket marked with the date nearest to the current date and thus gets the work done in the desired order.
When the operator has received notification in one way or another of the job he is to do, he must next secure drawings, tools, and material. The way in which this is done also varies widely. In some cases, the operator must hunt everything for himself. In others, he goes to a tool- or drawing-room window
and waits while an attendant gets what he requires. In still other cases, everything is brought to him, and he does not have to leave his work station. The exact procedure that is followed will depend upon existing conditions; but if it is possible to work out an economical system for furnishing the operator with what he needs at his work station, it is desirable to do so. Besides reducing costs, this procedure increases the amount of time the equipment is utilized and thus increases the productive capacity of the plant. Often a low-rated worker can do the errands of the operators and bring tools, drawings, and materials.
Where the group system is used and no supply boy is available, the group leader commonly gets all necessary supplies and tools. By getting the necessary items for several jobs at one time, he is
able to effect economies.
A conveyer system can be employed and the jobs may be dispatched by the production department in the order wanted, and all material, tools, and drawings can be sent out at the same time on the conveyer. Thus the amount of time spent by the operator in getting ready to make the setup is reduced to a minimum.
The manner in which instructions are furnished with regard to how the job should be done is worthy of careful consideration. In many cases, no instructions at all are given. The operator is supposed to be familiar enough with the work to know how to do it. If not, he may ask the foreman. When no definite instructions are given or when the foreman gives only brief general advice, the method that the operator follows is likely to be one of his own devising which may or may not be effective. The fact that in so many cases different operators follow different methods in doing the same operation may be traced directly to insufficient instruction. To secure effective performance, the best method must first be worked out and then taught.
Some plants employ instructors or demonstrators to perform the teaching function. If these men know the best methods themselves and are good teachers, good results will be secured. Too often, however, the instructor is merely an experienced operator who knows only such methods as he himself used before he was promoted. Even though he was a highly skilled operator, the chances of his knowing and being able to impart a knowledge of the best methods are small, unless he has received additional
training himself in the principles of methods engineering. If he is a machine instructor, he is likely to teach feeds and speeds and the best way to grind tools, mentioning only briefly, if at all, the arrangement of the workplace and the motions that should be used.
Feeds, speeds, and the grinding of tools all are important, of course, but they constitute only part of the method. A lathe operator, for example, was engaged in turning shafts in an engine lathe. Each shaft had to be stamped with a number. The operator would remove a finished shaft from his lathe, turn to a bench, stamp the number, set aside the shaft, pick up another, and return to his machine. The turning required a long cut under power feed. A much better method is as follows: While a cut is being taken, the operator gets the next shaft to be machined; he places it on the machine ways in a convenient position; as soon as the cut is taken, he removes the finished shaft and inserts the other; he starts the cut and then while the machine is running, stamps and lays aside the finished shaft. Thus, the machine runs nearly continuously, and idle time on the part of both the operator and the machine is reduced. Instruction in some manner with regard not only to feeds and speeds but also with
regard to the proper motion sequence would be necessary to correct his difficulty.
Instruction sheets can be used to instruct operators and, under certain conditions, their use is not too costly.
Setup.
The setup of the machine and of any tools, jigs, or fixtures used should be studied in detail. The correctness and the adequacy of the setup should first be considered, followed by a brief review of the methods employed to make it. The correct setup is fixed by the nature of the operation, the nature of the part, the requirements of the job, and the mechanical features of the machine. Sometimes, it is possible to do a job in more than one way, and care should be taken to ascertain
that the best way is being used.
Many ingenious ways are tried to extend the time for doing a job during the course of a time study. Some changes are done in setup like belts may be loosened so that they slip under load, or a carbon steel cutter may be used in place of a higher speed alloy. In one incident of a time study on a milling-machine operation, the operator loosened the bolts slightly that held the vise to the machine table. When the cut was taken, the vise very slowly slid along the surface of the table, and of course, the time for taking the cut was extended. The time-study engineer, checked the feed and length of cut and found a discrepancy between his data and what the cutting time should be. It was difficult to detect at first where the trouble lay, but the vise eventually reached a point where it was noticeably out of position. Then it was reset it properly, and then restudied the job. Therefore industrial engineers have to examine the setuup and described it adequately in the standard process sheet.
