Thursday, May 29, 2025

Industrial Engineering 5.0 - IE 5.0 - IE in Industry 5.0 - Human Effort Industrial Engineering

 




Update on 29.5.2024

A search for the key word "Industrial engineering 5.0" did not reveal any document.

So still developments in Industry 5.0 are only available as online documents. Any development on the topic "Industrial engineering 5.0" has to initially track developments in industry 5.0


Positioning Industrial Engineering in the Era of Industry 4.0, 5.0, and Beyond: Pathways to Innovation and Sustainability


45 Pages Posted: 23 Jan 2025 Last revised: 16 Jan 2025

Ocident Bongomin

Moi University; Africa Centre of Excellence II in Phytochemical, Textile and Renewable Energy (ACE II-PTRE); Ain Shams University; National Crops Resources Research Institute; Ndejje University; Pabplek Advanced Simulation and Modeling Solutions


Date Written: January 14, 2025


Abstract

Industrial Engineering (IE) has continually evolved to optimize systems and processes, addressing the demands of an ever-changing industrial landscape. From its historical roots in work organization to its current role in Industry 4.0 and the emerging Industry 5.0 paradigm, IE has remained central to fostering innovation, efficiency, and sustainability.  Industry 5.0 shifts the focus to human-centric, ethical, and sustainable practices, leveraging advanced technologies such as cognitive digital twins, collaborative robots, and resilient systems to enhance human-machine collaboration and environmental responsibility. This  highlights strategies for advancing the IE profession and academic programs, ensuring their relevance in the digital era. Additionally, it identifies six future research directions, including Human-AI collaboration, Adaptive and resilient systems design, advanced sustainability models, ethical and inclusive systems design, digital twin integration, and quantum computing, as key enablers for driving innovation and achieving global sustainability goals. By bridging the technological advancements of Industry 4.0 with the human-centric and sustainable objectives of Industry 5.0, IE is positioned to lead the transformation of industrial systems, fostering a resilient, inclusive, and sustainable future.



Open Access
Pillars of the Industry 5.0 Used in Industrial Engineering
Florin-Daniel Edutanu, Mariana Ciorap  and Dragos-Florin Chitariu  
Nov 21, 2024
Bulletin of the Polytechnic Institute of Iași. Machine constructions Section
VOLUME 70 (2024): ISSUE 1 (MARCH 2024)

This paper examines the perspective through the lens of the three principles proposed by I5.0: human-centric, sustainability and resilience, which outline these new manufacturing technologies used to improve production processes in most fields, including industrial engineering. The pillars of the I5.0 concept identified in this paper will describe the amplification of this digital transformation and the more meaningful and effective collaboration between humans and machines and systems in their digital ecosystem.  These pillars underpin a new industrial revolution and define a new level of organisation and control over the future entire product life cycle value chain.


--------------------------

Pub. 29.4.2023

Update on 29.5.2025,  24.1.2024

Less than one hundred Scopus-indexed articles mention the 5th industrial revolution (5IR) in their titles or abstracts starting from 2016. Also, many works can be found in Google Scholar. So, what is the difference between the 4th and the 5th industrial revolutions?


Rundle (2017) describes the 5IR as being faster, more scalable, and affecting more people through the nature of the technology at their disposal than previous ones. The European Economic and Social Committee (2018) describes the 5IR as "…focused on combining human beings' creativity and craftsmanship with the speed, productivity and consistency of robots" (EESC, 2018).


The Fifth Industrial Revolution, 5IR, is the idea of people and machines working together harmoniously, emphasizing the well-being of multiple stakeholders ― society, businesses, workers and customers. It thus paves the way for an (r)evolution in thinking about and harnessing human-machine collaboration for greater societal well-being (Noble, 2022).




The European Economic and Social Committee (2018) describes the 5IR as "…focused on combining human beings' creativity and craftsmanship with the speed, productivity and consistency of robots" (EESC, 2018).

We can see one focus of IE 5.0 "combining human beings' creativity and craftsmanship with the speed, productivity and consistency of robots". This is the human effort industrial engineering focus in IE 5.0. In IE 4.0 the focus is on understanding connected machines, devices and using them in processes to increase productivity.

Blog Book - Industrial Engineering 4.0 - IE in the Era of Industry 4.0

IE 4.0: IoT Adoption, Improvement, Maturity, Productivity, Innovation and Connected Products



What is Industry 5.0?
European industry is a key driver in the economic and societal transitions that we are currently undergoing.

In order to remain the engine of prosperity, industry must lead the digital and green transitions.

This approach provides a vison of industry that aims beyond efficiency and productivity as the sole goals, and reinforces the role and the contribution of industry to society.

It places the wellbeing of the worker at the centre of the production process and uses new technologies to provide prosperity beyond jobs and growth while respecting the production limits of the planet.

It complements the existing "Industry 4.0" approach by specifically putting research and innovation at the service of the transition to a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry.

Why Industry 5.0?
Industries can play an active role in providing solutions to challenges for society including the preservation of resources, climate change and social stability. 

The Industry of the Future approach brings benefits for industry, for workers and for society.

It empowers workers, as well as addresses the evolving skills and training needs of employees. It increases the competitiveness of industry and helps attract the best talents.

It is good for our planet as it favours circular production models and support technologies that make the use of natural resources more efficient.

Revising existing value chains and energy consumption practices can also make industries more resilient against external shocks, such as Covid-19 crisis.

How to make it happen?
This approach to industry contributes to 3 of the Commission’s priorities: "An economy that works for people", "European Green Deal" and "Europe fit for the digital age".

Elements related to the future of industry are already part of major Commission policy initiatives

adopting a human-centric approach for digital technologies including artificial intelligence (Proposal for AI regulation)
up-skilling and re-skilling European workers, particularly digital skills (Skills Agenda and Digital Education Action plan)
modern, resource-efficient and sustainable industries and transition to a circular economy (Green Deal)
a globally competitive and world-leading industry, speeding up investment in research and innovation (Industrial Strategy)
These are just some examples that demonstrate the strong links between the industrial transition and other societal developments.

Experts from research and technology organisations as well as funding agencies discussed the Industry 5.0 concept during 2 virtual workshops on 2 and 9 July 2020.

ESIR a high-level expert group advising the Commission on how to develop a forward-looking and transformative research and innovation policy, are currently developing a new policy brief on industry. It will provide concrete policy recommendations and actions for attaining Industry of the Future goals and will provide an important basis for advancing European and national-level policy initiatives and making sure the development is in line with the Commission's political priorities.




2 November 2023

INDUSTRY 5.0 GLOBAL OUTLOOK 2024 - 2025

Michael Rada

874 views  Premiered on 3 Nov 2023
Recorded on
 November 2, 2023
The growing number of companies, businesses organizations, and governments referring to INDUSTRY 5.0 and calling it "THE FUTURE STRATEGY results in the need to prepare and share the outline of INDUSTRY 5.0 global development for the next two years.
I hope it will help you to understand and to see your role in the global transformative journey that turns the EARTH from a global landfill to BLUE MARBLE again
If any questions, feel free to ask and please do not hesitate to contact me, the best way is on LINKEDIN which from the very beginning serves as the main communication platform and tool. Here is my profile  

 / michaelrada  


Article to be developed.


A FRAMEWORK FOR DESIGNING WORK SYSTEMS IN 
INDUSTRY 4.0.
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING DESIGN, ICED19 
5-8 AUGUST 2019, DELFT, THE NETHERLANDS 
ICED19. 


Exploring the status of the human operator in Industry 4.0: A systematic review.
Liliana Cunha, Daniel Silva and Sarah Maggioli. 
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Psychol., 20 September 2022
Sec. Organizational Psychology
Volume 13 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.889129










Ud. 25.1.2024,  16.1.2024, 7.5.2023
Pub. 29.4.2023

Taiichi Ohno on Industrial Engineering - Toyota Style Industrial Engineering






TPS is Industrial Engineering System of Toyota Motors.

