Tuesday, April 11, 2023

The Evolution of Lean Construction Concept and Practice



The introduction of lean to the construction industry started in 1992 by Lauri Koskela  who presented Transformation-Flow-Value (TFV) theory, which has three phases of evolution. In the first phases, transformation was emphasized.  “Transformation”,  is transforming the inputs into outputs. The focus was on  decomposing the work into tasks, then minimizing the cost of these undertakings in order to realize the efficiency of the added-value activities. “Flow” of materials and information  includes, in addition to transformation, inspection, moving, and waiting. The main aim of flow design and improvement is minimizing the wastes of non-added value activities.

In the third phase, “Value” as generated from the customer point of view was highlighted. Product designers have to understand the needs of the customer and fulfillment of these needs has to be attempted by them. In addition to Koskela’swork, Ballard  introduced the Last Planner System (LPS), which is lean tool that was specifically developed in the construction field and aims to create a social process based on discussion between planning and site staff to have a reliable workflow. LPS is the most well-known lean construction tool for planning and control. 

Since the introduction of lean thinking in construction, several definitions were presented for the LC. 

Albalkhy and Sweis defined LC as “a philosophy that aims to improve the collaboration between all project stakeholders to maximize value for all of them in general and for the customer in particular. In addition to eliminating all kind of wastes, achieving continuous improvement, improving flow of materials, reducing cost and enhancing safety and quality”. 



List of the barriers that face the adoption of lean construction (2021)


Classification Barrier

Barriers Related to the Internal Environment

Poor understanding of the customer needs and lack of customer focus (IE1)

Management resistance to change (IE2)

Lack of support and commitment from top management (IE3)

Lack of involvement and transparency among stakeholders (IE4)

Lack of adequate lean awareness and understanding (IE5)

The results are not fast and often only partially visible, and may not conform with high

expectations from management (IE6)

Lean may lead to additional cost/Implementation cost (IE7)

Inaccurate and incomplete designs, and lack of applying the concept of design

constructability (IE8)

The reluctance of project participants to share risks (IE9)

Lack of a long-term philosophy and planning (IE10)

Lack of planning for quality (IE11)

Poor leadership and insufficient management skills (IE12)

Lack of incentives and motivation and poor professional wages (IE13)

Inadequate administration of the necessary information to generate a learning cycle and take

corrective actions (IE14)

Hierarchies in organizational structures/Unsuitable organizational structure (IE15)

Centralization of the decision and avoid making decisions and taking responsibility from

those who are not in the top management (IE16)

Lack of identification and control of waste (IE17)



Barriers Related to Input Factors (Labor)


Employees resistance to change and fear of unfamiliar practices (L1)

Unskilled labor and the low level of education of the site foreman (L2)

Insufficient training for workers (L3)

Labor consider lean too complex (L4)

High turnover of workforce (L5)


Barriers Related to Input Factors (Materials)


Inadequate delivery performance and the delays in materials delivery (M1)

Lack of long-term relationship with suppliers (M2)

Limited use of off-site construction techniques and the lack of prefabrication (M3)


Exogenous Barriers


Fragmented nature of the construction industry/so many parties joined the project,

especially subcontractors and suppliers (EX1)

Limited use of design-and-build procurement (EX2)

Stringent requirements and approvals during contracting (EX3)

Lack of support from the government (EX4)


Source: Albalkhy, W.; Sweis, R. Barriers to adopting lean construction in the construction industry: A literature review. Int. J. Lean Six Sigma 2020, 12, 136–210.

Barriers to Adopting Lean Construction in the Construction Industry—The Case of Jordan,Wassim Al Balkhy , , Rateb Sweis  and Zoubeir Lafhaj 

Al Balkhy, W.; Sweis, R.; Lafhaj, Z. Barriers to Adopting Lean Construction in the Construction Industry—The Case of Jordan., Buildings 2021, 11, 222., https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11060222


 2022


Lean Management

Last Planner

Digital Kanban

Create stability and on-time performance in every project

Share, plan and control projects in real time with digital lean construction management.

Fewer errors,  and supplements. Accelerate your project by up to 20%.

https://lcmdigital.com/en/


Takt Time Planning for Lean Construction

Create plans in minutes


Our Mission

Takt planning is highly effective and spreading through our industry like wildfire; however, most construction companies still use spreadsheets to create and manage their plans. We made it our mission to develop an easier way for everyone on a project to get involved in takt planning. That is why we built inTakt, an intuitive, purpose-built tool that creates detailed plans in minutes, not hours.


The 227-apartment SANCTUARY project coming up in Tollygunge will be the first in Eastern India to use the AI-enabled Lean PlanDo (LPD) project management software from Singapore.

Belani NPR Projects aims to save more than Rs 20 crores in construction costs by using Singapore’s Lean PlanDo.

May 15, 2022

IGLC Conference Papers - Free Access - Download










Ud. 11.4.2023
Pub 21.5.2022














No comments:

Post a Comment