When the setup is being made, certain tools are usually required. These should be suitable for the purpose. If each operator must make his own setup, he should be provided with the necessary tools. If only one or two wrenches are furnished to a group of 10 operators, for example, the time lost in hunting the wrenches and in waiting for a chance to use them will usually far offset the cost of additional equipment. If setup men are employed to setup machines ahead of the operators, their setup work is to them fairly repetitive work, because they are performing the same elements day after day. It will therefore be desirable to treat it as such and to furnish the setup men with special-purpose quick-acting tools.
The Workplace Layout.
The improvement of the layout of the workplace of the industrial worker is too often overlooked as
a means for effecting operating economies. The layout of the workplace partly determines the method the operator must follow in doing a given task, and it almost wholly determines the motions he must employ. For this reason, the principles which affect workplace layouts will be discussed briefly.
Two general concepts underlie workplace layouts. The first has to do with the classes of motions that a human being can make. There are five general classes, as follows:
1. Finger motions.
2. Finger and wrist motions.
3. Finger, wrist, and forearm motions.
4. Finger, wrist, forearm, and upper-arm motions.
5. Finger, wrist, forearm, upper-arm, and body motions.
It is usually stated that motions of the lower classes can be made more quickly and with less expenditure of effort than in motions of the higher classes.
The arc which bounds the maximum working area is traced by the fingers when the arm, fully extended, is. pivoted about the shoulder.
The principles of efficient work areas should be applied to all lines of work, for they are universal. It is customary to think of them in connection with bench operations; but they can and should be applied to the arrangement of tools and materials around machines or on work such as molding, forging, and the like, and to the arrangement of levers, hand wheels, and so on, when designing machine-tool equipment.
In work place layout, one of the most glaring faults commonly encountered lies in the arrangement
of containers of raw and finished material. If the placement is left to the operators, a body motion will often be used for getting or laying aside material, because the operator sets the material containers on the floor or the bench or in some other place that is available but not particularly convenient. Industrial engineers can design an arrangement that minimizes motions and fatigue and thus save time and increase productivity.
Put Away. The put-away elements usually consume less time than the make-ready elements. Tools are put away, the setup is torn down, and the workplace is more or less thoroughly cleaned up. Usually, some of the put-away elements can be combined with some of the make-ready elements for the next operation. Tools for one operation, for example, may be returned to the tool room when the tools for the next operation are obtained. The procedure that will prove most economical for the put-away
elements will depend to a large extent upon the manner in which the make-ready elements are performed. Where a number of similar operations are performed on a machine, it is sometimes possible to use 'the same or part of the same setup on two or more jobs. A part that is common to
several assemblies may be ordered separately for each and appear on several different orders. If these orders are grouped, one setup will care for them all. Again, in milling-machine work, for example, it may be possible to use the same cutter for several different jobs. The elements of "get cutter from
toolroom; "place cutter on machine, "remove cutter from machine/ and "return cutter to toolroom" will thus be performed but once for the several jobs.
Where possibilities of this sort exist, provision should be made when setting up the make-ready and put-away routine so that the economies will be made. If the operator does not know what job he is to do next, if he must completely tear down his setup before going for another job, and if neither the foreman nor the dispatcher attempts to group similar jobs, advantage cannot be taken of partial setups. This is wasteful, of course, and every attempt should be made to secure the benefit of partial setups. Whether or not the operator is paid for the complete setup or only for that part which he actually makes depends upon the difficulty in controlling setups and upon whether or not the saving is due to the operator's own initiative. In either case, more time is available for productive work which is a distinct gain.