 Taiichi Ohno on Industrial Engineering 





Taiichi Ohno in Toyota Production System: Beyond Large Scale Production,

Advocating Profit-Making Industrial Engineering  



After World War II, the United States influenced Japan greatly in many ways.

Aggressive Japanese businesses imported and adopted America's high-level production and manufacturing technology. In academia and business, a great number of American business management techniques were also studied and discussed. For example, Japanese businesses carefully studied industrial engineering (IE), a company-wide manufacturing technology directly tied to management that was developed and applied in the United States.

Defining industrial engineering seems to be fairly difficult. When first introduced, it was pointed out that the Toyota production system was method engineering (ME), not IE. Don't be confused over the meanings.

To me, IE is not a partial production technology but rather a total manufacturing technology reaching the whole business organization. In other words, IE is a system and the Toyota production system may be regarded as Toyota style IE.

What is the difference between traditional IE and the Toyota system? In brief, Toyota style IE is mekeru or profitmaking IE, known as MIE. 

Unless IE results in cost reductions and profit increases, I think it is meaningless.

There are various definitions of IE. A former head of the American Steel Workers' Union defined its function as that of entering a plant to improve methods and procedures and to reduce costs. And this is exactly so.

"IE is the use of techniques and systems to improve the method of manufacturing. In scope it: ranges from work simplification to large-scale capital investment plans."'

"IE has two meanings. One aims at improving work methods in the plant or in a particular work activity. The other one means the specialized study of time and action. However, this is the work of a technician. Essentially, an industrial engineer studies systematic approaches to improvements. "

I would like to add a definition from the Society for Advancement of Management (SAM), an organization that succeeded the Taylor Society:

Industrial engineering applies engineering knowledge and techniques for the study, improvement, planning, and iniplementation of the following:

1. method and system,
2. qualitative and quantitative planning and various standards including the various procedures in the organization of work,
3. measuring actual results under the standards and taking suitable actions.

This is all done to exercise better management with special consideration for employee welfare, and it does not restrict business to lowering the cost of improved products and services.'

I have listed various IE definitions, each saying good things, because they are useful references. However, in private business, implementing IE effectively is not easy.

The reason I call Toyota's industrial engineering profitmaking IE is my wish that the Toyota production system born and raised at Toyota Motor Company be comparable or superior to the American IE's business management and manufacturing system.

We are very happy that the Toyota production system has become, as I intended, a company-wide manufacturing technology directly tied to management. And, fortunately, it is extending to the outside cooperating firms as well.



Quotes from Above.


Japanese businesses carefully studied industrial engineering (IE), a company-wide manufacturing technology directly tied to management that was developed and applied in the United States.


When first introduced, it was pointed out that the Toyota production system was method engineering (ME), not IE.


TPS is Industrial Engineering System of Toyota Motors.

IE is a system and the Toyota production system may be regarded as Toyota style IE.


Toyota style IE is mekeru or profitmaking IE, known as MIE. 
Unless IE results in cost reductions and profit increases, I think it is meaningless.


Essentially, an industrial engineer studies systematic approaches to improvements.


It is my wish that the Toyota production system born and raised at Toyota Motor Company be comparable or superior to the American IE's business management and manufacturing system.


Industrial engineering (IE), a company-wide manufacturing technology directly tied to management that was developed and applied in the United States.

We are very happy that the Toyota production system has become, as I intended, a company-wide manufacturing technology directly tied to management.



------------------------

Taiichi Ohno repeats what Taylor said. Improve every element of an operation/process.


Improve machining processes,  install autonomous systems, improve tools,  rearrange machines,  improve  transportation methods. Examine available resources and  the materials at hand for manufacturing. optimize their use.

Prevent the recurrence of defective products, operational mistakes, and accidents, and by incorporate  workers' ideas."  


Toyota Industrial Engineering that is Ohno's Industrial Engineering is improving every element of the process and reducing every delay, defect and machine breakdown (Naryana Rao)


Toyota style Industrial Engineering - Ohno


"We have eliminated waste by examining available resources, rearranging machines, improving machining processes, installing autonomous systems, improving tools, analyzing transportation methods and optimizing the materials at hand for manufacturing. High production efficiency has also been maintained by preventing the recurrence of defective products, operational mistakes, and accidents, and by incorporating workers' ideas." Taiichi Ohno (P. 21)

Source: Taiichi Ohno, Toyota Production System: Beyond Large Scale Production, pp. 21-22.


------------------------

Japanese businesses carefully studied industrial engineering (IE), a company wide manufacturing technology improvement discipline that is directly tied to management.

The success of Toyota in cost reduction, productivity improvement, and international competitiveness and its celebrated Toyota Production System, fulfilled the dream of Yoichi Ueno (that Japan can guide US in improved practices of efficiency improvement). The success of #Toyota and the World Class #TPS was  built on the sustained efforts many Japanese persons who understood Taylor and Gilbreth's writings and improvised them in implementing them in Japanese companies.


Summarized from Taiichi Ohno's Book - Toyota Production System: Beyond Large Scale Production,

IE is not a partial technology improvement discipline but it is a total manufacturing technology improvement discipline reaching the whole organization. Toyota production system utilizes Toyota-style IE.


                    Jun. 17, 2020. Toyota Launches New Model Harrier in Japan                       

What is Toyota style Industrial Engineering?


Toyota style industrial engineering is mokeru or profit-making industrial engineerng (MIE). Unless IE results in cost reductions and profit increases, I (Taiichi Ohno) think it is meaningless.

A former head of the American Steel Workers' Union defined IE's function as that of entering a plant to improve methods and procedures and to reduce costs.

"IE is the use of techniques and systems to improve the method of manufacturing. In scope it ranges from work simplifications to large-scale capital investment plans"

IE aims at improving work methods in the plant or in a particular work activity. An industrial engineer studies systematic approaches to improvements.

Definition of IE according to Society for Advancement of Management (Successor to Taylor Society)


Industrial engineering applies engineering knowledge and techniques for the study, improvement, planning and implementation of the following:

1. Method and system
2. Qualitative and quantitative planning and various standards including the various procedures in the organization of work.
3. Measuring actual results under the standards and taking suitable actions.

This is all done to exercise better management with special consideration for employee welfare, and it does not restrict business to lowering the cost of improved products and services.

Ohno said he included various definitions as each is good description. But he indicated that implementing IE effectively is not easy.

Ohno made a wish that IE as used in Toyota will be superior to the IE used in American Business.

Toyota style Industrial Engineering - Ohno


"We have eliminated waste by examining available resources, rearranging machines, improving machining processes, installing autonomous systems, improving tools, analyzing transportation methods and optimizing the materials at hand for manufacturing. High production efficiency has also been maintained by preventing the recurrence of defective products, operational mistakes, and accidents, and by incorporating workers' ideas." Taiichi Ohno (P. 21)

Source: Taiichi Ohno, Toyota Production System: Beyond Large Scale Production, pp. 71-72.

Japanese Leaders in Efficiency - Productivity Movement - Industrial Engineering.
#IndustrialEngineering #Productivity #CostReduction  #Japanese


Yoichi Ueno - Japanese Leader in Efficiency - Productivity Movement

Rear Admiral Takuo Godo - Productivity Promoter in Japan


Shigeo Shingo - The Japanese Industrial Engineer - Contribution to Industrial Engineering

Taiichi Ohno on Industrial Engineering - Toyota Style Industrial Engineering


Takeshi Kawase - Industrial Engineering - Definition. IE  deals  with the efficiency of systems that include humans.






Updated on 28.5.2025,  10.7.2024, 26 June 2020, 12 November 2013









Taylor's - Gilbreth's Industrial Engineering in New Framework - Narayana Rao

Case Study 42 - Seco Jetstream Tooling - Benefit - Case Study

Taylor's Industrial Engineering in New Framework - Narayana Rao



Industrial Engineering - Definition
Principles of Industrial Engineering
Functions of Industrial Engineering - Productivity Science - Productivity Engineering - Productivity Management.
Focus Areas of Industrial Engineering
Machine Work Study
Toyota Style Industrial Engineering
Industrial Engineering 4.0
Industrial Engineering 5.0

INTRODUCTION TO MODERN INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING  

Pdf File. Free Download.
by Narayana Rao Kvss.

