Management is knowing exactly what you want men to do, and then seeing that they do it in the best and cheapest way. - F.W. Taylor in Shop Management.
The questions arise:
How to decide "what you want men to do?"
How to determine the best and cheapest way?
Original Writing of Taylor
These new duties are grouped under four heads:
First. They develop a science for each element of a man's work, which replaces the old rule-of.-thumb method.
Second. They scientifically select and then train, teach, and develop the workman, whereas in the past he chose his own work and trained himself as best he could.
Third. They heartily cooperate with the men so as to insure all of the work being done in accordance with the principles of the science which has been developed.
Fourth. There is an almost equal division of the work and the responsibility between the management and the workmen. The management take over all work for which they are better fitted than the workmen, while in the past almost all of the work and the greater part of the responsibility were thrown upon the men.
It is this combination of the initiative of the workmen, coupled with the new types of work done by the management, that makes scientific management so much more efficient than the old plan.
Three of these elements exist in many cases, under the management of "initiative and incentive," in a small and rudimentary way, but they are, under this management, of minor importance, whereas under scientific management they form the very essence of the whole system.
To summarize: Under the management of "initiative and incentive" practically the whole problem is "up to the workman," while under scientific management fully one-half of the problem is "up to the management."
[*Footnote: For example, the records containing the data used under scientific management in an ordinary machine-shop fill thousands of pages.]
F.W. Taylor, Scientific Management
All Chapters
F.W. Taylor Scientific Management - With Appropriate Sections
Next Chapter
Illustrations of Success of Scientific Management - - Pig Iron Handling
Updated 21.10.2024, 8.12.2023, 4.9.2022, 11.3.2022, 18.10.2021, 2 July 2017, 4 July 2016
The Principles of Scientific Management
Under scientific management the "initiative" of the workmen (that is, their hard work, their good-will, and their ingenuity) is obtained with absolute uniformity and to a greater extent than is possible under the old system; and in addition to this improvement on the part of the men, the managers assume new burdens, new duties, and responsibilities never dreamed of in the past. The managers assume, for instance, the burden of gathering together all of the traditional knowledge which in the past has been possessed by the workmen and then of classifying, tabulating, and reducing this knowledge to rules, laws, and formulae which are immensely helpful to the workmen in doing their daily work. In addition to developing a science in this way, the management take on three other types of duties which involve new and heavy burdens for themselves.
These new duties are grouped under four heads:
First. They develop a science for each element of a man's work, which replaces the old rule-of.-thumb method.
Second. They scientifically select and then train, teach, and develop the workman, whereas in the past he chose his own work and trained himself as best he could.
Third. They heartily cooperate with the men so as to insure all of the work being done in accordance with the principles of the science which has been developed.
Fourth. There is an almost equal division of the work and the responsibility between the management and the workmen. The management take over all work for which they are better fitted than the workmen, while in the past almost all of the work and the greater part of the responsibility were thrown upon the men.
It is this combination of the initiative of the workmen, coupled with the new types of work done by the management, that makes scientific management so much more efficient than the old plan.
Three of these elements exist in many cases, under the management of "initiative and incentive," in a small and rudimentary way, but they are, under this management, of minor importance, whereas under scientific management they form the very essence of the whole system.
The fourth of these elements, "an almost equal division of the responsibility between the management and the workmen," requires further explanation. The philosophy of the management of initiative and incentive makes it necessary for each workman to bear almost the entire responsibility for the general plan as well as for each detail of his work, and in many cases for his implements as well. In addition to this he must do all of the actual physical labor. The development of a science, on the other hand, involves the establishment of many rules, laws, and formulae which replace the judgment of the individual workman and which can be effectively used only after having been systematically recorded, indexed, etc. The practical use of scientific data also calls for a room in which to keep the books, records, etc., and a desk for the planner to work at.
Thus all of the planning which under the old system was done by the workman, as a result of his personal experience, must of necessity under the new system be done by the management in accordance with the laws of the science; because even if the workman was well suited to the development and use of scientific data, it would be physically impossible for him to work at his machine and at a desk at the same time. It is also clear that in most cases one type of man is needed to plan ahead and an entirely different type to execute the work.
The man in the planning room, whose specialty under scientific management is planning ahead, invariably finds that the work can be done better and more economically by a subdivision of the labor; each act of each mechanic, for example, should be preceded by various preparatory acts done by other men. And all of this involves, as we have said, "an almost equal division of the responsibility and the work between the management and the workman."