Advanced Machine Availability
Replacement
Condition of the Machine (Repair & Overhaul Need)
Improvement of the Machine
Accessories
Cutting Tools
Machine Speeds
Setup Procedure
Upkeep of the machine by operator
Power consumption
Breakdowns analysis
Data Generation and Analysis
Advanced Machine Availability
As a part of Machine work study, availability of advanced machines can be ascertained and a study is done to evaluate buying the new advanced machine.
Replacement
Based on repair cost and operating cost, analysis is to be done regarding replacement of the machine by the same
model or by a different
machine.
Condition of the Machine (Repair & Overhaul Need)
As part of machine work study, the condition of the machine is to be evaluated for recommend-ing overhaul if needed.
Whether adequate maintenance is being done or not is investi-
gated
Improvement of the Machine
Industrial engineers have to find if any improvement of machine can increase productivity.
In Toyota improvement of machines is an important activity.
Accessories
Investigate if any machine accessories are available which can increase productivity.
Cutting Tools
Are appropriate cutting
tools used for various
operations?
Cutting tool planning is
required so that tools are available when needed.
Machine Speeds
Machine speed optimization was done by F.W. Taylor.
Many research studies are being done even in the current years.
For each machine, relevant speed analysis has to be done by industrial engineers as part of Machine work study.
Setup Procedure
Setup time reduction is now
an important exercise related
to machines.
For each machine set up redu-ction studies have to be done by industrial engineering
department.
Upkeep of the Machine by Operator
Scientific management of the
machine maintenance recog-
nized the role of operations
persons in machine upkeep.
Industrial engineers have to
assess the present practices
& their effect on productivity.
Power Consumption
Minimizing power consumption is an
important industrial engineering
activity.
Hence power consumption has to be
analysed and measures are taken to
eliminate waste.
Breakdowns Analysis
Breakdown analysis has
to be done to examine
the adequacy of preventive
maintenance and predictive
Maintenance.
Data Generation and Analysis
Information is also a resource.
Industrial engineers have to
assess the adequacy of the information.
They also have to prevent waste.
They have to examine the cost
incurred for data collection.
Industry 4.0
Industry 4.0 is increasing the role of machines and information collection and transmission in production systems.
Hence industrial engineers have to be increase their effort on machine data collection using sensors and the data analysis through edge computing and cloud computing.
Machining time-estimating method for wire electrical discharge machine and control device for wire electrical discharge machine
2015-05-29
Application filed by 株式会社牧野フライス製作所
2015-05-29
Priority to PCT/JP2015/065651
2016-12-08
Publication of WO2016194072A1 https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2016194072A1/en
Industrial Engineering: Theory, Practice & Application: Business and Production Management, Productivity and Capacity Paperback – September 15, 2013
by Jack Greene (Author)
A wide spectrum of tools and techniques exists to manage business cost, output, utilization, cycle time, performance. This objective book explains strategy, benefits and application of tools, and how they fit and reinforce each other Basic IE principles apply widely, to support efficiency and productivity not only in manufacturing but also in the office, lab, maintenance shop, warehouse; service industries, military, medical services, construction.
The 400 plus pages of this book present:
Seven chapters on Industrial Engineering. Theory, practice, application; how it all fits together,
Four chapters on industrial engineering within a broader management structure; labor, materials, overhead, risk management. Eleven chapters on Cost Reduction; Survive, Recover, or Thrive. Basics, management, accounting, cherry pick, beyond cherry picking, do operating practices interfere, value added, motivation.
Thirteen chapters on Work Measurement. What, Why, and How-To. Measurement techniques, incentives, time study, work sampling, construction piece rates, a model plan to establish work measurement, methods checklists, glossary, useful forms.
Twenty seven chapters on Plant layout, facility design, floor planning. Benefits, concepts, work flow and productivity, sequence, relocation, relationships between elements of a layout, master plan, many tools to use, glossary. Sixteen chapters on Facility Relocation, Merger, and Consolidation. A plant instead of or in addition to, is it time to expand? to relocate? Justification, the relocation marketplace, incentives and taxes, site search, confidentiality, sequence. Examples of layouts within different building shapes.