Industrial Engineering - Definition


Industrial Engineering is System Efficiency Engineering.
It includes Machine Effort and Human Effort Industrial Engineering.

Industrial Engineering is concerned with efficiency design or productivity design during initial product or process design and productivity improvement on a continuous basis during the life of the product and process. Industrial engineers participate in the installation of processes and process improvement projects and take full responsibility to make their designs or design modifications actual implementations and results generators.

Engineers and design and produce.

Value Creation for the Organization by Industrial Engineers


Industrial engineering learners have to understand the potential for value creation by them in the companies. The compensation or income received is always related to the value created by a professional. Hence for industrial engineering students as well as professionals, understanding value creation potential is extremely important. A model is presented in this essay on value creation (2020). 

Value Creation for the Organization by Industrial Engineers - Productivity Engineering Potential
Lesson 13. Industrial Engineering ONLINE Course 



Principles of Industrial Engineering


Taylor - Narayana Rao Principles of Industrial Engineering
http://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2017/06/taylor-narayana-rao-principles-of.html


21. Cost measurement

Taylor - Narayana Rao Principles of Industrial Engineering Video Presentation

_______________



_______________

Functions of Industrial Engineering

Productivity Science - Productivity Engineering - Productivity Management

_______________

_______________

Focus Areas of Industrial Engineering


_______________

_______________

Functions and Focus Areas of Industrial Engineering
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2017/07/functions-of-industrial-engineering.html


Focus Areas of Industrial Engineering

Productivity Science

Facilities Industrial Engineering

Product Industrial Engineering

Process Industrial Engineering

Industrial Engineering Optimization

Industrial Engineering Statistics

Industrial Engineering Economics

Human Effort Industrial Engineering

Productivity Measurement

Productivity Management

Industrial Engineering  Knowledge Management and Other Information Systems (New)

Applied Industrial Engineering

Important Focus Areas of Industrial Engineering

Facilities Industrial Engineering
Product Industrial Engineering
Process Industrial Engineering
Human Effort Industrial Engineering


Product Industrial Engineering


______________

______________


Process Industrial Engineering


______________

_______________


Human Effort Industrial Engineering

MAYNARD's HUMAN EFFORT INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING - Methods Time Measurement (MTM) - Introduction  
Lesson 34 - Industrial Engineering ONLINE Course

_______________

_______________

Machine Work Study

H.B. Maynard - MACHINE EFFORT INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING - Operation Analysis - Machine Work Study
Lesson  33. - Industrial Engineering ONLINE Course 

_______________

_______________


_______________

_______________

Industrial Engineering 4.0

11 July 2021
VERY HAPPY. Blog Book accessed 1000 times. 
Industrial Engineering 4.0 - IE in the Era of Industry 4.0 - Blog Book by K.V.S.S. Narayana Rao

_______________


_______________
_______________

_______________

Taylor's Industrial Engineering and Productivity Improvement Described by Taylor  in His Papers

Notes on Belting, Piece Rate System, Shop Management, Art of Metal Cutting, Scientific Management
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2019/06/taylors-industrial-engineering.html


Updated on 12.7.2023, 12 July 2022,  12 July 2021,  4 August 2019, 6 July 2019

Wednesday, May 28, 2025

TPS - Toyota Industrial Engineering - The Story

TPS is Industrial Engineering System of Toyota Motors.


IE is a system and the Toyota production system may be regarded as Toyota style IE.

Taiichi Ohno on Industrial Engineering - Toyota Style Industrial Engineering

https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2013/11/taiichi-ohno-on-industrial-engineering.html

 





The success of Toyota in cost reduction, productivity improvement, and international competitiveness and its celebrated Toyota Production System, fulfilled the dream of Yoichi Ueno (that Japan can guide US in improved practices of efficiency improvement). The success of #Toyota and the World Class #TPS was  built on the sustained efforts many Japanese persons who understood Taylor and Gilbreth's writings and improvised them in implementing them in Japanese companies.



TPS - the ancestors

Sakichi Toyoda - Toyoda Loom Works -  invented an automatic power loom, Jikoda (autonomous automation), 5 Whys

Kiichiro Toyoda - dreamed of branching into automobiles, started in 1933.
Frustrated by difficulties in engine casting, begins process study.
1936 - creates Kaizen improvement teams
Resigned 1948 due to poor sales.

Department of War TWI program -
1950 - Deming visits Japan. at request of Japanese Union of Scientists and Engineers, June-August 1950, trains 100s of engineers, managers and scholars in statistical process control and quality.

JUSE - > Genichi Taguchi - consults with Toyota

In 1957 cousin Eiji Toyoda takes over. Visits Ford. Implements Ford mass production standards.

Frederick Taylor's PSM -> Shigeo Shingo

Toyota Production System

Many folks may think that Japan achieved market dominance through robots, or being workaholics. Not so.

Taiichii Ohno - graduated from Nagoya Technical High School, joined Toyota in 1943 -
Shigeo Shingo - late 50s to 60s - consulting with Toyota
Eiji Toyoda..
Started in 1948 - based on work of Deming

muri - inconsistency
mura - overburden
muda - waste

design out mura - be able to meet required results smoothly - Tai Chi
decrease muri - increase flexibility without stress - Yoga
eliminate muda - eliminate waste - Shaolin Kung-Fu
Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to remove. - Saint-Exupery

Unable to eliminate bottlenecks in production
EOQ - Economic Lot Size - calculation of best use of line, production must be high enough to meet demand for different models

different model = different parts, different dies, different procedures, different tools

high downtime for line changeover = high economic lot size
high economic lot size = high stock  of parts inventory
high stock of inventory = investment of $$$, land costs in Japan are expensive, high cost for big warranty
lesser diversity of models

First - rework factory and models to make use of standard parts, tools, and processes.

Next goal is SMED
biggest component of changeover is die exchange
examine process -
die weighs many tons
use crane to remove old and install new
requires minute measurement to put into place
done by hand and by eye
tested by making test stampings, wasting time and resources
process took 12 hours to 3 days

improve
invest in precision measurement devices
record necessary measurements for each die
install according to measurements rather than by hand and eye - changeover to 90 minutes

FRS - fixed repeating schedule
die changes in standard sequence
scheduling tool changeovers as the new product moved through factory
scheduling use of cranes

SMED achieved
Single Minute Exchange of Die
<10 minutes to change die.
EOQ = 1 vehicle.
Just in time manufacturing

intangible benefits
stockless production
reduction of process footprint = free floor space
productivity increased
ability to changeover more
elimination of defects
improved quality of each product
improved quality from
increased safety due to simpler setup
simplified housekeeping
lower expense of setup
operator preferred = better worker satisfaction
lower skill requirements
elimination of waste
goods are not lost due to deterioration in inventory
new attitudes on work process among staff

Source:
TPS by Ken Harris
http://knol.google.com/ k/ken-harris/tps/ 6p1yn013rxws/2

Posted under creative commons 3.0 attribution license




Full List of Articles on Kaizen

Kaizen eno Yon Dankai - Improvement in 4 Steps - History of Kaizen in Japan

Rules for Successful Kaizen Management


Kaizen - Engaging Front-Line Staff in Continuous Improvements - Industrial Engineering

Leading and Managing Kaizen Events

Agile Kaizen

Kaizen - The Japanese Style Productivity Improvement Methodology

Industrial Engineering is Kaizen in Engineering

Kobetsu Kaizen - Focused Improvement of Machine and Machine Work in TPM

Front Line Kaizen for Product and Process Industrial Engineering


Gadget-based improvement is widespread as improvement activities that can not only eliminate losses but also inspire the workplace.