To summarize: Under the management of "initiative and incentive" practically the whole problem is "up to the workman," while under scientific management fully one-half of the problem is "up to the management."
Perhaps the most prominent single element in modern scientific management is the task idea. The work of every workman is fully planned out by the management at least one day in advance, and each man receives in most cases complete written instructions, describing in detail the task which he is to accomplish, as well as the means to be used in doing the work. And the work planned in advance in this way constitutes a task which is to be solved, as explained above, not by the workman alone, but in almost all cases by the joint effort of the workman and the management. This task specifies not only what is to be done but how it is to be done and the exact time allowed for doing it. And whenever the workman succeeds in doing his task right, and within the time limit specified, he receives an addition of from 30 per cent to 100 per cent to his ordinary wages. These tasks are carefully planned, so that both good and careful work are called for in their performance, but it should be distinctly understood that in no case is the workman called upon to work at a pace which would be injurious to his health. The task is always so regulated that the man who is well suited to his job will thrive while working at this rate during a long term of years and grow happier and more prosperous, instead of being overworked. Scientific management consists very largely in preparing for and carrying out these tasks.
The writer is fully aware that to perhaps most of the readers of this paper the four elements which differentiate the new management from the old will at first appear to be merely high-sounding phrases; and he would again repeat that he has no idea of convincing the reader of their value merely through announcing their existence. His hope of carrying conviction rests upon demonstrating the tremendous force and effect of these four elements through a series of practical illustrations. It will be shown, first, that they can be applied absolutely to all classes of work, from the most elementary to the most intricate; and second, that when they are applied, the results must of necessity be overwhelmingly greater than those which it is possible to attain under the management of initiative and incentive.
[*Footnote: For example, the records containing the data used under scientific management in an ordinary machine-shop fill thousands of pages.]
F.W. Taylor, Scientific Management
All Chapters
F.W. Taylor Scientific Management - With Appropriate Sections
Next Chapter
Illustrations of Success of Scientific Management - - Pig Iron Handling
An article on The Third Principle of Scientific Management by F.W. Taylor.
Theory of Cooperation - Introduction.
Industrial Engineering
Industrial engineering discipline was started to implement scientific shop management advocated by Taylor in engineering organizations. It has to be highlighted that much before scientific management, Taylor published a paper on productivity improvement and advocated the starting of a section termed "elementary rate fixing department." This department is given the responsibility of productivity improvement of machines and men and specifying the output possible per hour or day. This department only became industrial engineering department in later years. Taylor worked in the area of machine shop and then as chief engineering of the entire production establishment. Taylor's work is originally presented in ASME conferences. Hence application of IE in mechanical engineering took the lead. But in later years, other branches of engineering also got involved into industrial engineering.
Prof. K.V.S.S. Narayana Rao, developed principles of industrial engineering from principles of scientific management in basic form in 2016 and in detailed form in 2017. The detailed list of principles was presented in the international conference of IISE on 23 May 2017 at Pittsburgh, USA.
Principles of Industrial Engineering
Developed from Principles of Scientific Management
1. Develop science for each element of a man - machine system's work related to efficiency and productivity.
2. Engineer methods, processes and operations to use the laws related to the work of machines, man, materials and other resources.
3. Select or assign workmen based on predefined aptitudes for various types of man - machine work.
4. Train workmen, supervisors, and engineers in the new methods and ensure that expected productivity is achieved in the process.
5. Incorporate suggestions of operators, supervisors and engineers in the methods redesign on a continuous basis.
5. Incorporate suggestions of operators, supervisors and engineers in the methods redesign on a continuous basis.
6. Plan and manage productivity at system level.
(The above subsection - principles of industrial engineering was added on 4 June 2016. Principles developed by Narayana Rao)
Presentation in the International Conference of IISE on 23 May 2017 at Pittsburgh, USA
_________________
_________________
Presentation in the International Conference of IISE on 23 May 2017 at Pittsburgh, USA
_________________
_________________
Related Article
Engineering and Production Process Standards - Standardization - Standard Work - Standard Operations - Instructions.
Updated 21.10.2024, 8.12.2023, 4.9.2022, 11.3.2022, 18.10.2021, 2 July 2017, 4 July 2016
Develop science for each element of a man - machine system's work -
ReplyDeleteTHE PRINCIPLES OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT
http://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-principles-of-scientific-management.html
Modified Principles of Scientific Management and Industrial Engineering
ReplyDeleteDevelop science for each element of a man - machine system's work -
THE PRINCIPLES OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT
http://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-principles-of-scientific-management.html