Five chapters on Capacity, Utilization, Constraints. Determine constraints, manage them, optimize capacity.
Four chapters on Lean, or the Toyota Production System (although the author does not claim to be an expert). Lean Manufacturing and its predecessors, Just In Time or Just In Case, What the real Lean experts say, push or pull supply chain. A chapter, Made in (the name of your country here). Good reasons to keep manufacturing near the home market.
For management and for the practitioner, IE Theory, Practice and Application presents what, why, benefits to expect, how to manage and how to practice the discipline; with checklists; and forms. Practical, real-life actions, on the production floor but also from the boardroom, are suggested to support business and production management, productivity and capacity.
IE tools do not all perform the same function. Furthermore, none of these tools is automatically valuable or useful; each has pros and cons as you consider potential cost and benefit in your circumstance. Select those actions that will bring the most benefit to your circumstances and objectives and which can be implemented by your organization. "Most benefit" often refers to cost but not always; targets may in your situation include output volume now or future growth, fast reaction time, customer service, new products, new technology, quality, technical innovation or excellence, market share. IE tools can help attain all of these objectives.
Time Study and its Application to Engineering Manufacture
David M. Smith, B. Sc., Graduate.First Published June 1, 1925 Research Article
https://doi.org/10.1243/PIME_PROC_1925_108_011_02
The author says it has four functions
1. The Securing of Manufacturing Efficiency
2. The Improvement of Design
3. The Reduction of Fatigue
4. The Fixing of Piece Work Prices
Industrial Engineering is System Efficiency Engineering and Human Effort Engineering.
It is an engineering discipline that deals with the design of system efficiency and human effort in all occupations: agricultural, manufacturing and service. The objectives of Industrial Engineering are optimization of productivity of engineering work-systems and occupational comfort, health, safety and income of persons involved. (Narayana Rao)
Industrial engineers redesign engineering products and processes based on measurements during operations to increase productivity and cost effectiveness. Whereas engineers design products and process plans for each product as a synthesis based on customer requirements and designs, industrial engineers do fine adjustments to those designs based on the measurements taken during actual production and also factor price or resource price changes that take place in the market. Industrial engineers try to respond quickly to developments in new technology that are beneficial to the organization. Also they respond quickly to suggestions and problems of operators to improve the process. In every branch of engineering, industrial engineering has utility and industrial engineers are working. It will be ideal, if industrial engineers specialize in various branches of engineering and work in close cooperation with them to improve the products and processes on a continuing basis. Continuous engineering improvement is the function of industrial engineers.
Presentation at 2017 Annual IISE Conference, Pittsburgh, USA
______________
______________
1. Productivity science
Develop a science for each element of a man - machine system's work related to efficiency and productivity. The productivity science developed is the foundation for industrial engineering in productivity engineering and productivity management phases. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pU8CdWfZZdU
Industrial engineering is concerned with redesign of engineering systems with a view to improve their productivity. Industrial engineers analyze productivity of each resource used in engineering systems and redesign as necessary to improve productivity.
It has to be ensured that the increase in productivity due to the use of low-cost materials, processes and increasing speed of machines and men, should not lead to any decrease in quality of the output.
F.W. Taylor is the pioneer of scientific management. He advocated strongly that science in management of work in production shops did not exist and there is an immediate need to develop science for every element of production work. He himself conducted studies and experiments to develop science of machine tool work/effort and human effort. He contributed to the development of science in both the areas. But in the area of human effort, Frank Gilbreth followed Taylor with a more elaborate framework for productivity science of human effort.
F.W. Taylor did the pioneering research study on productivity science of machines for over 30 years. He did it on machine tools. The description Taylor's work on machining is as follow.