Karakuri Kaizen - Introduction

Industrial Engineering is Kaizen Engineering

Toyota Kaizen Methods: Six Steps to Improvement - 2010 - Book Information

Kaizens - Production Improvement Ideas Implemented - India - Kaizen Eye

Kaizen Assembly: Designing, Constructing, and Managing a Lean Assembly Line - Book Information

Kaikaku: The Power and Magic of Lean : a Study in Knowledge Transfer - 2004 - Norman Bodek - Book Information

Kaizen Costing and Kaizen Cost Management







Pub. 20.3.2012   Ud. 12.11.2024

Course End Summary - Part 1 - IEKC IE Online Course - Productivity Science and Productivity Engineering


Sharing of the IEKC IE Online Course in social media for the year 2025-26 (Sixth  year of circulation) will start from 1 June 2025.

Index Page of the Course: https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2020/05/industrial-engineering-online-course.html




Modules

The course's first module is introduction to industrial engineering. It starts with history of industrial engineering.

The second module describes the fundamental IE concepts initiated by Taylor, Gilbreth, Emerson, Gantt. In the second generation industrial engineers the contribution of Maynard and Barnes are highlighted. Then we have Japanese contributions. The contribution of Shigeo Shingo is specially included.

The developments in industrial engineering since 1880 were formulated into a discipline of engineering in 1908 by Prof. Diemer. The developments up to 2017 were summarized as principles of engineering by Narayana Rao and were presented in the IISE Annual Conference at Pittsburgh. The paper is part of the proceedings of the conference.

_______________________


_______________________

The third module takes the principle of productivity science forward.

The following modules are the discussion of the principle of productivity engineering, the primary engineering activity or the primary activity of industrial engineering.





Productivity Science and Productivity Engineering - Important Points


1. Cost reduction to be done by engineers along with other engineering innovations - ASME President said in 1880.

2. F.W. Taylor, made comments in ASME Annual meetings.

3. F.W. Taylor presented paper discussing cost aspects of belt transmission practices and gave his suggestions for minimizing costs associated with belt transmission systems.

4. F.W. Taylor presented a paper outlining a system to increase productivity of machine - man combination (A department to study time taken by machines and men and minimize the time taken was advocated. Time study. This department became industrial engineering department).

4a. The need for an engineer who understands cost aspects of engineering decisions was outlined. Such an engineer was called as industrial engineer or production engineer. (Harvard Business School faculty member 1901)

5. F.W. Taylor presented "Shop Management."

6. Machine effort related industrial engineering was explored in a research report reporting research over 26 year period by F.W. Taylor.

7. Productivity Science of Human Effort was proposed by Frank Gilbreth (Motion Study).

8. Industrial engineering course was started in Penn State College by Prof. Diemer in 1908.

9. Principles of Scientific Management was published by F.W. Taylor. Productivity science, Productivity Engineering, and Productivity Management was proposed in these principles (1911).

10. C.B. Going authors the book, Principles of Industrial Engineering in 1911.

11. Prof. Diemer authored a book and described industrial engineering.

12. Time study according to Taylor is breaking a task (process and operation) into elements and examining every feature and its relation to time taken to complete the element. Taylor advocated study of number of operators doing the same element to identify the method of doing the element in minimum time. Thus a best practice is identified and based on this and other observation, development of productivity science of the element has to be developed. Time measurement is involved, but more important is understanding the relation between various features and time taken.

An operation has to be improved by selection of elements each taking minimum time (combination of best practice elements.)

13. Motion study is to be done by recording motions of each hand of the operator (Gilbreth). Workmen use different motions when they want to do fast work.  Even Gilbreth advocates study of multiple operators to identify the fastest motions giving quality work. Gilbreth recognized time measurement to identify the fastest methods of doing work.

14. Process Chart was proposed by Gilbreths in 1921 to record the process in terms of operations or tasks of different categories.

15. Maynard and Stegmerten described the preparation of operation sheet and analyzing it in detail to improve or simplify operations in process chart.

Therefore we can see the role of element improvement, operation improvement and process improvement in total improvement of processes.

16. A factory has many processes being used parallely. Production of each part is a process. Factory facilities are to be selected to maximize efficiency of processes. Processes have to take less time and cost less.  

17. H.B. Maynard developed a popular predetermined human motion measurement system (MTM).

18. Based on observations of motions, Gilbreth developed principles of motion economy - part of productivity science of human effort. Prof. Barnes did number of experimental studies on these principles.

19. The engineering done by industrial engineers to increase productivity can be categorized into three important areas.  Facilities Industrial Engineering, Product Industrial Engineering, and Process Industrial Engineering

Facilities Industrial Engineering  - Facilities selection evaluation, Facilities improvement, Facilites Layout

20. The main methods of product industrial engineering are value analysis & value engineering and design for machining & assembly. Value analysis identifies opportunities for value improvement. Value engineering develops the concepts for improvement and does the detailed engineering to implement the concept.

21. Process industrial engineering uses process charts to describe the process (say process of producing a part) comprehensively in terms of operations. The operations included in the process are termed as operation (material processing or transformation), inspection, transport, storage and temporary delays. Industrial engineers have to improve each of the operations in terms of improving its elements to increase productivity and reduce cost.

22. Process level analysis is termed ECRS method. E stands for examining the effectiveness of operation in contributing to the completion of the process. If the output of the operation is not satisfactory to the customer, it has to be modified first to make it effective. Only effective operations have to examined for increasing efficiency without affecting effectiveness. Effectiveness first, efficiency next is to be a principle of industrial engineering. E also represents eliminate. If the operation is redundant or can be eliminated by changes in any other operation, it can be totally removed from  the process. The possibility of such an occurrence has to be investigated.

C represents combining two operations in sequence. This is reducing of division of labor in the process. Similarly even the possibility of splitting an operation further and doing it on two different machines or work stations can also be examined. This is increasing division of labor.

R represent rearrangement of operations. The sequence of operations is changed to get productivity advantage.

S stands for simplification or improvement of the operation. For doing it operation analysis needs to be done.

23. Operation Analysis and Operation Improvement

In a process, 5 types of operations are identified. Material processing, inspection, transport, storage and delay. Operations occur in processes. For each operation included in the process, a detailed operation detail sheet has to be prepared for analyzing the operation and improving it. Analyzing the operation involves evaluation of engineering and managerial elements. Industrial engineers need to have full knowledge of the elements related to the processes under their management. Then only they can identify waste and improvement opportunities based on the questions raised in the analysis.

24. Material Processing Operations

Machines, material, men and many other consumable materials, energy and information are used in material processing operations.  In manufacturing, it is engineering that drives this operation. Industrial engineers need to have full knowledge of basic production processes or methods, various machines and accessories, cutting tools and other consumable used. The core elemental activities involved are information transfer, setting up the machine, loading the work piece, machining or machine activity, and unloading the work piece, and operator inspection of the incoming material, in-process work piece and finished work piece.

25. Inspection Operations

Normally in a process chart practice, the inspection carried out by a specially designated inspector is included as this operation. To improve inspection operations, the IE has to know in detail the measuring instruments and measuring processes.

26.




To do productivity engineering of processes, Industrial engineers have to learn new technology as it appears.
-------------------------


About AI - A new technology.

Moving Beyond Islands of Experimentation to AI Everywhere
The agile teams needed to kick-start artificial intelligence must give way to companywide structures in order to scale the technology across a business. - Amit Joshi, Ivy Buche, and Miguel Paredes Sadler


Raj Sanne
Lean Manufacturing Engineer/Industrial Engineer/Continuous Improvement Engineering.

Comment.
Narayana Rao KVSS
Professor (Retired), NITIE, Mumbai - Offering FREE IE ONLINE Course Notes

Company has to make the technology available and train persons. In the case of industrial engineering, it is industrial engineers who have to evaluate and implement AI in each element of the processes as appropriate and rational. No doubt process designers have to implement AI in each of the processes. The AI technology team has to train process designers and industrial engineers in engineering



Industrial Engineering - Video Talks - Play List

2024 - 25  The online course lessons were shared in social media during 1 June 2024 to May 2025.