Study of Variables that have an Effect on Cutting Speed, Feed and Time of Cutting
The productivity science problem of machine tool can be solved by a careful study of the effect each of the twelve following variable elements has upon the selection of the cutting speed and feed and therefore on the cutting time.
a. The quality of the metal which is to be cut, i. e., its hardness or other qualities which affect the cutting speed;
b. The diameter of the work;
c The depth of the cut, or one-half of the amount by which the forging or casting is being reduced in diameter in turning;
d. The thickness of the shaving, or the thickness of the spiral strip or band of metal which is to be removed by the tool, measured while the metal retains its original density ; not the thickness of the actual shaving, the - metal of which has become partly disintegrated;
e. The elasticity of the work and of the tool;
f. The shape or contour of the cutting edge of the tool, together with its clearance and lip angles;
g. The chemical composition of the steel from which the tool is made, and the heat treatment of the tool ;
h. Whether a heavy stream of water, or other cooling medium, is used on the tool;
j. The duration of the cut, i. e., the time which a tool must last under pressure of the shaving without being reground; '
k. The pressure of the chip or shaving upon the tool;
l. The changes of speed and feed possible in the lathe;
m The pulling and feeding power of the lathe at its various speeds.
The ultimate object of all experiments in this field is to learn how to remove the metal from forgings and castings in the quickest time, and that therefore the art of cutting metals may be briefly defined as the knowledge of how, with the limitations caused by some and the opportunities offered by others of the above twelve variable elements, in each case to remove the metal with the highest appropriate cutting speed.
Before entering upon the details of experiments, it seems necessary to again particularly call attention to the fact that “standard cutting-speed” is the true criterion by which to measure the performance of various variables like tool material, dimensions etc.
To give an illustration of the practical use of "standard cutting-speed." If, for example, we wish to determine which make of tool steel is the best, we should proceed to make from each of the two kinds to be tested a set of from four to eight tools. Each tool should be forged from tool steel, say, 5- inch x 1- inch and about 18 inches long, to exactly the same shape, and after giving the tools made from each type of steel the heat treatment appropriate to its chemical composition, they should all be ground with exactly the same shaped cutting edge and the same clearance and lip angles. One of the sets of eight tools should then be run, one tool after another, each for a period of 20 minutes, and each at a little faster cutting speed than its predecessor, until that cutting speed has been found which will cause the tool to be completely ruined‘ at the end of 20 minutes, with an allowance of a minute or two each side of the 20-minute mark.
Every precaution must be taken throughout these tests to maintain uniform all of the other elements or variables which affect the cutting speed, such as the depth of the cut and the quality of the metal being cut. The rate of the cutting speed must be frequently tested during each 20-minute run to be sure that it is uniform throughout.
Throughout this paper, “the speed at which tools” give out in 20 minutes, as described above, will be, for the sake of brevity, referred to as the “standard speed.” After having found the “standard speed” of the first type of tools, and having verified it by ruining several more of the eight tools at the same speed, we should next determine in a similar manner the exact speed at which the other make of tools will be ruined in 20 minutes; and if, for instance, one of these sets of tools exactly ruins at a cutting speed of 55 feet, while the other make ruins at 50 feet per minute, these “standard speeds," 55 to 50, constitute by far the most important criterion from which to judge the relative economic value of the two steels for a machine shop.
Productivity science related research is being carried on machining processes even now also. Only thing is that it is not being presented as part of productivity science of machines. There is a need to collect all the studies under this heading and summarize these studies and present the current guidelines for maximum productivity of each of the machines.
More Details of Taylor's Experiments on Productivity of Machine Tools and Machining
Machine Work Study - Machines and Tools Related Efficiency/Productivity Analysis
The machines, accessories and tools used to perform the operation needs to analysed logically to identify process improvement opportunities to increase productivity and engineering has to be done to modify the process to use new equipment, accessories, tools and modified equipment, accessories or tools.
_______________
_______________
_______________
________________
What are the question that can be asked and evaluated in machine work study? - Barnes
Based on the questions suggested Barnes:
1. What is the operation?
2. What is the purpose of the operation?
3. What is the transformation of the material required?
4. What is the equipment now used?
5. What are the alternative equipments?
6. What are the cutting tools now used?
7. What are alternative cutting tools?
8. What are the cutting parameters now used?
9. What are the alternative cutting parameters?
10. What should be the best specifications for machine and machine parameters for the minimum cost that does the required material transformation reliably and accurately?
Questions on Machine, Equipment and Tools: The tools and equipment used to perform the the machine operation needs to analysed using appropriate questions. The following is a list of questions that are related to machines and machine related tools, accessories and other inputs that have an effect on productivity.
1. Is the machine tool best suited to the performance of the operation of all tools available in the factory or plant?
1a. Is a better a machine or machine tool available in the market?
2. Would the purchase of a better machine be justified (Replacement analysis - Industrial Engineering Economic Analysis needs to be done)?
3. Work holding: Can the work be held in the machine by other means to better advantage?
4. Should a vise be used?
5. Should a jig be used?
6. Should clamps be used?
7. Is the jig design good from a motion-economy standpoint?
8. Can the part be inserted and removed quickly from the jig?
9. Would quick-acting cam-actuated tightening mechanisms be desirable on vise, jig, or clamps?
10. Can ejectors for automatically removing part when vise or jig is opened be installed?
11. Is chuck of best type for the purpose?
12. Would special jaws be better?
13. Should a multiple fixture be provided?
14. Should duplicate holding means be provided so that one may be loaded while machine is making a cut on a part held in the other?
15. Are the cutters proper?
16. Should high-seed steel or cemented carbide be used?
17. Are tools properly ground?
18. Is the necessary accuracy readily obtainable with tool and fixture equipment available?
10. Are tools pre-positioned ?
20. Are tools best suited to purpose?
21. Will ratchet, spiral, or power-driven tools save time?
22. Are all machines provided with the same tools?
23. Can a special tool be made to improve the operation?
24. If accurate work is necessary, are proper gages or other measuring instruments provided?
25. Are gages or other measuring instruments checked for accuracy from time to time?
Because of the wide variety of tools available for different kinds of work, this list could be extended almost indefinitely with specific questions.
Foundries, forge shops, processing industries, assembly plants, and so on all have different kinds of tools, and different questions might be asked in each case.
The list given above is for machine tool work primarily and will indicate the kind of searching, suggestive questions that should be asked. A special list might well be drawn up by each individual plant to cover the kind of tools that might be advantageously applied upon its own work.
Equipment.—A study of existing equipment may suggest changes and improvements or repairs. Machine operations should be those which combine economy with uniformity of standard quality. Standard times and methods are dependent upon standardization of machines within each class (using the best machines for operations), and the maintenance of normal conditions with respect to their upkeep. (https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2019/07/operation-study-arthur-g-anderson-1928.html)
Tools: For the most part, it may be said that the tools do function properly from the standpoint of the finished job. But from a productivity angle, industrial engineer has to examine the productivity possible from the existing tool and has to compare it with productivity possible from alternative tools to decide the appropriate alternative. Industrial engineers have to receive information regarding new tools from purchase department, representatives of organizations selling tools, consultants and technical literature being procured by the company. Industrial engineers have to monitor technology and engineering developments on a continuous basis and have to set up libraries for their departments or there have to sections within the company library for industrial engineering materials.
Similarly, whether, the jigs and fixtures etc. function properly from a motion-economy standpoint is subject to evaluation by industrial engineers. The tool designer is usually more concerned with making a tool that will do a certain job than he is with the motions that will be required to operate it. Therefore, unless he has made a study of the principles of methods engineering or has had the importance of motion economy impressed upon him in some other way, it is probably safe to say that the motions required to operate the tool are the last thing he thinks of.
As a result, tools are designed and built that require much more time to use than they should. The common machine vise is a good example. The quick-acting vise is far superior. On machining operations where the cutting time is short, it will save 20 to 40 per cent of the total operation time. The jaws of the vise are cam-actuated. They are tightened by moving the two levers in opposite directions which conforms to the principles of motion economy. They hold securely without hammering on the levers. They are adjustable to a variety, of sizes of work. In short, they possess many real advantages over the standard vise.