Ud. 28.5.2025, 21.5.2023,5.5.2023,  30.5.2022,  5.5.2022

Pub: 2.5.2022


Industrial Engineering in Japan - Achievements - News Items

TPS is Industrial Engineering System of Toyota Motors.


IE is a system and the Toyota production system may be regarded as Toyota style IE.

Taiichi Ohno on Industrial Engineering - Toyota Style Industrial Engineering

https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2013/11/taiichi-ohno-on-industrial-engineering.html

 




2023
https://www.kao.com/global/en/newsroom/news/release/2023/20230314-001/

2015
https://www.hitachiastemo.com/en/news/20150723en.html

2014
https://us.misumi-ec.com/blog/misumi-group-inc-receives-the-award-for-innovations-to-manufacturing-processes-from-jma/

2012

Kou Kimura, currently MD of the Chennai (India) plant, will return to Japan to take up a senior position within NML’s Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering Division.
http://automotivehorizon.sulekha.com/takayuki-ishida-succeeds-timonobu-tokuyama-as-md-of_newsitem_4199

https://www.toyota-boshoku.com/asia/news/topics/detail.php?id=2058


2011


Japan Management Association (JMA; Chairman: Norio Yamaguchi) has founded the GOOD
FACTORY AWARDs to commend Japanese companies’ factories for achieving results in their
kaizen activities, such as raising productivity and improving quality in manufacturing.
The first award winners were the following five companies: Aizu Olympus Co., Ltd.; Toshiba
Information Equipment (Philippines) Inc.; Toyota Motor Asia Pacific Eng. & Mfg./Toyota Motor
Thailand; Fuji Xerox of Shenzhen Ltd.; and PT. Yamaha Music Manufacturing Asia.
(For an outline of the GOOD FACTORY AWARDs, see p. 2.)

Olympus Corporation is pleased to announce that Aizu Olympus Co., Ltd. (Aizu Olympus) has won the Good Factory Award presented by the Japan Management Association (JMA). Aizu Olympus, the Medical Business Group of Olympus, is primarily involved in the manufacture of medical endoscopes.

Introduced in 2011, these prestigious awards will be presented each year to factories that are regarded as having set an example of excellence for manufacturing in Japan. The judges will examine various examples of organizational innovation initiatives at factories in Japan and throughout Asia, including productivity and quality improvements. The wide-ranging selection criteria include processes, success factors, workplace know-how, improvements in workers' awareness, and social contribution.

There are four Good Factory Award categories. The award won by Olympus is the Monodzukuri Process Innovation Award, which is presented to a factory that has comprehensively enhanced and strengthened manufacturing processes in its factories and business sites through initiatives in such areas as industrial engineering (IE)*1 improvement, information technology (IT), quality assurance, process improvement, supply chain management (SCM)*2 improvement, just-in-time (JIT)*3 production, procurement innovation, logistics innovation and automation.

Terminology
*1 Industrial engineering (IE) is a general field of engineering encompassing the design, implementation, administration and improvement of systems to ensure the effective utilization of production resources, including human resources, facilities and information.
*2 Supply chain management (SCM) is a management method targeted toward the improvement of management efficiency through the integrated management of flows of goods from the procurement of materials through to later stages, including production, distribution and retailing.
*3 Just in time (JIT) production involves the production of the products needed by customers, in the quantities required, and at the times required.


August 2004

Nissan ‘Strike Zone’ Improves Ergonomic Practices
Nissan is getting down to the nitty gritty of improving its already industry-leading efficiency, says Hidetoshi Imazu, Nissan’s senior vice president-Manufacturing & Industrial Engineering.

That includes a new measure of worker ergonomic perfection Nissan has dubbed the “strike zone,” which Imazu says is a precisely defined body-movement area where a worker most efficiently can complete a given task with the least amount of strain.

Imazu says his company’s manufacturing engineers now are attempting to have every assembly line task performed in the strike zone, which not only eases effort but, ultimately, aids efficiency.

The strike-zone concept is proving particularly helpful in Japan, whose workforce is aging,
http://wardsauto.com/news-amp-analysis/nissan-strike-zone-improves-ergonomic-practices



1932

Jikan kenkyū ni yoru sagyō hyōjun ketteihō /
[by Stewart M. Lowry, Harold B. Maynard and G. J. Stegemerten]; Katō Takeo, Noda Nobuo yaku oyobi chū.

時間研究による作業標準決定法

Main Author: Lowry, Stewart McKinley, 1896-
Related Names: Noda, Nobuo., Katō, Takeo., Stegemerten, Gustave James 1892-, Maynard, Harold Bright 1902-
Language(s): Japanese
Published: Tokyo : Manejimento Sha Chosabu, 1932.
Subjects: Motion study.Time study.Industrial efficiency.
Note: Translation of : Ch.1-35, Time and motion study and formulas for wage incentives. New York, 1927.
Physical Description: vii, 371 p. : 24 cm.





Full List of Articles on Kaizen

Kaizen eno Yon Dankai - Improvement in 4 Steps - History of Kaizen in Japan

Rules for Successful Kaizen Management


Kaizen - Engaging Front-Line Staff in Continuous Improvements - Industrial Engineering

Leading and Managing Kaizen Events

Agile Kaizen

Kaizen - The Japanese Style Productivity Improvement Methodology

Industrial Engineering is Kaizen in Engineering

Kobetsu Kaizen - Focused Improvement of Machine and Machine Work in TPM

Front Line Kaizen for Product and Process Industrial Engineering


Gadget-based improvement is widespread as improvement activities that can not only eliminate losses but also inspire the workplace.

Karakuri Kaizen - Introduction

Industrial Engineering is Kaizen Engineering

Toyota Kaizen Methods: Six Steps to Improvement - 2010 - Book Information

Kaizens - Production Improvement Ideas Implemented - India - Kaizen Eye

Kaizen Assembly: Designing, Constructing, and Managing a Lean Assembly Line - Book Information

Kaikaku: The Power and Magic of Lean : a Study in Knowledge Transfer - 2004 - Norman Bodek - Book Information

Kaizen Costing and Kaizen Cost Management









Ud. 12.11.2024
Pub. 1.12.2013




Toyota Style Industrial Engineering - American Industrial Engineering - Difference

TPS is Industrial Engineering System of Toyota Motors.


IE is a system and the Toyota production system may be regarded as Toyota style IE.

Taiichi Ohno on Industrial Engineering - Toyota Style Industrial Engineering

https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2013/11/taiichi-ohno-on-industrial-engineering.html

 





Toyota Style Industrial Engineering has focus on efficiency and waste elimination from manufacturing processes. They use all techniques advocated by pioneers to achieve their objective with some significant improvements.


Value analysis and engineering
Process Analysis
Operation Analysis
Motion Analysis
Work measurement
 Layout Improvement


 New Techniques - Shiegeo Shingo

SMED
Poka-yoke

Mathematical optimization
Operations Research
Statistics

New ideas - Reduce total costs associated with inventory - setup, inventory carrying cost and shortage cost.
Develop machines with more intelligence.
Involve operators and supervisors in improvement activities apart from industrial engineers and managers.
Strong belief,  commitment and effort for continuous improvement.





Ud. 28.5.2025
Pub. 24.12.2013

Tuesday, May 27, 2025

Toyota Production System - Beyond Large Scale Production - Origin and Development - Taiichi Ohno's Book Information

The success of Toyota in cost reduction, productivity improvement, and international competitiveness and its celebrated Toyota Production System, fulfilled the dream of Yoichi Ueno (that Japan can guide US in improved practices of efficiency improvement). The success of #Toyota and the World Class #TPS was  built on the sustained efforts many Japanese persons who understood Taylor and Gilbreth's writings and improvised them in implementing them in Japanese companies.