Suggestions that will improve the quickness of operation of tools should be made to tool designers as they are conceived. If they are presented with a summary of the yearly saving in dollars and cents that they will effect, interest in better tool design from a use-time standpoint will be aroused. This is very desirable, for tool designers as a group are clever arid ingenious, and if the importance of reducing the time required to operate tools Is clearly demonstrated, they will be able to assist materially toward this end by producing more suitable designs.
Hand Tools. Even the hand tools used by operator in connection with machine work have to analyzed as part of machine work study. There is a tendency to pay too little attention to the hand tools used upon even the more repetitive operations. To many, a screw driver is a screw driver, and if it fits the slot in the screw to be driven, it is considered satisfactory. This is far from being the case, however. Screw drivers vary widely in design, and some are more suitable than others. Screw drivers come in a number of different styles. There are the solid screw drivers, the ratchet screw drivers, the spiral screw drivers, and the various types of power-driven screw drivers. Even the variation among screw drivers of a given type is tremendous. They vary in size, of course, but in addition they vary in about every other way imaginable. The handles vary in diameter, length, cross section, shape, and nature of gripping surface. Points are wide, narrow, blunt, sharp, taper toward the point like a wedge, or are narrower right above the point than at the point. A lately introduced type has a special point to fit a special screwhead which offers many advantages.
When all these factors are considered, the wide variation in even such a simple tool as a screw driver becomes apparent.
There is, of course, one screw driver that is better for a given application than any other. For medium work with the conventional screw-head if a solid screw driver is to be used, the one with the largest cylindrical handle which can be comfortably grasped by the operator should be chosen. The handle should, of course, be fluted to prevent slipping. The diameter of the handle will vary with the size of the operator's hand, but two or three standard sizes are sufficient for most hands. The diameter of the handle should be large, because the larger the handle within the limits of the human hand, the more easily can a given torque be applied. To prevent slipping, the point should not be wedge-shaped but should be slightly larger at the point than just above it. Few screw drivers commonly encountered in industry meet these simple specifications.
If many screws have to be driven, a ratchet, spiral, or power-driven screw driver can often be used to good advantage. If many screws of the same size are to be driven, a piece of hardened tubing slipped over the end of the screw-driver point will make it much easier to locate the screw driver in the slot.
The same sort of searching analysis can be made for every type of hand tool used. Wrenches, hammers, chisels, saws, scissors, knives, pliers, and drills all come in a great variety of styles. Standardization on a limited number of the better styles within a plant will tend to prevent the use of the more inefficient tools. Tests must be made to determine which styles are actually the most efficient. Time taken for the element is the decision criterion.
Judgment must be used, of course, in determining the amount of time that can economically be spent in analyzing the tools used on any one job. Unless a job is highly repetitive, it will not pay to try to discover the best screw driver for that particular job. Instead, the whole subject of hand tools including screw drivers may be investigated in a general way, and good tools may be adopted for standard use. The tool supply should be plentiful, for it is not uncommon to see operators not only using the wrong size of tool, but also using a chisel for a hammer or a screw driver for a crude chisel merely because the proper tool is not available. An insufficient supply of proper tools may reduce the amount expended for tools, but it will prove costly in the long run.
Information Payoff: The Transformation of Work in the Electronic Age
Paul A. Strassmann
Strassmann, Inc., 1985 - Office practice - 298 pages
Focusing on how electronic technology is changing the methods of the workplace, this book examines the changes from the perspectives of the individual, the organization and society as it explores ways to increase productivity, encourage economic growth, and improve life in the workplace. https://books.google.co.in/books/about/Information_Payoff.html?id=a94RqsnuXKwC
American executives spend too much money on computer systems that allow them to do the wrong things faster - Information Strategist Paul Strassmann https://www.inc.com/magazine/19880301/3102.html
The Business Value of Computers: An Executive's Guide
Paul A. Strassmann
Information Economics Press, 1990 - Business & Economics - 530 pages
The book addresses the practical needs of executives responsible for planning, budgeting & justifying information technology expenditures. Written by the former chief information executive (1956-1978) & vice president of strategic planning (1978-1985), author of the widely acclaimed & translated INFORMATION PAYOFF - THE TRANSFORMATION OF WORK IN THE ELECTRONIC AGE (Free Press, 1985), lecturer & university professor. Reviews: "A New Bible for Management Information Systems. An eminently readable book made more so by a playful sense of humor" -Information Week-; "Strips away obfuscation that has concealed the real value of computers." (The Financial Post); "A true path to the Holy Grail of business value." (Computer Weekly); "Some surprising answers to familiar questions cast new light on investing profitably in computer hardware & software." (The Conference Board); "All those either transfixed or baffled by the powers & potential of computers would do well to heed Strassmann's advice." (Daily Telegraph); "Measuring managerial productivity is the key to knowing how to invest in information technology. Strassmann's new book sets out the results of his research in detail. His argument comes through clearly." (The Financial Times). https://books.google.co.in/books/about/The_Business_Value_of_Computers.html?id=4JFYNybuNmYC
Updated on 15 November 2019, 9 November 2018, 14 September 2012
Professor Omid Nohadani's paper "Robust Optimization with Time-Dependent Uncertainty in Radiation Therapy" 1st place best paper for the IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering.
2017
“Nondestructive Quality Assessment of 3D-Biofabricated Constructs using Dielectric Impedance Spectroscopy”
Lokesh Karthik Narayana, Rohan Shirwaiker and Binil Starly.
2016
Jabil Singapore was presented the first place prize for their project, “Lean Culture Transformation – Next Level” which involved re-deploying a site-wide Lean culture which led to cost savings and customer satisfaction.
“Functional Approach Laboratory Co., Ltd.” does not think that it should be better now. We provide services for the future in 30 years.
Because we want our future to be a good society, a society where there are good companies, good products and services, and a good life, we make an effort now.
1916 Year Book
BULLETIN OF THE Society for the
Promotion of Engineering Education
Vol. VI Lancaster, Pa., March, 1916 No. 7
Benedict, H. G., Industrial Engineer, Detroit, Mich 1913
Diemer, Hugo, Professor of Industrial Engineering, Pennsylvania
State College, State College, Pa 1902
GiLBRETH, F. B., President, F. B. Gilbreth, Inc., 77 Brown St.,
Providence, E. 1 1911
Tabob, Wii. H., Instructor in Industrial Engineering, Pennsylvania
Thomson, E. D., Efficiency Engineer, General Electric Company,
TowLE, W. M., Professor of Industrial Engineering, Clarkson
Indian Members
Iter, E. P., Supervisor, Public Works Department, Teruverambur
P. O., Trechwofoltz District, Deccan, India 1910
Naidu, a. S., Assistant Engineer, Vizianagram City, Vizagapatam
District, Madras, India 1913
SWAMY, B. N., Overseer, Public Works Vizianagram City Bldga.,
Madras, South India 1913 - Indian
Work measurement professionals have to focus on machine time estimation also. Also, they have to focus on developing productivity science based on measurements that they are taking. My comment in work measurement Linkedin group.
In the case of turning the formula for machine time is
T = [L+A]/[frN]
Where T = machining time in minutes
L = length of the workpiece
A = an allowance for tool approach and exit, normally 2 to 5 mm
fr = feed rate (mm per revolution of the workpiece)
N = revolutions of the workpiece in rev per minute
The gas plant is one of the world’s largest gas processing plants. It was commissioned in 1981 as part of Saudi Aramco’s Master Gas System to process associated gas from oil wells. The facility is the latest example of Saudi Aramco’s application of Advanced Analytics and Artificial Intelligence solutions to increase productivity while enhancing safety, reliability and efficiency of its operating facilities.
The use of drones and wearable technologies to inspect pipelines and machinery has helped cut inspection time by 90% in this industrial facility.