Toyota Production System - 2015 Reading by KVSS Narayana Rao

1. Paper by Sugimori in 1977 in IJPR

Mutagenization of Toyota Production System: The Story of Hyundai Motor Company
Byoung-Hoon Lee†, Hyung-Je Jo‡
† Department of Sociology, Chung-Ang University, 221 Heuksuk-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 156-751, South Korea.
‡ Department of Sociology, Ulsan University

The Contradictions That Drive Toyota’s Success
Hirotaka Takeuchi, Emi Osono, and Norihiko Shimizu
FROM HBR, THE JUNE 2008 ISSUE
Hirotaka Takeuchi (htakeuchi@hbs.edu) is a professor at Harvard Business School. They are the authors of The Knowledge-Creating Company (Oxford, 1995).
Emi Osono (osono@ics.hit-u.ac.jp) is an associate professor;
and Norihiko Shimizu (nshimizu@ics.hit-u.ac.jp) is a visiting professor at Hitotsubashi University’s Graduate School of International Corporate Strategy in Tokyo. 
This article is adapted from their book Extreme Toyota: Radical Contradictions That Drive Success at the World’s Best Manufacturer, John Wiley & Sons.


____________________________________________________________


Summary of What Taiichi Ohno Shared in His Book


I. Starting From Need


During the 15-year period beginning in 1959-1960, Japan experienced unusually rapid economic growth. As a result, mass production, American style, was still used effectively in many areas.

We kept reminding ourselves, however, that careless imitation of the American system could be dangerous. Making many models in small numbers cheaply -wasn't this some thing we could develop? And we kept thinking that a Japanese production system like this might even surpass the conventional mass production system. Thus, the principal objective of the Toyota production system was to
produce many models in small quantities.

"Catch Up With America" Toyoda Kiichiro (1894-1952)


15 August 1945 . Japan lost the war. Toyoda Kiichiro, President of theToyota Motor Company said, "Catch up with America in three years. Otherwise, the automobile industry of Japan will not survive"


Just-In-Time


The basis of the Toyota production system is the absolute elimination of waste. The two pillars needed to support the system are:

Just in time
Autonomation - Intelligent machine that does not produce defect and also stops on it own. Also intelligent operator that do not produce defective parts and investigate and remove the root cause whenever a defective part is produced.

Just in time system eliminates one of the seven wastes specified by Ohno. In an assembly flow process, the right parts needed reach the appropriate place at the time they are needed, inventories can be reduced drastically even up to zero. But to reach the JIT ideal, many existing conventional management methods have to be changed.

Using a Common-Sense Idea

The common sense idea is making only those components demanded or used by the downstream process.

Ohno said, I am fond of thinking about a problem over and over.  The normal planning and production process is for the component producer to produce as per plan and keep it inventory for the assembly department to draw when needed. But Ohno changed this method. Assembly department will go and take what they want and component department has to replenish that component only. So component department has no independent plan. Only assembly department has the plan. Every link in the production flow process or chain is connected with this method and synchronized. With this practice, the management work force is reduced drastically. This information system is given the name kanban.

Give the Machine Intelligence


At Toyota,  machines automated along with an automatic stopping device in case of a problem
 are utilized. In this way, human intelligence is given to machines. The machine stops in case of a problem and the management will come to know of it. Expanding the rule, even operators are asked to stop the flow, if there is a problem. Rapid counter measures are taken to prevent recurrence of a problem.

The Power of Individual Skill and Teamwork


A champion team must have good teamwork and people with individual skill. Likewise autonomation is individual machine skill and JIT is teamwork.

Cost Reduction is the Goal


Frequently we use the word "efficiency" when talking about production, management, and business. "Efficiency" means cost reduction. At Toyota, profit can be obtained only by reducing costs.  We cannot set prices based on our costs.  Consumer sets the price and if the manufacturer sets a higher price due to his high manufacturing cost, the consumer will simply turn away. Cost reduction has to be the goal of manufacturers. The management has to develop human resources ability to its fullest capacity to best enhance creativity, and fruitfulness, to utilize facilities and machines well, and to eliminate all waste.

The Illusion of Japanese Industry


Japanese industry believed in mass production. Till 1973 oil crisis, Japanese manufacturers had the illusion that this system fits their needs


Establishing a Production Flow


Establishing production flow in machine shop was difficult. But in 1947, Ohno arranged machines in a flow order and tried having one worker operate three or four machines (different machines). Even though working time did not go up, operators did not like the new system. Also Ohno wrote, that many adjustments that an operator has to make to machine created difficulties for the operators.  Hence, Ohno said he became patient to implement the system even though he was convinced that the direction was right.

Production Leveling


We got the idea that we should spread production evenly throughout the workday.  We wanted to get away from having to produce everything around the end of the month.

In the Beginning There was Need.


The key to progress in production improvement, I feel, is letting the plant people feel the need.
Opportunities to take care of the needs are always there. Once a need if felt, we just have to drive ourselves to find the practical opportunities that satisfy the needs.

A Revolution in Consciousness Is Indispensable


A person in business may feel uneasy about survival in this competitive society without keeping some inventories of raw materials, work-in-progress, and products. But Ohno says a revolution in consciousness is needed to realize that overproduction and the consequent inventory is a waste that has to be eliminated rather than accumulated.

2. Evolution of the Toyota Production System


Repeating Why Five Times


By asking why five times and answering it each time, we can get to the real cause of the problem, which is often behind behind more visible symptoms.

May be we can interpret it as  prevention - appraisal - failure model. We see failure. We need to know ways to prevent the event very early in the event sequence.

Complete Analysis of Wastes


Improving efficiency makes sense only when it is tied to cost reduction. The efficiency of each operator has to be improved, each production line has to be improved and efficiency of the entire plant has to be improved due to them.

       Waste of overproduction
       Waste of time on hand (waiting)
       Waste in transportation
       Waste in processing itself
       Waste of stock on hand (inventory)
       Waste of Movement
       Waste of making defective products

Ohno made the statement that eliminating these seven wastes completely can improve the operating efficiency by a large margin. To eliminate these wastes, we must make only the quantity needed, thereby releasing extra manpower. Management has to identify excess manpower and utilize it effectively in other activities. Eliminating wasteful and meaningless jobs and creating useful jobs enhances the value of work for workers.


My Plant-First Principle


A proper work procedure cannot be written from a desk. It must be tried and revised many times in the production plant. Production managers have to be in the plant which is a major source of information.

Writing the Standard Work Sheet Yourself


Standard work sheet is basis for all improvements in Toyota production system. Improving machining processes, improving tools, improving transportation processes, and optimizing the inventory, rearranging machines, all such things are implemented through standard work sheets only. The job of the field supervisor, section chief or group foreman is to train workers in standard work. The trainer must actually take the hand of the worker and teach them. Workers of a team also help their team members.

Teamwork is Everything


Team work is essential in manufacturing also like many of the sports. Assigning responsibility to individuals is not sufficient. Teamwork is essential.

The Skill of Passing the Baton
The work area is like track relay. There is a wide area in which baton can be passed.
       Mutual Assistance Campaign

An Idea from the U.S. Supermarket


The communication system of Toyota is Kanban and Ohno got the idea for it from watching the transactions in Supermarkets of USA. At supermarkets buyers buy what they need.  Supermarkets have to facilitate it.

The idea of supermarket was implemented in Toyota and to avoid a situation wherein large quantity of a component is demanded suddenly, production leveling was also introduced.

What is Kanban?


         Kanban is a method for communicating production and use related messages among the plant personnel. Its most frequently used form is a piece of paper contained in a rectangular vinyl envelope. It contains 1. pickup information 2. transfer information and production information.  The kanban method is used for information flow vertically and laterally within Toyota itself and between Toyota and its supply partners.

Kanban is autonomic nerve of the production line.

(The word Kanban literally means visible record).

Incorrect Use of Kanban Causes Problems


Incorrect use of Kanban system causes problems. Close supervision of the kanban rules is required to derive best results from it.

1. An assembly process (more generally later process) can pick up items only in the quantity specified in the kanban from the earlier process. So the quantity the assembly process can pick up at a time is specified in the kanban system.
2. Earlier processes produce items in the quantity specified in the kanban which is provided by the later process after withdrawing the item from stocks of earlier process.
3. No items are withdrawn or transported or produced without a kanban indicating it.
4. All items have to move with an attached kanban.
5. Defective items cannot be sent ahead from any processing station. The assembly line can be stopped if there are no defect-free components or assembly in process. But a defective item cannot move forward.
6. Reducing the batch quantities indicated in the Kanban would make the system more sensitive and makes the system more synchronized.



The Talent and Courage to Rethink What We Call Common Sense


Productivity improvement ideas may come but implementing them requires understanding by top management. The ideas when they defy the present conventional thinking or common sense, requires much more understanding the by the top management and the greater the commitment of top management, the more successful will be the implementation.

Ohno wrote that he came up with many revolutionary ideas and implemented them. They were sometimes regarded as high handed. But Toyota's top management watched the situation quietly and allowed Ohno to implement them.

In 1963 only JIT was extended to outside suppliers. Till that only internal production was handled on JIT basis.

Establishing the Flow is the Basic Condition


Toyota helped its suppliers or cooperating firms to set up flow systems first. Then Kanban system was introduced.

Kanban is the communication tool for implementing or realizing JIT. This tool works well when all the supporting processes are flow processes. So flow process is a basic condition for realizing JIT through Kanban communication system.  The other important conditions are levelled production (eliminating surprise withdrawals of components) and working using standard work methods

Use Your Authority to Encourage Them,


Ohno said his ideas were not understood and hence not used initially by many. But he applied them in his department and when he was given more departments to manage, or was shifted to other departments, he implemented them there also, till Kanban became a company wide practice.

Mountains Should be Low and Valleys Should be Shallow


There must be efforts to level the production during the year. The mountains should be low and valleys should be shallow as much as possible and sales department has to strive for more uniform sales.

Challenge to Production Leveling


TPS works for production leveling during the year, the month and even a day. If 250 sedans, 125 hardtops, and 125 wagons are made daily, in assembly there are done in the sequence One sedan, one hard top, one sedan and then wagon etc. That gives a lot size of one. But lot size of one was not achieved overnight in various shops. In a die-press, in 1940 changing the die took to two or three hours. With such a die changing time, one cannot make small lots. So a decision was taken to make efforts to decrease the die changing times. During 1950s, the die change time went down to one hour. Then it was further reduced to 15 minutes. By late 1960s, the die changing time was drastically reduced to 3 minutes.

The challenge to production leveling and small lots was high set up times. The need for quick die changes was generated or identified and steps were taken to understand the issue and develop a solution.  This problem was not attempted earlier. To do this, initial solutions were developed and the workers were trained. But subsequently, the enthusiasm spread and everybody chipped in with suggestions and method improved beyond the initial description. The system became the product of the effort of large number of people.

Product Leveling and Market Diversification


Ohno emphasized that production leveling (small batch quantity) is much more advantageous than the planned mass production system (larger batch quantity) in responding to the diverse demands especially of the automobile market.

Product leveling or small batches is more advantageous to respond to the market diversification. But still, leveling becomes more difficult as diversification develops. Toyota copes up with this problem well enough and keeps market diversification and production leveling in harmony.  In this endeavor, it is important to avoid the use of dedicated facilities and equipment and also equipment that has very general utility. It is important to put in effort and develop specialized, and yet versatile production processes through use of machines and jigs that can handle minimal quantities (Lot sizes of one). It is difficult but we must utilize all available knowledge to avoid undermining the benefits of mass production.

Kanban Accelerates Improvements

Carrying Carts as Kanban

The Elastic Nature of Kanban


3. Further Development


An Autonomic Nervous System in the Business Organization


Ohno says that human body has autonomic nerves that work as instant reflux to certain external stimuli and motor nerves that work under the command of the brain.

Similar to that in TPS, worker make some decisions without the involvement of production control or engineering departments. Production control and engineering departments are the brain of the organization.

In TPS workers stop the plant when problem occurs, decide the sequence to follow in making parts and also decide when overtime is necessary. They need not involve brain in reacting to some small changes in plans.

Provide Necessary Information When Needed


Computers should not be bought and used indiscriminately. It should not lead to higher costs. Processing customer orders and information on market needs and wants by computers can be very effective. But  kanban communication system is more effective in production communication.

The Toyota Style Information System


Toyota does production planning like other companies.  It has an annual plan, say for instance making 2 million cars in the year.  Next, there is a monthly plan, announced a month ahead. Based on the monthly plan daily production schedule is established and this is based on production leveling. Each production line is informed of the daily production quantity. But the daily sequence schedule (sequence of models and color) is sent to only one place - the final assembly line.

The production order for a specific car is issued to the process 1 of the assembly line. This production order will have all the information needed for its production and the workers in the following assembly  processes can tell which parts to use by at the car this  production order attached to car. Workers in the subprocesses can know what to do as soon as they see the car in assembly at the first stage. If needed they are sent the information directly.  Toyota makes sure the right information reaches the operators at the right time by letting the products being produced carry the information needed to assemble them.

Fine Adjustment


To cope with a constantly fluctuating market, the production line must be able to respond to schedule changes.  One day, the line may make four Car A's and six Car B's. But on another day, the ratio might turn out be the reverse - six car A's and four car B's. Such reversed ratios are followed the production line as per the information carried by the Kanban

Coping with Changes

Fine adjustment also means that mistakes are corrected immediately.

What Is True Economy?


True economy is tied directly to the survival of business. In Toyota production system, economy or efficiency is thought in terms of manpower reduction and cost reduction for making one car. Manpower reduction is a means for cost reduction, which the most critical condition for the growth of the business and its survival. The criterion for all decision making in Toyota is cost reduction.

Many improvement ideas are to be generated and each idea has to be thorougly investigated. The cost of improvement should not be more than the cost reduction. Unless, the judgment is made carefully, cost increasing improvements may be undertaken.

At Toyota, we still use many old machines, by maintaining them properly and daily, improving work methods and making layout changes. A layout must make worker activities easy and should not impede production flow.

Re-Examining the Wrongs of Waste


TPS is a method to thoroughly eliminate waste and enhance productivity. Waste refers to all activities of production that increase cost but not add any value (No increase in price takes place due to them). For example, excess people, inventory, and equipment.

The primary waste of excess people, inventory and equipment give rise to secondary wastes.  Complete understanding of waste is essential to implement TPS successfully.

Generate  Excess Capacity


If excess capacity is there, we can use it for various purposes. At Toyota, through continuous improvement, we create excess capacity first and then use it profitably.

The Significance of Understanding


Ohno emphasize the importance of thoroughly understanding production and improvement of production methods and organization and the process of manpower reduction and cost reduction.

Understanding needs an approach to examine an objective positively and comprehend its nature. Careful inspection of a production area reveals waste and scope for improvement.  Only a very close observation reveals waste and work. There are work movements which are not processing, and there are processing activities which are a waste. Manpower reduction means raising the ratio value added processing activities to 100 percent of the working time.

Utilizing the Full Work System


All sources of waste have to be detected and crushed. Waste of overproduction is eliminated in TPS by strictly adhering to standard inventory. If the standard inventory is specified as 5, on a day when it becomes 3 only 2 are produced. On a day when it becomes 4 only one is produced. We call it a full work system, when all standard inventories are replenished in a day. We do not want any overproduction in a day.

Tact Time

(Do Not Make a False Show)

Tact is the length of time, in minutes and seconds, allowed by the customer demand to make one piece of the product. Tact is obtained by dividing the operable time per day (of the machine) by the required number of pieces per day.  Operable rate in TPS refers to the time machine is available for production in a day. The ideal operable rate is 100 per cent. To achieve this, maintenance has to be regular to prevent breakdowns and setup times are to be reduced. Operating rate refers to the production per day.

At Toyota, improvements increase the production quantity per day from a group of workers. But, if excess production is not required as per demand, the number of workers are reduced from the team and only required production is made. Unnecessarily producing excess is no efficiency.

Required Numbers Are All-Important


For each production line, numbers or quantity required by the market is important. In Toyota, we do not produce extra above the required quantity in any line. The excess manpower is transferred to other lines where needed. The required number is adhered to in a disciplined way.

The Tortoise and the Hare


At Toyota we produce according to the needs of the market at slow or fast rate everyday. It is the way of tortoise. We do not run very fast some days and then take rest on other days like a hare.

Take Good Care of Old Equipment


Ohno says, the expertise of a worker increases overtime. But in case of machine, the depreciation of the machines is the popular idea. If machines are poorly maintained and driven close to death, enormous costs are incurred in replacement.  Ohno says, with adequate maintenance, machines will have a longer life.

Look Straight at the Reality

When estimating future business, Ohno recommends that one must be realistic and be ready for instant declines in business.

0.1 Worker is Still One Worker


The savings that come from automation should result in saving a full worker. Then only automation will give cost reduction. Ohno says at the design stage of the production system itself, fewer workers are to be employed. One should not employ more workers initially and then remove them when not needed.

Ohno, in this point also stresses that, they form teams of workers and do not allow only one worker to work in isolation.

Management by Ninjutsu

Management by Ninjutsu means acquiring management skills by training.

In an Art Form, Action is Required
An engineer is an artist. Art requires action not speaking.

Profit Making Industrial Engineering at Toyota


Advocating Profit-Making Industrial Engineering

Surviving the Slow-Growth Economy

4. Genealogy of the Toyota Production System


This chapter gives many passages from the thoughts and sayings of Toyota Sakichi and Toyoda Kiichiro.

Toyoda Kiichiro once told Toyoda Eiji that the best way to work in an automobile assembly plant would to have all parts for assembly at side of the line just in time for their use. The words "just-in-time" attracted many managers of Toyota and Ohno was also attracted by those words.

Taiichi Ohno had experience of cost reduction at Toyota Spinning and Weaving also. The company was implementing cost reduction measures  to catch up and surpass  Lancashire and Yorkshire companies. Toyoda Sakichi had world class view. Toyoda Kiichiro also had world class view. In the two pillars of TPS, autonomation came from Toyoda Sakichi and JIT came from Toyoda Kiichiro.

Toyoda Sakichi said that he observed a grand mother hand weaving for a full day and developed interest in developing a machine for it. Ohno likes that idea of observing on the shop floor to understand things. He wrote "Stand on the shop floor all day and watch - you will eventually discover what has to be done."

Toyoda Kiichiro visisted America and he must have thought about how surpass America's highly developed automobile production system and utter the idea of JIT.

Toyoda Sakichi talked of inventions made by Japanese efforts, knowledge and intellect.He made 100 inventions with patents.







A Global World Around Us



Two Extraordinary Characters

Learning from the Unyielding Spirit

I believe just-in-time was Toyoda Kiichiro's dying wish  - Ohno

Toyotaism with a Scientific and Rational Nature

Provide Good Equipment Even If the Factory Is Simple

Pursuity of a Japanese-Style Production Technique

Making Products That Have Value

Toyoda Kiichiro recognized that the market always demands reasonably priced products.  He wrote "We know our cars will not sell unless they are cheaper than foreign models. "We might manage to sell 50 to 100 cars per month by appealing to patriotism. But selling 200 or 500 cars per month would be difficult. In the end, prices must be competitive."

Can we actually produce economical cars domestically? Cars with proper materials and proper quality?

A Chess Player's View

In Search of Something Japanese

Witnessing a Dialectic Evolution

Toyoda Kiichiro  " we shall learn production techniques from the American method of mass production. But we will not copy it as is. We shall use our own research and creativity to develop a production method that suits our own country's situation."

I believe this was the origin of Toyoda Kiichiro's idea of just-in-time.

5. The True Intention of the Ford System


The Ford System and the Toyota System


Ohno acknowledges - Henry Ford without dispute created the automobile production system. Toyota system uses the flow system developed by Ford. But the difference is that at Ford they were concerned about warehousing the parts and moving the chassis past the warehouse. Toyota eliminated the warehouse.

Small Lot Sizes and Quick Setup


The American automobile business has continuously shown that planned mass production has the greatest effect on cost reduction. The Toyota system takes the reverse course. The slogan is "small lot sizes and quick setups." Toyota system works on the premise of totally eliminating the overproduction generated by inventory and costs related to workers, land, and facilitates needed for managing inventory.

Toyota system works on the premise of totally eliminating the overproduction generated by inventory and costs related to workers, land, and facilities needed for managing inventory.

Rapid changeovers are an absolute requirement for the Toyota Production System. Teaching workers to reduce lot sizes and setup times took repeated on-the-job training.

The Foresight of Henry Ford


Ford said what we do have to bother about is the waste of human labor.  Material in our factory represented labor. When we are wasting material we are wasting labor of some body. We will use material more carefully if we think of it as labour.  Our studies and investigations up to date have resulted in the saving of 80,000,000 pounds of steel a year and this amounts to about 3 million dollars a year.


Standard are Something to Set Up Yourself



Prevention Is Better than Healing


Toyota's strength does not come from its healing processes - it comes from preventive maintenance.

Is There a Ford after Ford?


Ohno said "I think the TPS can be applied in America where the market for many types in large quantities is there."

Toyota has learned a lot from the Ford system.

Inverse Conception and Business Spirit


Is cotton the best material we can use here?  (in seats) As an answer to this question Ford came up with flax and methods to handle it mechanically. Ohno said, "I was intrigued by Ford's question. Is cotton the best material we can use here?"  As Ford pointed out, people follow tradition. This might be acceptable in private life, but in industry, outdated customs must be eliminated. This process of aking why represents Ford's business spirit.  Ohno said reading Ford shows many such brilliant inverse conceptions.

Getting Away from Quantity and Speed

Is efficiency in production systems wrecking all the finer things in life?

Efficiency is merely doing the work in the best way you know rather than in the worst way. It is the taking of a trunk up a hill on a truck rather than on one's back. It is training of the worker and the giving to him of power so that he may earn more and have more and live more comfortably.

6. Surviving the Low-Growth Period


The System Raised in the High-Growth Period

Raising Productivity during Low Growth

Learning from the Flexibility of Ancient People

Important Terms Used to Describe Toyota Production System


Andon

Autonomation

Baka-Yoke

Baton Passing Zone

Do NOt Mkae Isolated Islands

Five Why's

Just-in-Time

Kanban

Labor Saving to Worker Saving to Reducing Number of Workers

Moving vs. Working

Multi-Process Operation System

Operating Rate and Operable Rate

Production Leveling

Profit-Making Industrial Engineering

Real Cause

Required Numbers Equal Production Quantity

Small Lot Sizes and Quick Setups

Standard Work Procedures

Stopping the Line

Tact Time

Toyota Production System

Visual Control (Management by Sight)

Waste Recognition and Elimination

Work Flow and Work Forced to Flow


Work Improvement vs. Equipment Improvement
Work productivity improvement is productivity improvement using the existing equipment. Only tools, jigs and fixtures are introduced as required in work productivity improvement.
If equipment improvement comes first, manufacturing processes will never be improved.



Shigeo Shingo -  Study of Toyota Production System from Industrial Engineering Point of View." - Summary


Shigeo Shingo, the famous industrial engineer from Japan, taught training programmes in Toyota Motors and also gave consultancy services. Based on Taiichi Ohno's book on Toyota Production System, Shingo gave further details of the system in the a book titiled "Study of Toyota Production System from Industrial Engineering Point of View."

You can read the summary of the books in these two parts.

http://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2014/02/industrial-engineering-foundation-of.html

http://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2014/02/industrial-engineering-foundation-of.html








Updated 27.5.2025,  9 Sep, 5 Sep 2015, 30 Nov 2013